mysticrose
The key to change... is to let go of fear
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2009
- Messages
- 8,436
- Reaction score
- 159
Colorado is notorious for being tight lipped about cases, it can get really aggravating.........
I really wish more parents taught their kids to stand up for themselves and be proactive. Dylan is 13 years old, he's not a baby. If he really didn't want to visit his dad he should have been told that flat out refusal was an option. You can't put a kicking screaming teenager on an airplane and the judge wouldn't toss his mother in jail for violating a court order, if he stood his ground.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So according to Google map, it appears that the nearest reservation, Ignacio, is about 24.8 total miles from Vallecito or County Road 501 (1 hour 1 minute).
Broken down: From Vallecito to Bayfield, it's 12.9 miles (33 minutes) and then from Bayfield to Ignacio it is another 11.9 miles (28 minutes).
It's not nearly as close as I imagined it was.
Again I was behind, but out of curiosity is Redwine a NA name? I only ask because I have heard someone say that she thought about sending her kid to live on a reservation so the dad would never see the kid. She didn't. But could that really happen? Or would the FBI be able to go to the reservation? I'm just throwing around ideas. I think this is highly unlikely. Just a mere thought.
HEY '' FBI is not real good at keeping the public informed ''
I wonder if the FBI would give anyone any info if called
and asked? Can you do that sorta thing? Just call up the
fbi and ask for info ? I mean we've been waiting on local
LE and nothing,but who's to say fbi would be so tight lipped ?
Again I was behind, but out of curiosity is Redwine a NA name? I only ask because I have heard someone say that she thought about sending her kid to live on a reservation so the dad would never see the kid. She didn't. But could that really happen? Or would the FBI be able to go to the reservation? I'm just throwing around ideas. I think this is highly unlikely. Just a mere thought.
Exactly, they won't say anything concrete. They say the parents "aren't suspects" yet "nobody has been ruled out".
All we know is they suspect foul play, and they don't have strong enough evidence/suspicions to announce a suspect, leaving the entire community and world to worry and wonder if there's a child predator at large.
Really, by saying they believe foul play was involved, what they're saying is that there's AT BEST a child killer in the community, and at worst there's a serial sexual predator in the community.
I say that because we've been told there's foul play.... foul play for a 13 year old boy either means he's been hurt and left for dead, he's been killed, or he's being held by a sexual predator.
IMHO.
I don't get the whys of the theory, but likewise I'd be interested in hearing thoughts
Are there any cases where a child has been hidden for over a month when on an access visit?
BBM
http://www.ancestry.com/name-origin?view=1&surname=redwine
Per Ancestry.com it is an "Americanized form of South German Rettwein"
I think they are looking at prison time, if this actually happened. You don't steal a child, even your own, and then stand by while LE and FBI, etc. raise an expensive criminal investigation. Also, neither parent can legally withhold the child from the other. I would imagine a list of charges could be brought.
Not to mention, I still do not see the original point of doing so, even if it was a stupid one.
I do not get why people do not believe Elaine when she said Dylan did not want to visit his dad.
This is the same child who landed and texted mum with a unhappy frown face .
The same child who had made plans to spend the first night with friends instead of dad.
The same child who when was not allowed to visit that night made plans for 6.30am the following morning .
IMO Dylan could not want to get away from MR first thing.
None of these actions speak of Dylan wanting to spend time with dad !
MOO,IMHO
Right.
Not arguing with what you said, but we all know people who do stupid things and don't consider the consequences down the road. People who do things on a whim, out of anger, resentment, whatever, even knowing they're breaking the law but at that moment, just too worked up to think about the wrong they're doing and what it will cost them later.
If every person in the world followed the law, or even had the foresight to think before they act, we wouldn't have so many overcrowded prisons.
I don't know if that theory of someone hiding Dylan is plausible or not, but other parents have tried it and a few have probably succeeded, for awhile.
That is always a consideration. Intimidation. I don't remember what kept Jaycee under control. I think she was brainwashed. Then after she had her children, she wouldn't leave them behind so she stayed, even if she had a chance to leave. Since she wasn't fully developed mentally, she never got the maturity to think that if she could escape and report it, her children would be taken out of there and she would have them with her. Poor thing.
I really wish more parents taught their kids to stand up for themselves and be proactive. Dylan is 13 years old, he's not a baby. If he really didn't want to visit his dad he should have been told that flat out refusal was an option. You can't put a kicking screaming teenager on an airplane and the judge wouldn't toss his mother in jail for violating a court order, if he stood his ground.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk