- Joined
- Feb 17, 2017
- Messages
- 6,911
- Reaction score
- 66,617
This 100%.agree, his irrational choices left a woman dead. There is no amount of sugar coating that can change that fact. JMO
This 100%.agree, his irrational choices left a woman dead. There is no amount of sugar coating that can change that fact. JMO
The post said: "Then, through no fault of his own, he is faced with a nightmare."I disagree with “through no fault of his own”
He shot through his front door knowing someone was standing on the other side of it. Whose fault was it? A person who owns a firearm needs to use it responsibly.
She had not gained access to his home.
Yes, it is a nightmare. But a nightmare for the children, husband, extended family, friends, and all who knew and loved her.
JMO
It was not his fault someone was attempting to enter his home. As stated, that was the nightmare.No fault of his own? Shooting through a door is something no decent human being would ever do. JMO
someone breaking in is a nightmare. they were not breaking in, they were just trying to enter. (a reasonable person knows the difference.) and they were obviously failing at it. and the police were on the way.It was not his fault someone was attempting to enter his home. As stated, that was the nightmare.
Did he call 911 before or after shooting her?
I'm very curious if Maria and her husband had obvious cleaning supplies in hand, like a vacuum, mops, one of those handy carrier things that fits all the sprays, etc.
If so, and they were seen on camera, how did the homeowner jump to the conclusion they were breaking in? They were going to break in and what? Clean their house?
and/or driving a car labeled "SO AND SO CLEANING SERVICE"I'm very curious if Maria and her husband had obvious cleaning supplies in hand, like a vacuum, mops, one of those handy carrier things that fits all the sprays, etc.
If so, and they were seen on camera, how did the homeowner jump to the conclusion they were breaking in? They were going to break in and what? Clean their house?
Before
The exact quote from the article is "called 911 at 6:49 a.m. Wednesday to report two Hispanic people trying to break in while he and his wife were in an upstairs bedroom." Nothing about seeing them from a window. That could be the case or it could be a doorbell cameraWas there a camera? I have only read that the shooter saw Maria and her husband on the porch from an upstairs window, though it seems he had a pretty decent view, good enough to determine the people on his porch were Hispanic.
I would wager that they were carrying at least some supplies, like you say, one of those little caddies with visible bottles and dusters etc. I wonder if the cleaning company provides uniforms?
Yes. The initial 911 call was to report a break-in. The husband's 911 call reporting a shooting happened laterAre we 100% sure? If the homeowner was on the phone with 911 before the shooting, I strongly believe the 911 operator would have told him to stay locked in the room, and this would mean he disregarded those instructions, which makes him even more guilty of a crime, in my opinion.
Were they attempting to break in? Or were they knocking on the door or something? Because there's a very high chance the poor person was unaware that they were at the wrong address or posing a "threat"It was not his fault someone was attempting to enter his home. As stated, that was the nightmare.
Exactly this. The chances he actually felt threatened are slimtwo hypotheticals here. if there was a doorbell camera, and if (like many of them) it had an intercom, that would be another way he could have communicated with them and asked what they wanted / told them to go away / warned them / threatened them / said he had a gun, etc.. it would be yet another option he apparently skipped.
lots of ifs here, admittedly
they were trying to open the door with keys they had that weren't working because they weren't at the right house. i think people generally agree that having random strangers try to unlock your door is more alarming than knocking, but the debate is centering on whether it amounts to a "home invasion" that he reasonably perceived to leave him no choice but to start shooting through a locked door.Were they attempting to break in? Or were they knocking on the door or something? Because there's a very high chance the poor person was unaware that they were at the wrong address or posing a "threat"
In complete agreement with you. Conversely, it seems like an uphill battle to argue that you saw two people on your porch, from your 2nd story bedroom window, and knew/assumed they were trying to break-in. I'm leaning towards a doorbell camera and that's how the homeowner saw the victim with a set of keys (still conflicting details about whether Maria actually tried the key in the door or not.)two hypotheticals here. if there was a doorbell camera, and if (like many of them) it had an intercom, that would be another way he could have communicated with them and asked what they wanted / told them to go away / warned them / threatened them / said he had a gun, etc.. it would be yet another option he apparently skipped.
lots of ifs here, admittedly
I'm sure this has been mentioned, but it gnaws at me...This is exactly why this discussion might be so important. Yes, you might be being sent to a new home in which no one has ever lived. However, after this case, aren't you now aware of the possibility you might have the wrong house? Can't you now see the value of knocking first?