Casey defense team wants tough questions asked of prosecutors??

Status
Not open for further replies.
Try the medical field. I once got a request for an MRI to "rule out an axillary mass in the vagina."

Given that "axillary" refers to the armpit........

Turned out the order should have said, "adnexal."

And, the typos get even funnier than that!

Silly you. Of course they were trying to figure out how that armpit got in that vagina. Most likely someone reached up there trying to get their foot out of their..
 
Verité;3807795 said:
If we're to follow the logical teachings of Prof AL (from her writings as cited herein), she doesn't recommend the SODDI defense in this type DP case, but goes for the
jury's emotional jugular with heaps of mitigation. For that to be successful, I fear she's going to have to prepare this defendant with a crash course in method acting. :cry:

That's for sure!

Actually, she'll prolly have to do the whole family. One rarely sees so much inappropriate affect in one place.
 
Silly you. Of course they were trying to figure out how that armpit got in that vagina. Most likely someone reached up there trying to get their foot out of their..

Then, there was the 3mm dick protrusion, between two vertebrae.. :waitasec:
 
I think that may just be the problem in this case - and perhaps behind the reason for all the desperate attempts the Anthonys have given to visit KC unrecorded. (I mean, what's left to corroborate and who would believe it from such impeached credibility anyway?)

They know JB will do nothing more than get her the green mile walk.

AL has brains, but since she does not look like a DJ at Fusian, there is no convincing KC that her white knight is really an Amazon...

Good one! White knight.. amazon! LIKE it!:woohoo::woohoo::woohoo:
 
You are right about the malapropism that runs rampant. Using "employ" instead of "implore" - particularly when the phrase itself is archaic and stiff - is not just limited to the Anthonys though. I've taught communication for people who have to interface with the legal field and their language tends to be rather baroque - trying to imitate legalese I suppose.

But it infects the media too; I think we generally read much less than we used to and we we use phrases we are doing so from hearing memory, not from visual memory. I've seen more reporters butcher the language - even making up words. One of my favorites is "glamorfy", as in "that lawyer seeks to glamorfy his reputation by appearing on camera whenever possible".

yeah, but even WE are falling into it. Like, "mistruths."

Of course, we use it in jest. Whereas JB IS a jest.
 
Then, there was the 3mm dick protrusion, between two vertebrae.. :waitasec:

Yep, a 3mm would confuse me . What does one do with 3mm?? Talk about needing tweezers. :crazy:

Which points to why I don't do medical transcriptions. I would be the one sending you such things. LOL!
 
I really feel that if the defense tries to use Jesse as a scapegoat, it's going to backfire on them. These jurors will get a good look at the witnesses in this trial, they will see Casey, her parent's, and all of the dysfunction they generate. They will learn of Casey's many lies to Jesse and others. They will see Jesse and how he wanted to be w/ Casey, even after he found out Caylee was not his. They will realize exactly what the defense is trying to pull and they will not like it, IMO.

They can't do SODDI.

KC would STILL be challenged on the where and when sh lot track of Caylee.
 
Try the medical field. I once got a request for an MRI to "rule out an axillary mass in the vagina."

Given that "axillary" refers to the armpit........

Turned out the order should have said, "adnexal."

And, the typos get even funnier than that!

That would have been a stretch.....*giggling again*:laughitup:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
129
Guests online
397
Total visitors
526

Forum statistics

Threads
627,579
Messages
18,548,336
Members
241,349
Latest member
Chiefs#1fan
Back
Top