CO- Dylan Redwine, 13, Vallecito, 19 November 2012 - #14

[FlyerFan28]

It has been established in MSM and discussed here at the time that both parents have referred to Dylan in past tense. I think it means nothing. Maybe others think they are in cahoots on Dylan's disappearance since both used the same tense.

It can be unimportant to you and important to me. We're allowed to express & share opinions.

 

[oceanblueeyes]

Mike Hall is with ER now.
http://www.gazette.com/articles/mother-148069-polygraph-takes.html
picture only with name

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap...-AkuuA?docId=df68db79d76247e0b8adb8aea7b6bc83
article with name
AP article cannot c/p

So she divorced Mark and went back and remarried her ex?

imo

 

[DylansMom34]

Maybe her ex husband saved her from an abusive dysfunctional marriage? MOO

 

[oceanblueeyes]

I just got direction from the owners.

Elaine Redwine is not sleuthable. HOWEVER, you guys can sleuth to find out if the man Elaine is married to now is the same man she was married to prior to Mark Redwine. That is relevant.

PLEASE BE CAREFUL. If in doubt, do not post it. We do not want to expose an innocent man with the same name who has absolutley nothing to do with ER or MR.


No bashing of Elaine or her current husband or prior husband. (Hope that makes sense because this is getting confusing and I feel like I'm talking in circles here. lol) And no sleuthing further than determining if her ex and current husband are the same man.

Thanks.

I dont think anyone is going to bash Elaine nor her current husband but it is relevant imo because no one has been ruled out........not even the family members on Elaine's side of the family.

I do wonder though how many family members were asked to take polys.

If he is her husband now has he been seen at any of the vigils with her or interviewed in the media or helped them in the searches?

IMO

 

[Confusion]

So rediculous that several days after the fact, the 30 second question and answer between NG & Elaine regarding Mark's lie detector test get hashed and rehashed over and over and over.

How many times has a single comment by MR gone through the same thing?

 

[oceanblueeyes]

I watched that NG show and I had the feeling that maybe she had been asked by LE to not discuss the LDT, didn't know how to answer or avoid some of the questions, and also tell the public she passed and dads was inconclusive.
Jmo

I dont believe for one second LE discussed with her the results of any poly except her own.

 

[Seajay]

So rediculous that several days after the fact, the 30 second question and answer between NG & Elaine regarding Mark's lie detector test get hashed and rehashed over and over and over.

I think it does because it keeps being brought up inasmuch as claiming Mark Redwine's was inconclusive. That's been used as a talking point several times, so we always have to go back to what else she said about it at the same time. It become relevant each time someone wants to use it as a mean to prove MR did not pass his poly.

Besides, hasn't just about EVERYTHING having to do with this case been hashed and rehashed over and over and over??? Like the phone pings, the phone being off at 8 pm, like whether Dylan was at MR's house that night???

 

[kkdj]

I would think something of it if I had not heard other innocent parents use past tense.

IMO

I hear ya! I'm just on the fence and yet felt so sad when dad said he was his world. Too soon IMO to say that. It's just what I felt.
But I know mom and Cory both used past tense also, but she thought dad had done something. So I took it differently, like a fear. I'm not saying I'm right, just that what they said I felt came from different places.
But I'm not casting stones yet. Just thinking out loud.

 

[Abby Normal Again]

Maybe her ex husband saved her from an abusive dysfunctional marriage? MOO

(eta- jumping off, not a reply)

If we're speculating, maybe she never left the cycle of abusive men. At some point she presumably saw MR as an improvement. It's impossible to tell.

It's relevant, but only to the extent it may have impacted Dylan. At some point it's her prerogative. Maybe it's already that point. I'd just to know he's had his time accounted for and maybe a poly, at that point I'd love to see the topic dropped, because it's none of our beeswax as long as it didn't impact Dylan's disappearance. Of course, LE isn't speaking. Heh.

 

[shefner]

Is it against TOS to say I wish we could fully discuss both parents? I don't think mom had anything to do with this...but understanding more about her life might lead us to something. But I do respect the rules.
Its hard, isn't it, to run out of things to talk about?

Dylan....where are you? Christmas is coming and we need you home!

 

[kkdj]

I dont believe for one second LE discussed with her the results of any poly except her own.

I agree with you. That's not what I said.

 

[nannymo]

http://www.gazette.com/articles/missing-148311-monument-search.html

Investigators say that of dozens of items flagged by searchers, 10 were collected for future reference in the case.

Read more: http://www.gazette.com/articles/missing-148311-monument-search.html#ixzz2EhfAbVzp

BBM-I think this speaks volumes. MOO

 

[NC Analyzer]

Thanks.

I dont think anyone is going to bash Elaine nor her current husband but it is relevant imo because no one has been ruled out........not even the family members on Elaine's side of the family.

I do wonder though how many family members were asked to take polys.

If he is her husband now has he been seen at any of the vigils with her or interviewed in the media or helped them in the searches?

IMO

They are not currently married. He is referred to as her fiance'. Apparently he did participate in the search on Sat and it was also reported that he accompanied her on the ride down to Bayfield when mom was notified of Dylan's absence.

http://www.gazette.com/articles/mother-148069-polygraph-takes.html

 

[DylansMom34]

Yes I've seen her fiance at interviews (the first picture) and I've also read on the Find Dylan facebook page many references to him taking part in searches. I'd say he has been extremely involved in trying to find Dylan. Much more visible than Mark was those first several days. MOO

 

[cluciano63]

Investigators say that of dozens of items flagged by searchers, 10 were collected for future reference in the case.

Read more: http://www.gazette.com/articles/missing-148311-monument-search.html#ixzz2EhfAbVzp

BBM-I think this speaks volumes. MOO

I don't. I think they just collected everything they found and will test it all and hang on to it. But I doubt any of it is relevant and that is just my opinion. I think if they really thought they had found something relevant, they would be back out there searching every inch.

 

[dlc]

So she divorced Mark and went back and remarried her ex?

imo

That's a good question, and I admit I am totally confused at this point. IMO his name is not unique enough to make that determination, or at least not from what I've seen posted.

My goodness this is baffling.

 

[DylansMom34]

Not gonna take part in dissecting any marriage or divorce. None of us were with any of these people during marriages, divorces, etc. To me none of it is as important as can these people come together to find Dylan.

It was good to FINALLY hear that all of them did participate in the search last weekend. The investigation and searches should remain squarely focused on Dylan and not dissecting marriages/divorces/blah blah blah. MOO

 

[white rabbit]

in response to beach, et al...my apologies.

i am most certainly not sleuthing (publically) ER nor MR. but with a whole lot of research, none of which is approved as per TOS, it's pretty easy to ascertain what went on in that family.

attorneys retained by both parties are a matter of public record, and with mod approval i will post.

IMO, JMO, MOO, et cetera...

 

[Ransom]

They are not currently married. He is referred to as her fiance'. Apparently he did participate in the search on Sat and it was also reported that he accompanied her on the ride down to Bayfield when mom was notified of Dylan's absence.

http://www.gazette.com/articles/mother-148069-polygraph-takes.html

The picture that shows ER and MH kissing is from Nov. 26th not from this Sat. If you can find somewhere that he was there this Sat, I would like to see it. I didn't see him but I did see ER, CR and MR. Thanks

 

[beach]

Is it against TOS to say I wish we could fully discuss both parents? I don't think mom had anything to do with this...but understanding more about her life might lead us to something. But I do respect the rules.
Its hard, isn't it, to run out of things to talk about?

Dylan....where are you? Christmas is coming and we need you home!

It is hard. This happens in a lot of cases though.


Sorry, but Elaine is not sleuthable further than what I posted prior.

We can discuss dates of marriages, divorces, and birthdates of the kids so we can try to understand the family dynamic. However, we can not cross the line into assuming or accusing if the lines get blurry and cross within those dates. There are innocent kids involved here. They will be protected at all costs. No need to cause them any embarrassment or more distress than they are all already under.