You can't sidestep the appointment process, and defendants facing the most serious criminal charge do not have their attorneys chosen at random. Both the Public Defender and the ADC Director make their appointment recommendations based on who, in their judgment and among the available attorneys, will best represent the individual defendant in the individual case. For BM, JFB was hands down that attorney, due not only to her preeminent qualifications but also to her intimate knowledge of the evidence produced in the initial investigation. If it had not been JFB, it would have been another highly skilled and experienced attorney like DB.Doesn't it remain true, however, they BM side-stepped the system by getting his attorneys of note? Had just enough money to retain them, now gets to keep them, on the State's payroll as PDs? A favor/advantage.
Particularly steaming, that there's a clear record of him moving money out of his name in order to appear indigent.
JMO
These people cannot ethically -- and do not -- hand murder cases over to Ham and Eggers. Nor would a judge approve such an appointment.
If BM's transfers of assets actually prove to be an effort to defraud the public, Colorado has both criminal (Perjury) and civil means of redress.
My best guess is that his asset transfers to trusted family members are bona fide, but that all the parties understood (not as a quid pro quo but as a matter of family loyalty) that the property would be used to help him when he was charged. His family is in serious psychological denial that he killed SM, even in the face of overwhelming (IMO) evidence.
MOO.
Last edited: