The judge was clear in his explanation to the jury that DK couldn't be found. This does not bode well for the PT.Wrong. Nothing of the sort came from the discussion among judge, PT and DT. And, Judge corrected himself in front of the jury.
The judge was clear in his explanation to the jury that DK couldn't be found. This does not bode well for the PT.Wrong. Nothing of the sort came from the discussion among judge, PT and DT. And, Judge corrected himself in front of the jury.
I think you are imagining that in your head. No one said that the PT was hiding DK or even hinted as much.The judge was clear in his explanation to the jury that DK couldn't be found. This does not bode well for the PT.
Wrong again. The Defense and their weak expert claimed DK couldn't be found because so-called PI sat outside a couple of residences for a couple hours. Onus was NOT on PT to look for DK. DK was a DT witness.The judge was clear in his explanation to the jury that DK couldn't be found. This does not bode well for the PT.
Plus he just said Chase's cell phone and CJ's cell phone pinged in the same place on that night!Does it sound like the DT is "testifying"? They're treating the jurors like morons, IMO.
Exactly.Why is this not being emphasized? The DT brought him into the case. PT had cleared him. Why would they need to find him?Wrong again. The Defense and their weak expert claimed DK couldn't be found because so-called PI sat outside a couple of residences for a couple hours. Onus was NOT on PT to look for DK. DK was a DT witness.
I hope the PT points that out in their final closing.Exactly.Why is this not being emphasized? The DT brought him into the case. PT had cleared him. Why would they need to find him?
So SA called SB about starting the fountain even though CM got the initial check and final check for the SA job BEFORE IT WAS EVEN STARTED on checks he wrote to himself.
Tnx, DT, you just shored up that point.
The PT's objection implied this, there was no point or benefit in them doing so, the bell can't be unrung. IMO, it was a tactical error, they would have been better off not objecting in the first place.No one said that the PT was hiding DK or even hinted as much.
Great minds think alike, LOL!Maline made a big blunder stating they hadn’t started the SA job yet. Then why would Joey issue a check with “SA final” on the memo line?
Yep, and this drop to 15%? Joey didn't TRUST CM to buy materials, pay MSM, etc.Maline made a great point about them being two separate businesses so again, why would Joey give a NON employee access to his bank account or accounting software? Doesn't make sense.