- Joined
- Aug 7, 2012
- Messages
- 5,666
- Reaction score
- 39,253
It sounds good but I believe the supporters are family members.Ha.This is bothersome, who are his "supporters?"
It sounds good but I believe the supporters are family members.Ha.This is bothersome, who are his "supporters?"
And me.Add me to the list of side-eyes on the "supporters".
He will insist that it is not his money ,but that of his family and supporters.He claims he is indigent and that he can't pay for an attorney, but he has "access" to $300,000 for "nonrefundable" bail. Who ever gets to ask him THAT question? Who holds him accountable? I don't understand!
My assumption is that he, or his “friends”/family spent at least 300k of non refundable money to keep him out until trial. I don’t think he will violate-not because he follows the rules, I believe that he will have excuses and the state will not watch him like a hawk. I also imagine he thinks he will sue when he is found not guilty for some kind of unlawful prosecution or some other ridiculous thing, and get the bail money, and more, back.IMO BM’s been a shady character for a very lonnggg time, I suspect most of his life. To put it bluntly, a greedy, scheming liar, fraud, user, conman. The type that sees other people as objects, sizes them up for how useful they are to him, chews them up and spits them out so to speak once he’s done manipulating and using them to his advantage. Someone whom I don’t doubt burned many bridges in both Indiana and Colorado, and likely Arizona as well. It boggles my mind he’d have any friends left at all, let alone friends willing to go out on a limb and pay his non refundable bondsman’s fee to get him out of jail. And supporters? Who could those be?! Really hard for me to buy he has friends or supporters willing to pay to bond him out, but who knows in this crazy case.
IMO either the “friends and supporters” his Attorney DB referred to paying his bond are friends/supporters that have stuck around all these years & still being bamboozled and used by BM to his benefit, OR and imo more probable, they are the Morphew women (Mom, Daughters’, Sisters’) whom more than likely are the only friends and supporters he has left pooled their funds together to bond him out and perhaps his Attorney just used vague language describing them as his friends and supporters rather than family member(s).
At any rate, some people BM’s Attorney described as friends and supporters were able to gather enough funds together to pay the bondsman’s 10-15% non refundable fee which could be $300k (10%) on the lower end, up to $450k (15%) on the higher end. They do not get this money back.
All I can say is this guy hopefully stays alive and shows up for all judicial proceedings and trial and that rational, reasonable, logical, common sense jury members are seated as he needs to be held accountable for what he did to Suzanne and God willing will be via conviction at trial followed by being sent off to the big house aka prison for a very long time, LWOP sounds about right to me.
Tick Tock…
IMHOO
#JUSTICEFORSUZANNE
My assumption is that he, or his “friends”/family spent at least 300k of non refundable money to keep him out until trial. I don’t think he will violate-not because he follows the rules, I believe that he will have excuses and the state will not watch him like a hawk. I also imagine he thinks he will sue when he is found not guilty for some kind of unlawful prosecution or some other ridiculous thing, and get the bail money, and more, back.
Would not admissions, as are confessions, have to be corroborated?I agree, he's most likely to roll the dice and lose.
But one of his lawyers has a reputation for negotiating with prosecutors. If Morphew can articulate a case for Murder in the Second Degree, he can make himself eligible for a drastic reduction in sentence. But I suspect he'll have to admit he killed Suzanne, and also disclose in verifiable fact exactly what he did with Suzanne's remains and why, among other things he'll be reluctant to share.
Here’s the thing, imo I doubt the money $300k or more, if he still had that much to his name after paying his first high profile Attorney IE, was in any account in his name. He likely made sure of it just in case he was arrested again after Suzanne’s body was found which after said 2nd arrest, he wouldn’t have been able to declare and be considered indigent by the court if he had that much money in any account bearing his name.He claims he is indigent and that he can't pay for an attorney, but he has "access" to $300,000 for "nonrefundable" bail. Who ever gets to ask him THAT question? Who holds him accountable? I don't understand!