Casey Anthony attorney: Judge Perry has 'clear bias'

[TotallyObsessed]

Wow, I think that is the shortest response I've ever seen!!! Awesome!!!! I really think he's so tired of them that all he can muster is a denied these days. LOL.

I bet Baez is blubbering, "But...but...but...he didn't say WHY!" lol

WAIT FOR IT...................5......4........3......2.......1.............

UPDATE COURT DOCKET:

Defendant's Motion for Clarification of Order dated March 25, 2011

Comes now the Defendant and her (unusual) defense team...and files this motion for clarification of the word DENIED.

:floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh:

 

[LCoastMom]

:rocker:

No other motions for rehearing shall be concidered! IOW ENOUGH ALREADY!!​

:rocker:

 

[katydid23]

With NO explanation - Just a big fat ole signature. :great:

:skip: :skip: :skip: :skip: :skip:

I LOVED that about it. He did not even bother to defend his position or to give any weight to Mason's whining. He just said NO. Done. End of Story.
That is making a statement in itself. ' I am the judge and I ruled already on the facts of the case, no need to rehear anything, bye bye.' LOL

 

[JSR]

And now, if it's allowed, I bet the defense will ask HHJP to recuse himself and if he says no then they can ask an appeal court to step in. And when they do then the whole case stops until the appeal court decides if they want to intervene or just let the case resume. But the case stops nonetheless which as many of us have seen and thought is what the defense really wants. They really just want to drag this case on as long as they can.

The defense can't appeal HHJP's decisions before trial but they can appeal if a Judge decides to not step down if a party decides to ask for the judge to recuse himself.

 

[Aedrys]

And now, if it's allowed, I bet the defense will ask HHJP to recuse himself and if he says no then they can ask an appeal court to step in. And when they do then the whole case stops until the appeal court decides if they want to intervene or just let the case resume. But the case stops nonetheless which as many of us have seen and thought is what the defense really wants. They really just want to drag this case on as long as they can.

The defense can't appeal HHJP's decisions before trial but they can appeal if a Judge decides to not step down if a party decides to ask for the judge to recuse himself.

But I thought because they already asked HHJS to step down, that it would be impossible to unseat HHJP. I am not feeling good about them dragging this out even more if they don't get their way with HHJP. UGH!

 

[zadari]

i think its a waste of time to even bother giving her a trial..bc she wont win..and lies have come out from all of the family.. but we live in a country where its the law .. i mean if she didnt do it why all the lies and omissions from their stories (thats what they are) they told the cops . i think they just best fess up the truth and all of it and think of the public who is financing this facade of a dream team( this whole thing is a farce ) the longer this drags on the more the tax payers are paying out .. i think that is why they are doing this (the dream team) dont they get paid by the hour ect? im pretty sure they arnt doing this probono no matter what they say .. they cant how could they afford it after all this time ? i think JBP is done with their crap and he intends to nail her right to the wall ..which is what she deserves

 

[JSR]

But I thought because they already asked HHJS to step down, that it would be impossible to unseat HHJP. I am not feeling good about them dragging this out even more if they don't get their way with HHJP. UGH!

That's why I said, if it's allowed. I don't know how many times a party may file for a judge to recuse themselves in a criminal matter, especially in FL. But if they are allowed to do it, then they will. I'm sure of it.

 

[logicalgirl]

You know, she does. I like her. She is very professional and appears to be concerned with seeing KC gets a fair trial but also is not that emotionally involved so she is able to make clear decisions. JB is just dangerously emotionally involved with his client. He is unable to think clearly and he is taking everything that is said too personally. While I understand you do get to know your client on a personal level his is way over and is causing him to over react personally when he should be concerned with legal issues and address them not "you're attacking my girl" attitude. It's just what I see. jmo

Lambchop........I wonder......My belief is that Jose is invested emotionally in his own success in the manner he wants that success to be made. He is trying too hard to control his own successful outcome. Cause to him success does not mean an excellent defense even if your client is found guilty - it means not guilty and to win at any and all costs. No exceptions.

I'm not certain he's emotionally invested in ICA - I think she's simply the vehicle or product he can use to reach the success he believes he so richly deserves. Just IMO of course.

 

[momtective]

WAIT FOR IT...................5......4........3......2.......1.............

UPDATE COURT DOCKET:

Defendant's Motion for Clarification of Order dated March 25, 2011

Comes now the Defendant and her (unusual) defense team...and files this motion for clarification of the word DENIED.

:floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh:

:floorlaugh:You know this is a very real possibility, don't you?:floorlaugh:

:woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo:
What an absolutely great week this has been toward justice for Caylee!
:woohoo: :woohoo: :woohoo:

 

[strawberry]

That's why I said, if it's allowed. I don't know how many times a party may file for a judge to recuse themselves in a criminal matter, especially in FL. But if they are allowed to do it, then they will. I'm sure of it.

Quit givin them idears! Between you and AZ's hey-i-hope-they-dont-go-for-a-state-of-mind-defense......

:floorlaugh::floorlaugh:

 

[TiaM]

With NO explanation - Just a big fat ole signature. :great:

:skip: :skip: :skip: :skip: :skip:

Ha Ha Ha!! Basically says: "Denied....NEXT!!!!! (and don't even THINK about asking again)"

:floorlaugh::great::floorlaugh::great:

 

[strach304]

That's why I said, if it's allowed. I don't know how many times a party may file for a judge to recuse themselves in a criminal matter, especially in FL. But if they are allowed to do it, then they will. I'm sure of it.

The recusel of JS was imo CM's idea. Let me tell you a story. :crazy: Many years ago there was this guy always getting into trouble for one thing after another but never did jail time. Long story short his lawyers tactic was to get postponements on his cases until they appointed a judge to his case that the lawyer was friends with or golfed together at the same country club he said. It always seemed to work. It was usually fines and/or probabtion. Take the very same judge, charges, etc. ended up with a much different outcome.

 

[denjet]

:rocker:

No other motions for rehearing shall be considered! IOW ENOUGH ALREADY!!​

:rocker:

bbm ... I read it so fast I thought it was saying he wouldn't hear it again ... but it now sounds to me like he's saying he won't hear anymore motions for rehearing !! :great:

 

[cyberborg]

Ha Ha Ha!! Basically says: "Denied....NEXT!!!!! (and don't even THINK about asking again)"

:floorlaugh::great::floorlaugh::great:

[Seinfeld] No soup for you .... NEXT !!!

 

[MissJames]

Lambchop........I wonder......My belief is that Jose is invested emotionally in his own success in the manner he wants that success to be made. He is trying too hard to control his own successful outcome. Cause to him success does not mean an excellent defense even if your client is found guilty - it means not guilty and to win at any and all costs. No exceptions.

I'm not certain he's emotionally invested in ICA - I think she's simply the vehicle or product he can use to reach the success he believes he so richly deserves. Just IMO of course.

I agree. ICA became infamous ,and that's the only draw for JB,IMO. It could be anybody else,as long as they brought the publicity with them.

 

[ClockWatcher]

With NO explanation - Just a big fat ole signature. :great:

:skip: :skip: :skip: :skip: :skip:

Ha ha ha....if you slide your cursor over the order, text will appear that says "GO TAKE A FLYING LEAP (unusual person)"

no not really, I was reading between the nonexistent lines!

 

[bananarama]

Can't wait to read it!!!

Quoting myself.....well that response was short and sweet. No explanation required!

 

[magnolia]

This is what I'm concerned about.

WFTV legal analyst Bill Sheaffer believes that the only reason Casey's lawyer would make these kind of accusations at this time is that they are trying to bounce another judge or at least delay the trial while they try.

http://www.wftv.com/news/27325233/detail.html

 

[cloud9]

OMG! I'm crying tears of relief and joy.

THANK YOU JUDGE PERRY!

:tears::tears::tears:

 

[denjet]

Lambchop........I wonder......My belief is that Jose is invested emotionally in his own success in the manner he wants that success to be made. He is trying too hard to control his own successful outcome. Cause to him success does not mean an excellent defense even if your client is found guilty - it means not guilty and to win at any and all costs. No exceptions.

I'm not certain he's emotionally invested in ICA - I think she's simply the vehicle or product he can use to reach the success he believes he so richly deserves. Just IMO of course.

ITA, LG ..
bbm
This case IS Jose's future and dreams of grandeur are all he cares about ... after this trial, when KC is convicted, does anyone really think he will be involved in anyway of helping with her appeal ? Will he visit her and help her anyway he can ... I realize he's not an appellate lawyer, but he wasn't a DP qualified lawyer either ...
He doesn't care one single bit about KC, just that people think he cares about her ...
IMO Jose and KC are very, very much alike ... and both of them are pathelogical liars, have no souls and, oh ya, are at the same junior high maturity level ...