Which Elaine denies
IMO - the fact the DR went missing immediately (and not a situation where he just didn't return home at the end of the trip) and that there were no def T'day plans indicates it was premeditated. Maybe it was done immediately so that the perp didn't lose his nerve (by spending too much time with DR and feeling too bonded to make him disappear).
I wonder how much food was purchased at Walmart. Was it enough for a man and a boy for a week including T'day, or was it just to get through a day or so? That would shed light on intent/premeditation.
Weird that, since MR had an extra day to prepare for DR's arrival, after the Sat night flight got delayed, that MR had not done any food shopping for the boy's visit until he actually arrived.
I am not at all experienced but even I know MR's story makes no sense . It is full of holes <Mod Snip>.
MOO
IMO - the fact the DR went missing immediately (and not a situation where he just didn't return home at the end of the trip) and that there were no def T'day plans indicates it was premeditated. Maybe it was done immediately so that the perp didn't lose his nerve (by spending too much time with DR and feeling too bonded to make him disappear).
I wonder how much food was purchased at Walmart. Was it enough for a man and a boy for a week including T'day, or was it just to get through a day or so? That would shed light on intent/premeditation.
Weird that, since MR had an extra day to prepare for DR's arrival, after the Sat night flight got delayed, that MR had not done any food shopping for the boy's visit until he actually arrived.
It looks to me like Elaine is unsure about texting at Mark's place. She says "seemed to" "seem like". She doesn't state it declaratively -
GRACE: What`s this business about bad cell reception in that area? Was there bad cell reception? Did you have a problem hearing from him back on Labor Day, the last time he had visited his dad?
REDWINE: You know, there is bad cell reception, but texts always seemed to come through. So while you can`t necessarily speak with someone on the phone...
GRACE: That`s true.
REDWINE: ... it doesn`t seem like I ever had an issue getting texts from Dylan up there.
Please forgive me if this has already been asked, but are there any further searched planned for this month?
Also, it is safe to assume that in an investigation like this extended family members and friends have been interviewed? is that part of what the FBI does?
And, does anyone know if police depts throughout the country would have Dylan's image and pertinent details about his case?
Thanks.
In my mind, my questions aren't concerning Thanksgiving entrees, they are simply availability of food for a 13 year old to eat while he is staying with his dad in an isolated location.
Concerning Thanksgiving specifically, I really don't care WHAT they eat, just that they DO eat and that there was care for Dylan involved in the planning for that.
And yes, I know some people have pointed out that some "men" just don't pay attention to those basic needs. I fortunately have know many men who do; they are quite caring and nurturing. Maybe that is why I notice the difference between nurturing and indifference. We don't know which way MR leaned, if there was a leaning at all. I'd love to know though.
Any behaviors MR exhibited that point to his being a caring and loving father would be MOST welcome.
IMO anyone who premeditates the murder of their child is IMO a pretty cold person and likely wouldn't bond with their victim. IMO Also, considering that there's no evidence that we know of and the constant hashing of the cell phone activity, surely he would smart enough to have covered that in his evil plotting. JMO
Can we stop with the attacks on other posters? I thought that was made clear on page one of this thread.
MR was taking Dylan from his mothers home for Thanksgiving. A family holiday. He had no plans for them other than they 'might' drive 6 hours to his brothers house to eat dinner.
That just never set right with me.
IMO - the fact the DR went missing immediately (and not a situation where he just didn't return home at the end of the trip) and that there were no def T'day plans indicates it was premeditated. Maybe it was done immediately so that the perp didn't lose his nerve (by spending too much time with DR and feeling too bonded to make him disappear).
Many of us don't speak in the same tone as others.
MR was taking Dylan from his mothers home for Thanksgiving. A family holiday. He had no plans for them other than they 'might' drive 6 hours to his brothers house to eat dinner.
That just never set right with me.
MR was taking Dylan from his mothers home for Thanksgiving. A family holiday. He had no plans for them other than they 'might' drive 6 hours to his brothers house to eat dinner.
That just never set right with me.
MR is Dylan's family too. If it was his turn to the holiday he has a right to see his son. Mom's don't automatically get full custody and every holiday just by virtue of being a mom.
Yes, it sucks and it sounds harsh, but this is something many, many, many broken families have to deal with on a regular basis.
I don't know how organized MR thinks in terms of what to do when someone visits, but one would certainly expect if he went to court to have Dylan with him on a holiday, he would have made plans for the holiday to be a special time together. Otherwise, why be so insistent on a holiday?
Jmo
I think it could have had more to do with spending the week with him rather than the actual "holiday" with him. Dylan goes to school. He had that time off school for a week. It gives Mark the chance to see his son and spend some time with him, as per his plans about bowling, etc. I think he just wanted to hang out with him and give him the opportunity to see his buddies.
I doubt it was about cooking a turkey and all the trimmings. That's such a girl thing and so not a man thing.