- Joined
- Jun 14, 2010
- Messages
- 3,085
- Reaction score
- 24,083
is there an article or link regarding the "throwing around a football sunday night" story? i can't seem to find it.
thanks in advance!
thanks in advance!
Exactly and IMO it could not be any clearer to come to a conclusion. These days one is connected to their phone like it is part of one.
I would think if he was truly a bad guy capable of murdering his child, we'd be hearing a lot more from the locals. It would be a juicy story for any reporter and I'd think they'd be all over that exclusive headline.
I agree that ex wife's and even husbands do not always sing each other's praise but they also do not normally come out and say that they think there ex partner is capable of murder .
There is not liking each other and then ' that'
What do you have to be like as a human that people can suspect you of murdering your own son ??
IMO !!
It does amaze me just how folks today are tapped into their phones. Especially teens and twentyish age ranges. In the grocery store. At the Dr.'s office etc. etc. Drives me crazy at work. Cells are suppose to be shut off and used at break times. I don't know how many times i holler out. Somebody's purse is ringing, buzzing,dinging or playing a tune :waitasec: I like being technologically challenged. To a degree.
I just saw the news of the 2 Georgia boys found safe and sound. The CNN report stated a Patron at the Motel spotted the boys and called it in. So c'mon LE if u really thing Dylan was abducted we need pressers and Dylan needs some face time.
What drives me nuts is when I'm in a restaurant and people are on their cell.
Seriously? You can't stay off your phone through a meal? I just think it's rude.
I guess I am showing my age. jmo and all that.
That's a good question. My answer is, you don't have to BE anything beyond being the ex of an angry, bitter woman who obviously hates your guts.
I'm not saying this is who or what she is, because I don't know her. I'm just saying that there are women in this world who have come out of a bad marriage, so bitter and angry that they believe the ex is capable of anything, including murder. Put that together with a child missing, and it's not unusual that she could think that. But it doesn't make it true.
That's a good question. My answer is, you don't have to BE anything beyond being the ex of an angry, bitter woman who obviously hates your guts.
I'm not saying this is who or what she is, because I don't know her. I'm just saying that there are women in this world who have come out of a bad marriage, so bitter and angry that they believe the ex is capable of anything, including murder. Put that together with a child missing, and it's not unusual that she could think that. But it doesn't make it true.
Imagine if he had returned those calls and somehow comforted her ,, just a little. Would she have made those statements about him? That may be what tipped in her mind to thinking he had something to do with it. He's avoiding me out of guilt, type of thing. You know how when a friend or family is caught red handed, they often dont' return calls. I'm thinking right now of a person who owes money and returns ZERO calls or texts because they KNOW they are wrong. So could be that 's what made her think OMG he must be guilty of something or he would just answer me !
BBM
Do you really think that the MAJORITY of people believed Jessica Ridgeway and Marlene Lamar and Ed Smart were involved in their kids's disappearance? I don't believe that.
Maybe in the Lunsford case, because the grandparents failed a bunch of poly's and because it seemed impossible that no one would hear an intruder when there was a dog inside the home. And in the Groene case it was because of the drug connection, the party in the home that night, and the pitbulls that made people think it had to be someone the family knew.
But I don't think it was because of how they 'looked' that some were suspicious. JMO
ETA: I think the majority of the people in the Smart case thought that the handyman he had hired was the guilty party---the one that had stolen something in the past...
I am not so sure that they did keep him for hours in the first couple of days. I think they assumed that Dylan was missing or lost in the woods, or had run off somewhere. I don't think they kept Dad for long or interrogated him at the beginning. I think they went at this like a SEARCH and RESCUE mission for a boy lost in the woods. JMO
ETA: The reason I say that is because they never did any kind of thorough search of Dad's home at the start of the case.
The city of Durango has all of five detectives.
The county itself only has six investigators.
Dozens?