- Joined
- May 4, 2011
- Messages
- 114
- Reaction score
- 769
So much has gone on that I cannot remember... PLEASE help me...
Has big brother Nick been to the searches? With mom?
Has big brother Nick been to the searches? With mom?
Normal by whose definition?
Well, in law, there is such a thing as the "reasonable person".
I would say a "reasonable person" who didn't know where his son went to, would stay in contact with the other parent who knows him better, is worried to death, and hundreds of miles away.
Well, in law, there is such a thing as the "reasonable person".
I would say a "reasonable person" who didn't know where his son went to, would stay in contact with the other parent who knows him better, is worried to death, and hundreds of miles away.
I would think he would have asked her if she knew of any friends he might be with, and if he had told her what he planned to do while he was visiting. Surely she knew MORE about who his friends were than he did, since he was away a lot. My DH never knew many of our kid's friends from school except for the ones which came to sleepovers etc. Whereas I knew all of them since I dropped them off or went to practices, rehearsals etc.
My DH would not know where to look if one of our kids took off somewhere, but I would know whose homes to go to and where the kids hung out. So I do find it odd that MR did not call and talk more in depth with ER early on.
BBM THIS has been bothering me a lot. I went to McD's for the first time in years the other day. It was the longest drive-through experience ever... long story... but back to Dylan, I had plenty of time to watch the surveillance monitors inside where the drive-through employees were taking orders. The video quality was amazing, I couldn't believe how good. I don't know for sure but I would think those videos would be recorded? And I imagine most McD's would have video cameras, right? For that matter it seems there should be more in Walmart, but maybe this was the best still shot they could get.
Reasonable by whose definition? What law was broken by not responding to her messages? Obviously I'm not a reasonable person by your definition, so why try to convince me of anything? :waitasec:
BBMI never said that. I do think that sometimes you bring up arguments that are not as reasonable as I would agree with, but we don't have a jury of 12 judging that, so you may be totally reasonable, and I may be totally off base. <SNIP>
BBMSNIP>
I would say a "reasonable person" who didn't know where his son went to, would stay in contact with the other parent who knows him better, is worried to death, and hundreds of miles away.
He was home between 7 and 8 that night (I never bothered to check the clock.) I had been at home, just in case, from about 4:00. He should have been home shortly after 3:00. Not only did I not freak out and run around like a madwoman as people seem to think I should have, it never even occurred to me that I should notify his father.
I guess those of us who don't find his actions that unusual are in a very small minority here. If I had been in his place, I would probably/possibly asked her if she'd heard from him; once she said no and asked why, I'd probably just say I'd explain later. I think he was probably already under enough stress trying to figure out what happened, what to do, where else he could be, etc., and the last thing he needed was an angry woman, who already hates him, wasting his time by accusing him of being irresponsible or worse, and asking him the same questions he was asking himself. MOO
BBM. I have tried to keep up, but admittedly am behind. I feel like I am reading the same thing over and over anyway, though, so, frankly, it gets tiresome for me.
It seems to have moved from pure speculation to fact that MR did not return ER's texts the day Dylan went missing because ER was not nice to MR in her text back to him. Not just in your post, but in many posts I am seeing now. My question is this: Do we actually know what was in those texts? If we do, I missed it, and would really like a link, please.
BBM: I have not seen it anywhere that she got in her car and went over to his home or to anywhere he was and attempted to speak to him. The road goes both ways IMO.......
ETA: he has provided info to LE, as stated in numerous MSM articles that are available in the timeline forum.
Normal by whose definition?
Frankly, I don't know, and I really don't think it's important to anything here. I have been trying to avoid discussing anything related to MR at all, but it's not possible with the circumstances what they are. Because of that, I try ignoring the insults and accusations about him, and usually most of the things that have already been discussed for about 50 pages. Sometimes I give in and comment, so I guess I can't complain if other people do too. Do we know that she was angry and accusatory in her texts that day? No. Do we know if he gave her any information about what was going on there? No. Do we know if Cory just sent a message asking what's going on, or if it was one complaining about him not responding to Elaine? No. Do any of these things really matter? No. MOO
I remember in the heat of the moment what I did and what my current husband did. My Ex and what his new wife did. We went Mach 90. My Mom was just white noise in the background telling me constantly if "You" dont find my Granddaughters i will never forgive you. Like it was my fault :waitasec: My Brother was involved in the desicion to let them walk a well worn Family path. I was pleading with park officials to go back with the ATV's Meanwhile Mom is behind me berating. Did i care? No. We had LE involved. Helicopters etc. Eventually My current Husband. My Ex. And my Brother found them. Clinging to a tree. Crying. Had shared a piece of gum. Had at least a hundred bug bites. And they were thankful to be found as they were about to eat bark LOL
BBMFrankly, I don't know, and I really don't think it's important to anything here. I have been trying to avoid discussing anything related to MR at all, but it's not possible with the circumstances what they are. Because of that, I try ignoring the insults and accusations about him, and usually most of the things that have already been discussed for about 50 pages. Sometimes I give in and comment, so I guess I can't complain if other people do too. Do we know that she was angry and accusatory in her texts that day? No. Do we know if he gave her any information about what was going on there? No. Do we know if Cory just sent a message asking what's going on, or if it was one complaining about him not responding to Elaine? No. Do any of these things really matter? No. MOO
BBM: So you shut her off, you ignored her "noise", you didn't deal with her?? Isn't that what Mark did when Elaine and/or Cory called him??? If she chewed him a new one, why would he continue to volunteer for that??? I wouldn't. I've have too much else I'm doing, too much else I'm going through to indulge someone who is irate and thinks I have to hear it going off on me. Nope, I would avoid them like the plague. You have to remember IF Mark had NOTHING to do with his son's disappearance and it's as he said it was, he's a devastated parent as well. He has feelings as well, he's upset as well. He did not need to be verbally abused by someone else because that's what they needed to do to get through it. He is no longer "her person" to go to for "feelings."
BBM. I have tried to keep up, but admittedly am behind. I feel like I am reading the same thing over and over anyway, though, so, frankly, it gets tiresome for me.
It seems to have moved from pure speculation to fact that MR did not return ER's texts the day Dylan went missing because ER was not nice to MR in her text back to him. Not just in your post, but in many posts I am seeing now. My question is this: Do we actually know what was in those texts? If we do, I missed it, and would really like a link, please.