Bravo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2011
- Messages
- 20,354
- Reaction score
- 64,600
Or he hare lips every cow in TexasI have a feeling Moran is going to talk…until the cows come home![]()
Or he hare lips every cow in TexasI have a feeling Moran is going to talk…until the cows come home![]()
Does MR have a relationship with the brother that was mentioned as being with him after Dylan went missing (DS, I believe and iirc he lived somewhere in the Midwest)? In trying to figure out the purpose of the co-worker witness who knew MR for mere months and seemingly had nothing of evidentiary value to add other than a glowing endorsement of MR as a father, it has me wondering why a family member who stayed at his house, saw him in the days/weeks/months after the 'disappearance', and knows him intimately would not be called by the defense. Although maybe I answered my question in asking it -- the brother, having actual information to contribute, might not be such a good character witness.
Yes, but can you imagine the wonderful and quite entertaining comments from Websleuthers.Do you think Moran can do a 2 1/2 hour closing…better yet, do you think we can make it through his 2 1/2 hour closing?
Actually, the prosecution was asking for this extension and the judge agreed. I didn’t hear anything from Moran on it though.
Remember MR doing interviews with a blonde reporter Melissa B. with KUSA 9News Denver in the beginning? When she asked what their plans were for Thanksgiving, MR said we hadn’t decided if we were going to stay at my house or go to my brothers in Castle Rock. That’s like 20 miles from Monument CO north of Colorado Springs. So if he just had the one brother, he was living in Colorado then. Would explain him being at MR house when the FBI visited . I’ve wondered if they were close then and NOW. Haven’t heard of anyone being at the trial for MR.Does MR have a relationship with the brother that was mentioned as being with him after Dylan went missing (DS, I believe and iirc he lived somewhere in the Midwest)? In trying to figure out the purpose of the co-worker witness who knew MR for mere months and seemingly had nothing of evidentiary value to add other than a glowing endorsement of MR as a father, it has me wondering why a family member who stayed at his house, saw him in the days/weeks/months after the 'disappearance', and knows him intimately would not be called by the defense. Although maybe I answered my question in asking it -- the brother, having actual information to contribute, might not be such a good character witness.
I don't think it will be a very long deliberation. Maybe 8 hours or so? I don't think this is a cliff hanger with a lot of reasonable doubt...We will be here through closing arguments, verdict-watch and verdict announcement. And, maybe afterwards. Like a dog with a bone, can't let go. Happy to have another trial addict onboard.
Since Judge said jury can deliberate Saturdays...
I am predicting the jury will deliberate Friday and part of Saturday, and will have a verdict on Saturday. Anyone else?
Wasn’t that question for the Dutch forensic expert? “Why did you take this case if you had a choice.” lolI don't think it will be a very long deliberation. Maybe 8 hours or so? I don't think this is a cliff hanger with a lot of reasonable doubt...
HOWEVER, I have no idea what the jury is like. They could be sticklers who find small slivers of possible doubt and glom on to it as proof of innocence---seen it before.
But I think if they are reasonable, logical types, they will see how the puzzle pieces fit together.
The juror questions seemed pretty logical and thoughtful. But there was one that seemed it might bother the defense---they asked one of the defense experts, can't remember which one right now---but the question was ' what made you want to take on this case?'
lmao----were they asking 'what the heck were you thinking? ' The judge said they could not answer it. lol
"Moran noted Dylan planned to meet a friend at 6:30 a.m. But instead of arriving at his friend’s house he was attacked and killed by animals."Just found this article about opening statements ( the day the audio was so bad pretty much all of it was unintelligible). Here’s some remarks Moran made that I wasn’t aware of:
Moran said the photos from “deep within” Redwine’s personal life were unsettling and have been revealed on national television, but he said the troubling photos were not enough to lead a father to kill his son.
Instead, Moran said, Dylan, already alienated from his father, likely left the house as early as he could on Nov. 19. Moran noted Dylan planned to meet a friend at 6:30 a.m. But instead of arriving at his friend’s house he was attacked and killed by animals.
“Mr. Redwine is a flawed individual, but Dylan had agency. Dylan took off,” Moran told the jury.
Evidence from skull central in Mark Redwine trial
I am kind of worried there are so many men. Are any of them going to sympathise with a divorced father, being victimised by his ex?Wasn’t that question for the Dutch forensic expert? “Why did you take this case if you had a choice.” lol
I would love to know age and occupations of the Jurors. I snipped this from one of @niners excellent summaries:
12 jurors & 4 alternates (11 men & 5 women). 1 juror was excused for having a fever (7/8/21). Now 10 men & 5 women on jury. 12 jurors & 3 alternates.
OTOH they may relate to having an abusive male in their life growing up. Or seeing a sister or Aunt go through it.I am kind of worried there are so many men. Are any of them going to sympathise with a divorced father, being victimised by his ex?