These type of grifter You-Tube investigator wannabe hacks like JRL? JLR? whatever the heck he’s called stunt/s for lack of a better word, make my blood boil.
So many of us that have been following this case for 5.5 years looking forward to watching this creep BM’s court hearings and trial but because of grifters selfishness and blatant disregard of court’s rules end up ruining everything for the rest of us/the masses who have been closely following this case who like to watch judicial proceedings. Some also like to take their own notes while watching/listening as so many things can be missed. Ughhh what an absolute brainless dolt/s who should know better. I think they do but don’t care. It’s not so much about justice for Suzanne for some of these unscrupulous YT’ers rather, imo using Suzanne’s case to get exposure for themselves/their channel for clicks and money. Horrible.
At any rate, I hadn’t heard much about BM’s current Attorney DB so decided to look him up. He’s highly rated, one of Colorado’s Top Defense Attorneys, well heeled and has won all kinds of awards. Sound familiar? After some research, personally DB appears to me to be similar to BM’s previous Atyorney IE, the male version of IE, accolades and all, the whole shebang. Just a bit younger and so likely not as much experience as IE but apparently just as sharp, and similar to IE, DB ranks at the top of the heap so to speak in the field according to write-ups and articles I read.
That said, after watching DB in action for a short time at the bond hearing, I wasn’t too impressed with him claiming that Mr. Morphew is “factually innocent!” Ummm no, he cannot possibly know that.
IMO his job is to ensure his client’s constitutional rights are protected, defend his client rigorously, try and poke holes in the state’s case, try to raise reasonable doubt etc. He can think or believe BM’s innocent all he wants, he’s entitled to think or believe whatever he wants. As if stating his client is “factually innocent” imo blunder no-no for a D Attorney to announce in open court wasn’t bad enough, DB then proceeds to get the last date BM had access to and used BAM wrong! by claiming BM last used BAM in 2018 in Indiana intimating he didn’t use it after he moved to Colorado. His own client told investigators he brought it with him from Indiana to Colorado when they moved and used it in CO, to sedate deer and cut their antlers off. Does DB think we’re all stupid and/or does he not know BM admitted that to investigators in the first case, and/or worse, was he aware of it and misleading the court?
(Rhetorical questions)
Looking a bit ahead, may the prosecution stay strong and bring their A game to go head to head with another high profile Defense Team defending the imo indefensible BM. I have much faith in the 12 JD District Attorney AK and her team, Godspeed to them throughout judicial proceedings. The BAM evidence is absolutely damning and considered with the additional mountain of other circumstantial evidence, I just cannot see a Jury not convicting BM as long as reasonable, rational, logical Jurors are seated, follows the evidence, can connect dots, and understands totality of evidence.
In the event BM decides to plea (I doubt the state will offer him one),
or offers a plea to the state, then trial and jury is moot. Personally I will be shocked if he pleads out for lesser sentence or whatever. One thing I feel fairly confident of is that BM does not want to go to prison, imo he’d likely rather be dead.
So my best guess is he’ll take his chances and hope his intelligent, aggressive DT- DB & JFB will get him off at trial aka acquitted. I think I have a better chance of winning the lottery than BM pleading out and/or being acquitted by a jury of his peers. I mean anything’s possible and as we know, Juries can be a wild card. Though we can guess which way a Jury may be leaning, no one knows for sure until the verdict is read in court. God forbid if it’s a Hung Jury/Mistrial don’t even like to think about that. Barring a plea, hoping we hear a future Jury hand down verdict that begins with a “G”(trying not to jinx it lol), followed by LWOP sentence, locked up and throw away the key so I can finally say bye, bye Barry, for good!
IMHOO
#JUSTICEFORSUZANNE
ETA- clarification as just read
@Cindizzi post. YT Dude is Jonathan Lee Riches and his YT channel is called “JLR investigates”. Investigator? Sure, sure, and I’m the Queen of England.
en.wikipedia.org
.
