Caylee Anthony 3 year old General discussion #95

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #621
I said nothing about her being a kidnapper nor do I dispute she was never a nanny to anyone. The point was if you can tie that ticket to Casey, you have your link... that's all.

Hey, it's nice to see we were both trying to make the same point for once.
 
  • #622
I posted to the "Peter Benevides: Bogus Dummy Corp" early this am and now it's "moved" and it says I don't have access when I click on it! Where did it get moved to? What did I do wrong???

Wasn't that info interesting? I am trying to find out where it is, too.
 
  • #623
With this hurricane coming--Casey might not be going anywhere.
 
  • #624
Not true. When I got my license back I got it with 7 points (yuck, I know but I deserve it trust me) so when I bought my car I put it in hubbys name alone. Our auto insurance is also in hubbys name alone (he has no points, no accidents, etc) because with my name on the insurance it would be through the roof because of my points.

Many many many people do the same thing.

We do it in my house. I have a good driving record, DH is 4 points away from suspended. Needless to say vehicles and insurance are in my name.
 
  • #625
What about the classic quote from George when he stated something to the effect of:

"Casey doesn't drink . . . Her friends call her mom . . . "

Yet in the interview on Greta the other night -- Tony's friend contradicts that by saying Casey was playing drinking games. I'm assuming she was just drinking Orange Juice though?

The pics of Casey hanging over the toilet, passed out in the car, etc will attest to the fact that she doesn't drink.....:doh:
 
  • #626
  • #627
  • #628
Yeah. This is no surprise. It's about making money from this case. It's not as if this is the first time in the history of the world that people are trying to profit from a sensational story.


And see how they do it, while trying to appear innocent and virtuous :(....from that same link,

“He finds a way for ordinary people to profit from extraordinary circumstances,” one ABC source said.

Some brokers—the disreputable ones, in Mr. Garrison’s account—provide a means for news outlets to bid on big-get interviews without the ethically messy expedient of paying the subject. Instead, the winning network or tabloid will arrange to interview the subject for free, while paying a hefty “licensing fee” for home videos or personal photographs to accompany the story. (Crocodile Hunter Steve Irwin’s widow chose this month to go with ABC and Barbara Walters; NBC offered $500,000 in licensing fees, according to a source with knowledge of the deal, but CBS and ABC offered between $750,000 and $1 million each.)
 
  • #629
She'll probably end up getting out for time already served.

I hope not, she may not be a killer, but she sure does deserve some time for the blatant neglect.
 
  • #630
  • #631
Here is something I was thinking about this morning. What if Casey really did give the child to a friend for awhile to punish Cindy(God knows for what) That would explain her being able to party without a care in the world. That might also explain her not seeming to show emotions that would correspond with a woman whose child had been kidnapped or murdered. WHAT IF the family now knows this and are trying to get out of this gracefully. They are hiring a spokesperson to answer all the demanding questions they will have from a nation who has been worried sick about Caylee. Then lets say Baez has hired this Padilla who will "miraculously" find Caylee.
OF course since Garrison is now the family spokesperson he is first in line to ghostwrite the book.
OTOH..we have that detective at the bond hearing who seemed absolutely adamant that he had good forensics and we have Cindy saying "The car smells like there has been a D*** DEAD Body in it.
So either way, this case will have to show it's true colors soon. IMHO
 
  • #632
I have never forgotten that...seeing this little girls face makes me break down!! I have three little girls of my own...I couldn't imagine any of them ever being "missing" from my life...I just don't see Casey as a cold-blooded murderer...I cannot fathom her carrying her dead body from place to place...throwing dirt over her like she was some dead pet hamster...driving in the car knowing that her dead child is rotting in the trunk...forgive me for what I believe...actually I don't want forgiveness for my beliefs...I see nothing wrong with having hope until there is no more to be had...I have had first hand experience with my close family member missing for 9 days and then watched on T.V. when they pulled her dead body out of a gushing creekbed!! I was there when the news was broke to her father...my father!! I held him as he dropped the phone, dropped to his knees and sobbed uncontrollably...I know how all this feels...I would hate for anyone else to have to go through what I've been through...So yes, I have hope...and I won't give it up until they pry it from my fingers...
 
  • #633
You can put your point whereever you want. But in my opinion someone took the child, although it was probably with Casey's consent. At least at first. At this point no one knows for sure that the nannny doesn't exist under some name. Remember I could say that aliens took Caylee and I would still be entitled to that opinion.

You can have whatever opinion you want. But there are reasonable opinions and unreasonable opinions. If this supposed nanny was caring for Caylee for over a year, where are the pictures, the sightings, the references to the nanny overheard by family friends, the phone records, the e-mails, the text messages? How come no one ever saw the nanny? How come no one outside the family has come forward just to say that they heard of this nanny before this case went public? How did Casey communicate with the nanny that you believe exists in order to arrange for Caylee to be nannied all this past year?

And if Caylee was taken, why did Casey have to lie about her employment, about her outcry witnesses Hopkins and Juliette? If Caylee was taken, come up with a theory that would also provide a reasonable explanation for all these inconsistencies and lies.
 
  • #634
Not true. When I got my license back I got it with 7 points (yuck, I know but I deserve it trust me) so when I bought my car I put it in hubbys name alone. Our auto insurance is also in hubbys name alone (he has no points, no accidents, etc) because with my name on the insurance it would be through the roof because of my points.

Many many many people do the same thing.

If you are living in the home with hubby you must be listed as a licensed driver. If you are in an accident the insurance company can refuse to pay citing fraud. So in essence you are driving without insurance. IMO
 
  • #635
I hope not, she may not be a killer, but she sure does deserve some time for the blatant neglect.

Oh I agree 100% but they put people found with a joint in there car away for longer amounts of time than child neglecters.
 
  • #636
Tiffertots - I am with you 100%

Alot of posters on this site should get off the keyboards and grab a pitchfork and stones for Monday's release. I refuse to call her a babykiller until I have evidence of foul play. Until there is a body, DNA, or a confession I will not be the majority.
 
  • #637
Wasn't that info interesting? I am trying to find out where it is, too.

It was! I figure if the mods were pissed at what I posted, why didn't they delete my postings instead of "move" the whole thread???
 
  • #638
Not true. When I got my license back I got it with 7 points (yuck, I know but I deserve it trust me) so when I bought my car I put it in hubbys name alone. Our auto insurance is also in hubbys name alone (he has no points, no accidents, etc) because with my name on the insurance it would be through the roof because of my points.

Many many many people do the same thing.
How does that work? Do you have something on your policy that insures drivers other than your husband, or are you basically taking your chances that if you drive the car you won't get into an accident?
 
  • #639
I said nothing about her being a kidnapper nor do I dispute she was never a nanny to anyone. The point was if you can tie that ticket to Casey, you have your link... that's all.

I get it. OK. Casey's paying for some imaginary person's parking tickets. I never thought of that.
 
  • #640
If you are living in the home with hubby you must be listed as a licensed driver. If you are in an accident the insurance company can refuse to pay citing fraud. So in essence you are driving without insurance. IMO

Naw, the car is insured.

I get what you are saying though, it shouldn't be done the way I do it. I realize that... I'm a cheat and a liar. I'm working on those parts of myself :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
86
Guests online
2,547
Total visitors
2,633

Forum statistics

Threads
633,182
Messages
18,637,266
Members
243,435
Latest member
guiltyWho
Back
Top