Casey To Serve One Year Probation

[natsound]

Must be just me but this is glaring at me:

http://www.5dca.org/Clerk/Anthony/Anthony_Pet_Prohibition_081711.pdf



JMO, this makes it sound as if HHJS changed his mind and allowed the probation while in jail!!! I'm still reading tho...

What I'm reading is that the written pronouncement differed from the oral pronouncement.

 

[Tiki]

Setting aside the issue that the original order was entered by a previously
disqualified judge who participated in publicly criticizing the jury and their verdict
subsequent to his disqualification based on prejudice, the trial court engages in
three pages of moralizing about the responsibility of the defense counsel in candor
to the tribunal, as if somehow this entire “mess” was the responsibility of the
defense, rather than a vindictive act by a glaringly biased judge. (App. F). For the
record, this was not a case in which the defense was in possession of information
that neither the court, nor the State of Florida lacked. Instead, defense counsel only
learned of the probation informally, whereas the State of Florida received formal
notice of the commencement of probation. (App. F). Further, the former
disqualified judge actually signed the original order which established probation
while the Defendant was awaiting trial on a different set of charges. That the court
feels it necessary to chastise the defense (and the defense alone—by name) for not
bringing this matter to the court’s attention is, at best, misplaced.
___________
Oh, good grief . . .
CM got his shorts in a wad from the DT being slapped by HHBP

.

 

[strawberry]

What I'm reading is that the written pronouncement differed from the oral pronouncement.

I think you're right...I can't even read it it makes me so mad. Do they admit they knew about it but did not feel it was their "place" to say anything?

 

[strawberry]

Setting aside the issue that the original order was entered by a previously
disqualified judge who participated in publicly criticizing the jury and their verdict
subsequent to his disqualification based on prejudice, the trial court engages in
three pages of moralizing about the responsibility of the defense counsel in candor
to the tribunal, as if somehow this entire “mess” was the responsibility of the
defense, rather than a vindictive act by a glaringly biased judge. (App. F). For the
record, this was not a case in which the defense was in possession of information
that neither the court, nor the State of Florida lacked. Instead, defense counsel only
learned of the probation informally, whereas the State of Florida received formal
notice of the commencement of probation. (App. F). Further, the former
disqualified judge actually signed the original order which established probation
while the Defendant was awaiting trial on a different set of charges. That the court
feels it necessary to chastise the defense (and the defense alone—by name) for not
bringing this matter to the court’s attention is, at best, misplaced.
___________
Oh, good grief . . .
CM got his shorts in a wad from the DT being slapped by HHBP

.

:floorlaugh::floorlaugh: Wadded shorts and tight boots! Glad to see it got to them!!

 

[What'sThatClue]

Oh boy, I can't wait for them to appear before HHJP again...lol

That the court
feels it necessary to chastise the defense (and the defense alone—by name) for not
bringing this matter to the court’s attention is, at best, misplaced.

 

[strawberry]

Setting aside the issue that the original order was entered by a previously
disqualified judge who participated in publicly criticizing the jury and their verdict
subsequent to his disqualification based on prejudice, the trial court engages in
three pages of moralizing about the responsibility of the defense counsel in candor
to the tribunal, as if somehow this entire “mess” was the responsibility of the
defense, rather than a vindictive act by a glaringly biased judge. (App. F). For the
record, this was not a case in which the defense was in possession of information
that neither the court, nor the State of Florida lacked. Instead, defense counsel only
learned of the probation informally, whereas the State of Florida received formal
notice of the commencement of probation. (App. F). Further, the former
disqualified judge actually signed the original order which established probation
while the Defendant was awaiting trial on a different set of charges. That the court
feels it necessary to chastise the defense (and the defense alone—by name) for not
bringing this matter to the court’s attention is, at best, misplaced.
___________
Oh, good grief . . .
CM got his shorts in a wad from the DT being slapped by HHBP

.

Why does he say Appendix F? Shouldn't it probably be Appendix A?

 

[natsound]

I think you're right...I can't even read it it makes me so mad. Do they admit they knew about it but did not feel it was their "place" to say anything?

The defense, you mean? Yep. Unfortunately, the defense is also pointing out that the state knew about it too, and did nothing (an oversight). I hope it all doesn't backfire.

:slapfight: They're playing out their vendettas in these legal proceedings. It makes for very entertaining reading. opcorn:

 

[krimekat]

isn't this over yet? It is a matter of Court Order, but I guess this is yet another DT attempt to make FLAs Judicial system a joke.

 

[strawberry]

The defense, you mean? Yep. Unfortunately, the defense is also pointing out that the state knew about it too, and did nothing (an oversight). I hope it all doesn't backfire.

:slapfight: They're playing out their vendettas in these legal proceedings. It makes for very entertaining reading. opcorn:

I'd love to see reference they point to but the say See appendix F which is their motion to vacate...I think they meant appendix A which is Probation records. I still can't read the whole thing yet but I would like to see the appendices.

 

[Tiki]

will there be a hearing, or will the App court just deny the motion (I hope)

I don't think I can stand to hear LF yakin' again - she's a real fast talker, whiney and just doesn't stop repeating herself.

.

 

[Nette]

You beat me to it Karma! Even though I knew this was coming it still makes me mad. They think she is soooooooooooo special. IMO

I know what you mean, I'm fuming, just hope this appeal is denied. This girl as never been held accountable for anything in her life.


---
- Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[strawberry]

will there be a hearing, or will the App court just deny the motion (I hope)

I don't think I can stand to hear LF yakin' again - she's a real fast talker, whiney and just doesn't stop repeating herself.

.

I think appeals courts usually just review it without a hearing.

 

[strawberry]

isn't this over yet? It is a matter of Court Order, but I guess this is yet another DT attempt to make a Judicial system a joke.

Funny you ask that. JB keeps saying "this is over" but they appeal everything so it isn't.

 

[natsound]

I'd love to see reference they point to but the say See appendix F which is their motion to vacate...I think they meant appendix A which is Probation records. I still can't read the whole thing yet but I would like to see the appendices.

Can you pull up the order? I opened the link provided by another poster, and the appendices are not attached. Bummer... I want to see them too.

 

[krimekat]

Funny you ask that. JB keeps saying "this is over" but they appeal everything so it isn't.

I respect their want to Appeal everything, but SHE is not paying for any of this . . . YOU ARE, you fine citizens of Florida -- this would never happen in Illinois :maddening:

but then again, we have our own problems . . .

 

[strawberry]

I respect their want to Appeal everything, but SHE is not paying for any of this . . . YOU ARE, you fine citizens of Florida -- this would never happen in Illinois :maddening:

but then again, we have our own problems . . .

Me? I'm from Pennsylvania. :crazy:

 

[strawberry]

Can you pull up the order? I opened the link provided by another poster, and the appendices are not attached. Bummer... I want to see them too.

They're not attached in the link I have either. They're just listed. It's probably the same link:

http://www.5dca.org/Clerk/Anthony/Anthony_Pet_Prohibition_081711.pdf

 

[Sparky]

And of course it's an EMERGENCY motion...good grief look at this thing.

http://www.5dca.org/Clerk/Anthony/Anthony_Pet_Prohibition_081711.pdf

I think this is what you and I saw today on the 5th District website.

 

[deanna82437]

Setting aside the issue that the original order was entered by a previously
disqualified judge who participated in publicly criticizing the jury and their verdict
subsequent to his disqualification based on prejudice, the trial court engages in
three pages of moralizing about the responsibility of the defense counsel in candor
to the tribunal, as if somehow this entire “mess” was the responsibility of the
defense, rather than a vindictive act by a glaringly biased judge. (App. F). For the
record, this was not a case in which the defense was in possession of information
that neither the court, nor the State of Florida lacked. Instead, defense counsel only
learned of the probation informally, whereas the State of Florida received formal
notice of the commencement of probation. (App. F). Further, the former
disqualified judge actually signed the original order which established probation
while the Defendant was awaiting trial on a different set of charges. That the court
feels it necessary to chastise the defense (and the defense alone—by name) for not
bringing this matter to the court’s attention is, at best, misplaced.
___________
Oh, good grief . . .
CM got his shorts in a wad from the DT being slapped by HHBP

.

Bold by me. If I remember correctly, TV stated JP winced when LF used the word disqualified when referring to JS, yet they've used it again. Is there a difference in the legal meanings? JMO:read:

disqualified past participle, past tense of dis·qual·i·fy (Verb)
1. Pronounce (someone) ineligible for an office or activity because of an offense or infringement: "he was disqualified from driving".
2. Eliminate (someone) from a competition because of an infringement of the rules.

recuse verb
1. to disqualify (oneself) as judge in a particular case; broadly
2. to remove (oneself) from participation to avoid a conflict of interest

 

[knt]

will there be a hearing, or will the App court just deny the motion (I hope)

I don't think I can stand to hear LF yakin' again - she's a real fast talker, whiney and just doesn't stop repeating herself.head

.

I knew LF wrote it after reading the first couple of pages. Talk about repetitive! I could hear her voice as I read it. It's like I had to read it really fast to keep up with her voice in my head! LOL