Found Deceased CO - Dylan Nicholas Redwine, 13, Vallecito, 19 Nov 2012 *father arrested*

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #201
Respectfully, as of at least Nov 2020, evidence suggests that the accused is still represented by two state public defenders - courtesy of Colorado taxpayers.

Justin Bogan, No. 33827
Deputy State Public Defender

John Moran, No. 36019
Deputy State Public Defender

https://www.courts.state.co.us/user...l_District/La_Plata/Redwine/Defense/D-180.pdf
Thank you for the information. I haven't followed too closely since he was charged and jailed.
Yours is good news. He's run out of money. No bail for Mark and no high priced attorney at his beck and call to harass Elaine. Life is better with that good for nothing behind bars.
I will be happy when this trial is over. Hopefully Mark will be found guilty and Elaine and Dylan,s brother can hopefully begin their life free of this continuing misery.
What a horrible man is Mark Redwine.
 
  • #202
Respectfully, as of at least Nov 2020, evidence suggests that the accused is still represented by two state public defenders - courtesy of Colorado taxpayers.

Justin Bogan, No. 33827
Deputy State Public Defender

John Moran, No. 36019
Deputy State Public Defender

https://www.courts.state.co.us/user...l_District/La_Plata/Redwine/Defense/D-180.pdf
Thank you for the information. I haven't followed too closely since he was charged and jailed.
Yours is good news. He's run out of money. No bail for Mark and no high priced attorney at his beck and call to harass Elaine. Life is better with that good for nothing behind bars.
I will be happy when this trial is over. Hopefully Mark will be found guilty and Elaine and Dylan,s brother can hopefully begin their life free of this continuing misery.
What a horrible man is Mark Redwine.
 
  • #203
I am so sickened that this is still on going. It’s just not fair on the family that this is still on going. I understand the pandemic can’t be helped but this has been delayed time and time again. How can the family have justice and move on when the wheels of of justice have failed Elaine and her family since 2012.
 
  • #204
Friday, May 14th:
*Pretrial Conference Hearing (@ 10am MT) - CO - Dylan Nicholas Redwine (13) (Nov. 19, 2012, Broomfield; found about 8 miles up Middle Mountain Road, a dirt road that cuts through the San Juan National Forest, about 100 yards from the road, directly off an ATV trail on June 27, 2013 & Nov. 1, 2015 his skull was found) - *Mark Allen Redwine (50 @ time of crime/55/now 58), "father" indicted (6/20/17) of 2nd degree murder & child abuse resulting in death. Plead not guilty. $750K bond.
Jury Trial began on 10/29/20 with jury selection & ended 11/5/20 after Judge Wilson declared mistrial on 11/9/20.
Re-Trial was reset to begin on 4/12/21 continued due to COVID to 6/14/21 (thru 8/2/21).
Previous court hearings from 9/10/17 thru 10/27/20 & Jury Selection (Day 1-6) 10/29/20 to 11/5/20 & 11/9/20 & info to 12/22/20 reference post #183 here:
Found Deceased - CO - Dylan Nicholas Redwine, 13, Broomfield, 19 Nov 2012 *father arrested*

1/5/21 Update: Redwine's latest trial was set to begin late this month on Jan. 25, however during a hearing Tuesday morning, the trial was moved back due to COVID & is now set to begin on Monday, April 12 thru May 28, 2021. A pretrial conference hearing is set for March 5.
3/5/21 Update: Judge Jeffery Wilson declared another mistrial on Friday. Judge Wilson said COVID-19 metrics in La Plata County have not changed enough to ensure a fair trial. The new trial date is set for 6/16/21 thru 8/2/21 & a pretrial conference hearing set for 5/14/21 @ 10am. Trial has been reset to start on 6/14/21 thru 8/2/21.
 
  • #205
  • #206
I'm not going to post all the jury trial dates - way too long....

Date Len Appearance Name Hearing Type Case # Location Division
6/14/21

8:00 AM 1D
REDWINE, MARK Jury Trial D342017CR343 La Plata County Division 1

thru
8/2/21
8:00 AM 1D
REDWINE, MARK Jury Trial D342017CR343 La Plata County Division 1


link: Seventh Judicial District » Docket Search
 
  • #207
Will we be able to watch this trial?
 
  • #208
Will we be able to watch this trial?
Colorado

Flag_of_Colorado_svg.png
Allows Cameras? Yes
Does Not Allow Cameras? No
Partial Allowance of Cameras? No
Audio or Video Webcast? Yes
Media Guide Available? No


Under Colorado Supreme Court Rules, Chapter 38, Rule 2, the judge may authorize expanded media coverage—defined as any photography or audio recording of proceedings—subject to several guidelines.

Judges have the power to prohibit expanded media coverage upon a finding of substantial likelihood of interference with a fair trial, a reasonable likelihood that coverage will detract from the solemnity, decorum, or dignity of the court, or that coverage will create unique, adverse effects, or harm which is distinct from that caused by coverage by other types of media. Those wishing to cover a particular proceeding must submit a written request to do so to the presiding judge at least one day in advance of the proceeding and must give a copy of the request to the counsel for each party participating in the proceeding. Coverage of jury selection, in camera hearings and most pre-trial hearings is prohibited. No close-up photography of the jury, bench conferences or attorney-client communication is permitted. Consent of the participants is not required. The judge may also terminate coverage if the terms of the rules or additional rules imposed by the Court have been violated. Only one still and one video camera operator (with up to two cameras, at the judge’s discretion) are allowed in the courtroom at one time. The camera operator may use a tripod but may not change positions while the court is in session. The media are responsible for arranging pooling agreements.

Authority: Colorado Supreme Court Rules, Chapter 38, Rule (http://www.courts.state.co.us/userf...Rule_Changes/2010/2010(14) strike and add.doc).
 
  • #209
  • #210
I don't see any motions here where any news people asked to be in the court room to film....

Colorado Judicial Branch - La Plata County - Homepage
From your link it looks like the court will stream it.

Order Regarding Requests for Expanded Media Coverage (C-56)

The Durango Herald and Court TV Media, LLC, have filed separate requests for expanded media coverage in this case. The Court denies both requests for audio and visual recording as the Court will provide audio and video streaming of all proceedings in this case after jury selection is complete via Webex Events. The streamed content may be captured, re-streamed, or broadcast live or at a later date. See the Court's Amended Courtroom Decorum Order During Trial (C-55)issued on this date.

The Court grants the Durango Herald's request for a still photographer after jury selection is complete with the followingrequirements:1. The photographer shall take still photographs of the trial each day the trial is in session except during jury selection;2. No jurors' faces shall be captured by the still photography, and;3. All photographs shall be made available to any media organization interested in this trial.

Issue Date:10/21/2020
JEFFREY RAYMOND WILSON
District Court Judge
DATE FILED: October 21, 2020 11:32 AM
 

Attachments

  • #211
Ah @Legally Bland - I didn't go that far back & did a quick scan.... :)
 
  • #212
From your link it looks like the court will stream it.

Order Regarding Requests for Expanded Media Coverage (C-56)

The Durango Herald and Court TV Media, LLC, have filed separate requests for expanded media coverage in this case. The Court denies both requests for audio and visual recording as the Court will provide audio and video streaming of all proceedings in this case after jury selection is complete via Webex Events. The streamed content may be captured, re-streamed, or broadcast live or at a later date. See the Court's Amended Courtroom Decorum Order During Trial (C-55)issued on this date.

The Court grants the Durango Herald's request for a still photographer after jury selection is complete with the followingrequirements:1. The photographer shall take still photographs of the trial each day the trial is in session except during jury selection;2. No jurors' faces shall be captured by the still photography, and;3. All photographs shall be made available to any media organization interested in this trial.

Issue Date:10/21/2020
JEFFREY RAYMOND WILSON
District Court Judge
DATE FILED: October 21, 2020 11:32 AM

This is great news!
 
  • #213
Date Len Appearance Name Hearing Type Case # Location Division
6/11/21
1:30 PM 1Hr IN PERSON REDWINE, MARK Pre-Trial Conference D342017CR343 La Plata County Division 1

6/14/21
8:00 AM 1D REDWINE, MARK Jury Trial D342017CR343 La Plata County Division 1

link: Seventh Judicial District » Docket Search
 
  • #214
Date Len Appearance Name Hearing Type Case # Location Division
6/11/21
1:30 PM 1Hr IN PERSON REDWINE, MARK Pre-Trial Conference D342017CR343 La Plata County Division 1

6/14/21
8:00 AM 1D REDWINE, MARK Jury Trial D342017CR343 La Plata County Division 1

link: Seventh Judicial District » Docket Search

I cannot wait!!!! I'd be so bummed if this was a trial for Twitter again! Rare for Colorado to allow cameras; I think COVID probably is what has changed only allowing arraignments to be filmed.
 
  • #215
From your link it looks like the court will stream it.

Order Regarding Requests for Expanded Media Coverage (C-56)

The Durango Herald and Court TV Media, LLC, have filed separate requests for expanded media coverage in this case. The Court denies both requests for audio and visual recording as the Court will provide audio and video streaming of all proceedings in this case after jury selection is complete via Webex Events. The streamed content may be captured, re-streamed, or broadcast live or at a later date. See the Court's Amended Courtroom Decorum Order During Trial (C-55)issued on this date.

The Court grants the Durango Herald's request for a still photographer after jury selection is complete with the followingrequirements:1. The photographer shall take still photographs of the trial each day the trial is in session except during jury selection;2. No jurors' faces shall be captured by the still photography, and;3. All photographs shall be made available to any media organization interested in this trial.

Issue Date:10/21/2020
JEFFREY RAYMOND WILSON
District Court Judge
DATE FILED: October 21, 2020 11:32 AM

Thank you for posting this. It’s been 8 1/2 years since Dylan was murdered. This trial needs to be broadcasted.
 
  • #216
Thank you for posting this. It’s been 8 1/2 years since Dylan was murdered. This trial needs to be broadcasted.

Isn't November 2012 to June 2021 about 9.5 years actually?

Finally, it has come. It has taken almost ten years to see justice for Dylan. 2012 was so long ago! I hope Dr. Phil interview and other interviews are used as evidence to show his narcissistic side.

I look forward to chatting with all of you during the trial!
 
  • #217
I wonder what Mark now looks like as he has been in prison awhile now.
 
  • #218
I wonder what Mark now looks like as he has been in prison awhile now.
Like sh*t...because you know what they say...you are what you eat:p
 
  • #219
I wonder what Mark now looks like as he has been in prison awhile now.

If I recall last he was putting on an "all-American, Boy Scout-leader look."
 
  • #220
Colorado

Flag_of_Colorado_svg.png
Allows Cameras? Yes
Does Not Allow Cameras? No
Partial Allowance of Cameras? No
Audio or Video Webcast? Yes
Media Guide Available? No


Under Colorado Supreme Court Rules, Chapter 38, Rule 2, the judge may authorize expanded media coverage—defined as any photography or audio recording of proceedings—subject to several guidelines.

Judges have the power to prohibit expanded media coverage upon a finding of substantial likelihood of interference with a fair trial, a reasonable likelihood that coverage will detract from the solemnity, decorum, or dignity of the court, or that coverage will create unique, adverse effects, or harm which is distinct from that caused by coverage by other types of media. Those wishing to cover a particular proceeding must submit a written request to do so to the presiding judge at least one day in advance of the proceeding and must give a copy of the request to the counsel for each party participating in the proceeding. Coverage of jury selection, in camera hearings and most pre-trial hearings is prohibited. No close-up photography of the jury, bench conferences or attorney-client communication is permitted. Consent of the participants is not required. The judge may also terminate coverage if the terms of the rules or additional rules imposed by the Court have been violated. Only one still and one video camera operator (with up to two cameras, at the judge’s discretion) are allowed in the courtroom at one time. The camera operator may use a tripod but may not change positions while the court is in session. The media are responsible for arranging pooling agreements.

Authority: Colorado Supreme Court Rules, Chapter 38, Rule (http://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Rule_Changes/2010/2010(14) strike and add.doc).

It's long understood that there are two important exceptions to Colorado Rule 2 /Supreme Court Chap 38 for criminal courts including that the Judge may consider authorizing expanded media coverage only for Advisements and Arraignments.

The following was omitted from OP's linked quote:

(3) Limitations on Expanded Media Coverage. Notwithstanding an authorization to conduct expanded media coverage of a proceeding, there shall be no:

(A) Expanded media coverage of pretrial hearings in criminal cases, except advisements and arraignments;

(B) Expanded media coverage of jury voir dire;

(C) Audio recording or “zoom” close-up photography of bench conferences;

(D) Audio recording or close-up photography of communications between counsel and client or between co-counsel;

(E) Expanded media coverage of in camera hearings;

(F) Close-up photography of members of the jury.
__________

ETA: Specific only to the Colorado trial of Mark Redwine - citing the COVID Pandemic, limited courtroom space, and the heightened level of interest by the public and media interest in this case, and the inherent right of the media to observe the criminal case, the Court Amended the Courtroom Decorum Order by Order #55 dated Oct 21, 2020.

The Order specifically provides that the Court will arrange to provide video/audio coverage of the trial (i.e., therefore denies any requests for audio and video streaming, broadcasting, or recording by the media).

This Order is similar to the exception the Colorado court made for the James Holmes Trial (2012 Aurora mass murder) when the court made arrangements for court-controlled CCTV inside the courtroom.

See the link for more details about the coverage allowance and exceptions cited for the 2020 trial prior to the mistrial.

https://www.courts.state.co.us/user...h_Judicial_District/La_Plata/Redwine/C-55.pdf

Colorado Judicial Branch - La Plata - Cases of Interest - PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO v. MARK REDWINE - VOLUME V
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
162
Guests online
2,801
Total visitors
2,963

Forum statistics

Threads
632,139
Messages
18,622,645
Members
243,032
Latest member
beccabelle70
Back
Top