Cindy's Inconsistencies

Status
Not open for further replies.
That statement caught my eye awhile ago. Here's what I think: Casey wanted her mother to spot the car. She left it there on purpose. She left her purse in it on purpose. She wanted it to look like SHE AND CAYLEE had been victims of a crime. I'm not sure how she planned to get away with it, but I believe she intended to disappear at some point. However, we know that she doesn't think that far ahead and she didn't have enough money to simply disappear unless someone helped her. She may have grown complacent, too, thinking that maybe she wouldn't have to disappear because she had evaded her mother for a month already. She made the comment (and I can't remember to whom) that she had a Plan B, or words to that effect. I'll have to go searching for the quote now!:doh:
 
I was reviewing some Larry King transcripts and she states this:

CINDY ANTHONY: Well let me tell you why I say that. It's because they told us there was one person in central Florida with that name. In fact there's nine in central Florida. I just got a phone call on my way here that there's four in Fort Lauderdale and my daughter said that this girl had a Fort Lauderdale number and has connections in Fort Lauderdale and New York, and New Jersey.
In every state, there's people by this name. They think she's smart enough to make up this person for the last two and a half years, but dumb enough to park a car where in plain sight that her mother would drive by twice a day and see and leave her purse in the front seat of the car and not drive it into some lake.
So, my daughter is not a murder. My granddaughter is missing. My granddaughter is missing.


The part I am concerned with is this:
"but dumb enough to park a car where in plain sight that her mother would drive by twice a day and see"


Alright help me with this......this is what is telling to me...
This is NOT the only time when Cindy A talks in the THIRD PERSON. She talks in first person....I statements...throughout the conversation UNTIL she gets to this part about the car and refers to herself as "her mother".

I have seen this countless other times as well. I would love start a thread and compile these. From what I understand, when speaking in the 3rd person, it is a way to distance yourself from the pain or from something you don't want to have anything to do with. I am the kind of person who listens to what they say but also HOW they say it. JMHO.
 
I wonder if that interview was during the time period when Cindy was ranting on the news about how the left behind purse was an indicator of the kidnapping but also the motor vehicle theft which Cindy was selling for a short while.

Back then, It could be that Cindy's point is that the nanny is not made up and that it was not Casey who parked the car at Amscot.

Cindy abondoned this crock theory of hers and we did not hear it from her again...that the car was stolen and parked by the unknown car thief/ OR the car thief nanny.
 
That statement caught my eye awhile ago. Here's what I think: Casey wanted her mother to spot the car. She left it there on purpose. She left her purse in it on purpose. She wanted it to look like SHE AND CAYLEE had been victims of a crime. I'm not sure how she planned to get away with it, but I believe she intended to disappear at some point. However, we know that she doesn't think that far ahead and she didn't have enough money to simply disappear unless someone helped her. She may have grown complacent, too, thinking that maybe she wouldn't have to disappear because she had evaded her mother for a month already. She made the comment (and I can't remember to whom) that she had a Plan B, or words to that effect. I'll have to go searching for the quote now!:doh:

I think she said something to Tony on the call from jail about a back up plan and he says he does not want to her that..I believe it was in reference to stealing from Amy IIRC...
 
That statement caught my eye awhile ago. Here's what I think: Casey wanted her mother to spot the car. She left it there on purpose. She left her purse in it on purpose. She wanted it to look like SHE AND CAYLEE had been victims of a crime. I'm not sure how she planned to get away with it, but I believe she intended to disappear at some point. However, we know that she doesn't think that far ahead and she didn't have enough money to simply disappear unless someone helped her. She may have grown complacent, too, thinking that maybe she wouldn't have to disappear because she had evaded her mother for a month already. She made the comment (and I can't remember to whom) that she had a Plan B, or words to that effect. I'll have to go searching for the quote now!:doh:

Didn't I read somewhere that she was trying to get out to California? Sorry I can't remember, because there are just so many players and so many stories it's hard to keep all the lies straight. But I think that I remember that she was going out to California and she said something about needing to tell the guy something and not being sure how he would react. I wonder if she planned on claiming she was going there and then never arriving, or arriving and then disappearing fro there. Mighty far away....
 
Didn't I read somewhere that she was trying to get out to California? Sorry I can't remember, because there are just so many players and so many stories it's hard to keep all the lies straight. But I think that I remember that she was going out to California and she said something about needing to tell the guy something and not being sure how he would react. I wonder if she planned on claiming she was going there and then never arriving, or arriving and then disappearing fro there. Mighty far away....


Yeah I remember that too. I think she had an online "thing" going with a marine in Cal. There was mention that Casey had something to tell him."
 
Sorry, I searched for a Larry King comments thread, I forgot there was a Cindy thread out there!
 
Yeah I remember that too. I think she had an online "thing" going with a marine in Cal. There was mention that Casey had something to tell him."

Right! I remember thinking that either he was the father, or she was just saying that in order to try to get him curious enough to pay for her ticket out there.
 
I was reviewing some Larry King transcripts and she states this:

CINDY ANTHONY: Well let me tell you why I say that. It's because they told us there was one person in central Florida with that name. In fact there's nine in central Florida. I just got a phone call on my way here that there's four in Fort Lauderdale and my daughter said that this girl had a Fort Lauderdale number and has connections in Fort Lauderdale and New York, and New Jersey.
In every state, there's people by this name. They think she's smart enough to make up this person for the last two and a half years, but dumb enough to park a car where in plain sight that her mother would drive by twice a day and see and leave her purse in the front seat of the car and not drive it into some lake.
.


snipped for space

here is a map of home, ca work, and amscot, it looks like if she drove by it on the way/home from work, she would have had to take the long way! maybe ca didn't know exactly where the store on colonial was located when she said that, as her work is off colonial, just futher down?

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=d&sad...28.518478,-81.35994&spn=0.60212,0.878906&z=10
 
this may or may not belong here, but a question i was wondering about.
In the beginning, sorry, don't have the reference. It was said that the grandparents would pay for everything for Caylee, except Casey had to earn her own entertainment money.
So my question is: To whom did the grandparents make babysitting payments too.? And why wasn't anyone interested in enrolling an almost 3 year old in a preschool for the fall?


I think Cindy was stating that George & Cindy alone took care of Caylee--Casey never contributed money for doctors, food, clothes, etc. Casey was basically a teenager who never left home & who had a baby at 19--her parents took care of Caylee like they did Casey.


I have a 3 year old & she won't be going to preschool. Preschool is generally daycare for a child that age--PreK is for 4 year olds, which is when she'll start. It also has to do with the local public school district. Some have preschool for 3 year olds, some do not. Our school system does not. You can enroll them in a private program, but it tends to be expensive. I don't think that shows any type of neglect that Caylee wasn't enrolled, esp. seeing how much the grandparents took care of her.
 
snipped for space

here is a map of home, ca work, and amscot, it looks like if she drove by it on the way/home from work, she would have had to take the long way! maybe ca didn't know exactly where the store on colonial was located when she said that, as her work is off colonial, just futher down?

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=d&sad...28.518478,-81.35994&spn=0.60212,0.878906&z=10

very interesting point! even more so - why say it???

But she could be cheap and take 50 instead of the toll road. I would spend the money because 50 would take FOREVER but some people do it!
 
I found this from an interview with a FOX reporter and Cindy from back in July. It shows me that she and her daughter are cut from the same mold. Sort of like “well you aren’t paying any attention to me and my cockamamie story, I’ll show you......I’ll get rid of any evidence there might be and then you’ll be sorry.”

Does anybody else see that? Or is it me?

CYNTHIA ANTHONY: I don't know. I mean, they had receipts that could have traced my daughter's last actions for the last month. They didn't want them. They didn't even want to go through any of her personal things. It's too late now, guys. I've already put her stuff away. So you know, I let it sit out in her bedroom for the last week-and-a-half, and no one's wanted to comb through any of the stuff that we took from the apartment.
FRANCO: Talk to us about the receipts. What kind of receipts did the Orange County sheriff...
CYNTHIA ANTHONY: She has receipts from going to the grocery story, from going shopping, from doing whatever. They could have went back at the stores to see if Caylee was with her. They could have done a whole lot of things. They haven't -- you know, they didn't. So it's too late now to go back. I don't have those anymore.

MORE EVIDENCE SHE DESTROYED

Unbelievable. She waited a whole 10 days! Why didn't she go and check it out herself!? Right, she was too busy giving media interviews. Apparently, CA thought that the entire Orlando PD should put a break on all its other active cases, devote 100 % of its resources to checking out her daughter's whereabouts for the prior five weeks as opposed to following solid leads in finding Caylee (ie cell phone pings.) Then again, CA could have hounded her daughter to tell the truth so none of the above would be necessary. This woman is a piece of work!
 
[/B]
I think she said something to Tony on the call from jail about a back up plan and he says he does not want to her that..I believe it was in reference to stealing from Amy IIRC...

I have never heard the phone conversation between Tony and Casey from jail. I thought that they had never talked when she was in jail. I just looked through the forum section where the other jail house phone calls are linked - is the call between Tony and Casey linked on this website?
 
I have never heard the phone conversation between Tony and Casey from jail. I thought that they had never talked when she was in jail. I just looked through the forum section where the other jail house phone calls are linked - is the call between Tony and Casey linked on this website?


I think the original poster made a mistake. That call was Casey calling Tony from home on the morning when the detectives dropped her off after she led them on their first wild goose chase. Tony was confused because Casey had always told him she had 15K in the bank, and she was successfull at US. He asked Casey why the hell she would steal from Amy when she already had her own money. She said she needed a "back up plan" and he was like WTH do you need a back up plan for?
:bang:
 
I have never heard the phone conversation between Tony and Casey from jail. I thought that they had never talked when she was in jail. I just looked through the forum section where the other jail house phone calls are linked - is the call between Tony and Casey linked on this website?

He tells the dectective in the 400+ Discovery... go to his interview..
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZvEhnzlobA&feature=related

Listen to this interview!! Good grief this lady lies and lies and lies.

1. She says she spoke to KC every day. She says that KC gave her 'clues' throughout the entire month as to where Caylee was possibly at. She never had any doubt during that 30 days that Caylee was not with her mother. She never had any reason to disbelieve her.

Then why did she tell KC that she had given her a month on the 911 call? Why does she threaten her with taking her to court to get Caylee?

2. She doesn't become worried about KC or Caylee until they find the car. KC told her she was in Jacksonville. Her purse was left in the car which she found very strange. She had told her mom that she was working and visiting friends. Then she goes on to say that KC has always been a very responsible adult and an excellent mother.

Well doesn't that fly in the face of what we have now learned? NO WAY did she think KC was a responsible adult and an excellent mother. If so, why was she seeing a counselor who told her to kick KC out and get custody of Caylee? Does a responsible adult steal steal and steal some more? When CA gave this interview she already knew that KC had stolen money from the nursing home fund AND ran up credit card bills in her name.


3. CA says the car was left and KC had ample opportunity to pick the car up. She doesn't believe KC knew where the car was at and she's not convinced that she was the last person who drove the car. She says why would a woman leave your purse

OH MY FLIPPING GOD! Is this woman for real? We know FOR A FACT that KC was the last person to drive the car. TonE picked her up from Amscot on June 27 at between 11am-1pm for crying out loud and 3 days later the car was towed. She left her purse in hopes that the car would get stolen.

4. When the interviewer asks her to explain her 911 call about 'smells like a dead body in the damn car,' she says that she can't explain because there was no dead body in the car. It was a bag of pizza that sat for 19 days in the florida heat in the direct sun. She says there is no evidence that links Caylee to anything in the trunk of the car.

Come on. Even at this early date the cadaver dogs say differently.

5. She says to review the police tapes. There was no evidence in thier backyard. The reason that they brought out a second dog is because the first one made inconsistant hits. Hits on the playhouse and the sandbox. The reason she says it was an inconsistant hit is because according to her the dog never hit on the same place twice.

Is CA living in the twilight zone?

6. Asked about ZG and why the cops can't verify she exists, CA says that there are ZG's in New Jersey, New York and Miami that match what KC told the cops.

How many ZG's are the A-clan saying kidnapped Caylee? What? Is there just a wandering band of ZG's out there kidnapping children that the public needs to be aware of?

7. CA then states that the reason the public thinks KC is uncarring and unfeeling is because that is how the media portrayes her. She says there are no statements or videotapes made by KC that PROVES she is uncarring. It's the MEDIA that is not doing responsible reporting and only playing clips. That is why America is turning on the A-clan.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. I wonder what her story will be now since the audio of her interviews have been released?? No one needs to hear 'clips' as we can listen to the whole ugly interview ourselves, word for disgusting word.

8. The most troubling thing of all is when CA says "you guys (media) are going to responsible if Caylee is not found and she is not back to us by her 3rd birthday."

Ugh. Words can't even describe how foul her statement is. This whole family lives in a alternate universe where accountablity doesn't exist. The ONLY person responsible for Caylee never returning to her family is the person sitting in their home with a ankle monitor.

9. The interviewer states that KC needs to be more cooperative. CA says that KC HAS been cooperative. She says there are no expert witnesses comming to interview her daughter. She then says the american public has not turned against them, she gets phone calls everyday from people who think the media is full of crap and the media is not doing responsible reporting. She states once again that "you guys" are going to be responsible if Caylee isn't brought home to them.

Expert witnesses? Huh? What is she talking about? She just talks in circles and never makes any sense. Didn't she just get through saying that the reason america was turning against them was because of the media, and then she says that america isn't turning against them?

Words cannot express how disturbing and sick this whole family is.
 
Cindy cannot even get herself to say her daughter is a big liar. Instead she softens it by saying that she tells "half-truths".
 
I was reviewing some Larry King transcripts and she states this:

CINDY ANTHONY: Well let me tell you why I say that. It's because they told us there was one person in central Florida with that name. In fact there's nine in central Florida. I just got a phone call on my way here that there's four in Fort Lauderdale and my daughter said that this girl had a Fort Lauderdale number and has connections in Fort Lauderdale and New York, and New Jersey.
In every state, there's people by this name. They think she's smart enough to make up this person for the last two and a half years, but dumb enough to park a car where in plain sight that her mother would drive by twice a day and see and leave her purse in the front seat of the car and not drive it into some lake.
So, my daughter is not a murder. My granddaughter is missing. My granddaughter is missing.


The part I am concerned with is this:
"but dumb enough to park a car where in plain sight that her mother would drive by twice a day and see"

Is she telling us she SAW this car at Amscot twice a day?

WTH! There has to be more to this. Why make this comment???? and elude to her doing this in lieu of driving it into the lake? Did they WANT the car towed?

It sounds like she knew the car was there the whole time?
This is purely speculation based on her own statements I am not trying to implicate her in any way merely trying to figure out why her comment was made, it seems to me she knew this car was parked there the only other possibility is that she was eluding that she eventually would see it there twice a day?

Seems odd to elude that eventually she would have seen it while trying to prove her daughter to not be this “smart person” everyone is making her out to be because she would then be smarter than someone whom would leave a vehicle that smells of decomposition parked in a spot with the purse inside in a location that she (her mother) would see it twice a day rather than dump it into a lake which is what a “smart person” would do. Eluding that she had actually seen it twice a day perhaps? But why not do something?

Broken down this whole statement is to imply that everyone thinks Casey is smart enough to make up this person for 2 1/2 years (Casey actually claimed 4) but dumb enough to park a car with a decomposition smell in a spot that she herself would see it twice a day rather than drive it into a lake.

So she is proposing her daughter is innocent and not smart enough to pull the wool over everyone’s eyes with lies for the past two years because she was dumb and parked her car where she (Cindy) could see it twice a day?
So she must have seen this car parked there twice a day, if not why say twice a day?

Merely speculation on my part I do not wish to imply anything at all except that I find her comments very telling and I think if OCSO has not picked up on this I hope they do. This somehow seems important, if she did see this car there for how long? June 27 is a Friday June 30 is a Monday.

She always talks of red flags I think if she saw this car there prior to it being towed that should have been a major red flag, why wait for it to be towed? Why make this comment trying to prove Casey dumb enough to park a car, where in plain sight her mother would drive by twice a day, If she is implying the "future" possibility of seeing that car when in a short period of time on almost ANY car lot these days it would be towed anyway?

Am I stretching? Or could there be more to this? Protecting her perhaps? She seems to know more than she reveals in one sitting, a little seems to come out each time she talks.

I don't think you're stretching at all -- it is a very interesting point. If she simply slipped, admitting that she had actually seen the car, it would explain a lot of inconsistencies surrounding the car generally. On the other hand, if she is implying that she would have seen the car daily (I'm assuming on her regular routes to and from work, or...), it may be further evidence of Casey's intention to have the car discovered -- in this case by her Mother -- and thus provide her with the "kidnapping" alibi she may have staged the car to suggest.
 
Cindy cannot even get herself to say her daughter is a big liar. Instead she softens it by saying that she tells "half-truths".
Does that mean that half of what she says is true - I'll bet that half consists of telling her name. There's no such thing as half truths - it's eithr true or it's not. Cindy would not know it's half truths - she is just covering for the little liar moo
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
153
Guests online
650
Total visitors
803

Forum statistics

Threads
625,973
Messages
18,516,780
Members
240,910
Latest member
FinnTheClues
Back
Top