CO- Dylan Redwine, 13, Vallecito, 19 November 2012 - #24

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #41
There has been absolutely no proof of Dylan arriving at that house .


And i am sure the time line of the facebook page states the phone was switched off Sunday night. If anybody knows they do IMO.

Okay, one more before I leave. How would they know unless they were there? TIA
 
  • #42
Okay, one more before I leave. How would they know unless they were there? TIA

Exactly. :wink: How would they know, unless they were there.
 
  • #43
When did it stop pinging? And please cite a MSM article which states when the phone stopped 'pinging.'

I think it still pings even after its powered off the phone has to have the battery removed or its smashed.

If that phone was still pinging LE would have some idea where he was that night.

JMO
 
  • #44
There is no proof that Dylan didn't arrive at the house.

And the Facebook page is not MSM.

Is there any proof that he arrived at the house?
 
  • #45
There is no proof that Dylan didn't arrive at the house.

And the Facebook page is not MSM.

Is there evidence he arrived at the house?

Did he use the home phone, the computer, leave hairs behind in a brush? Any of those things would be some evidence he was actually there.

I'd feel much better about the stranger abduction theory if we could prove he at least arrived at the house. (not that something couldn't have gone awry even afterward, but I don't think anything happened in the house.)
 
  • #46
  • #47
There is no proof that Dylan didn't arrive at the house.

And the Facebook page is not MSM.

The FB page is not msm, true.

But reportedly, the investigators on this case have been giving first hand information to the administrators and to Elaine, as a way to keep the locals updated. One reason they have been feeding them info is as a way to get important tips from the locals and as a way for the locals to know what to look out for and what to look into.

So far their info has been very accurate, imo.
 
  • #48
There is no proof that Dylan didn't arrive at the house.

And the Facebook page is not MSM.

And show me the proof he did arrive there ?




Okay, one more before I leave. How would they know unless they were there? TIA

Because they are in contact and are friends of Elaine and if somebody knows the facts it should be the victim's family who are in contact with LE IMO .
 
  • #49
Did he use the home phone, the computer, leave hairs behind in a brush? Any of those things would be some evidence he was actually there.

If there was evidence that Dylan logged into the computer, people would say MR just used his passwords.

If there was evidence that Dylan used the home phone, people would say it was MR trying to set up the crime.

If there were hairs in a brush, people would say MR planted it.
 
  • #50
Question:

We know that the police have stated that all the RSO have alibis.

Say that one of the alibis didn't check out. The police think perhaps that RSO did the crime, but there isn't enough to arrest the RSO yet.

Would they make a statement saying that an RSO was under suspicion? Or would they say that all the alibis checked out to make sure the RSO didn't high tail it out of town?

If one or more of the RSOs had a shaky alibi, I think they'd say just what they said. Note that he doesn't specify the quality or reliability of the alibis, or even if they have verified them -

Phippen said all of the local registered sex offenders had been checked out and had alibis for the 48-hour period from when Dylan arrived at the airport to the time he was reported missing.
 
  • #51
The FB page is not msm, true.

But reportedly, the investigators on this case have been giving first hand information to the administrators and to Elaine, as a way to keep the locals updated. One reason they have been feeding them info is as a way to get important tips from the locals and as a way for the locals to know what to look out for and what to look into.

So far their info has been very accurate, imo.

That doesn't mean that information is correct. MSM please. We don't rely on you-know-what.com and we shouldn't rely on uncited FB posts either, because they could have made the very same assumption that the lack of Dylan texting after 8pm meant that the phone must have been turned off.
 
  • #52
Ring around the rosey...
 
  • #53
If there was evidence that Dylan logged into the computer, people would say MR just used his passwords.

If there was evidence that Dylan used the home phone, people would say it was MR trying to set up the crime.

If there were hairs in a brush, people would say MR planted it.

If Dylan used the phone, he would have spoken to someone or left a message. Then we would know he was actually there.

I doubt MR knew DR's passwords, but, you never know I guess.

If there were hairs in a brush, I would not think MR planted it.

There is nothing...just nothing that shows he may have been there.
 
  • #54
If there was evidence that Dylan logged into the computer, people would say MR just used his passwords.

If there was evidence that Dylan used the home phone, people would say it was MR trying to set up the crime.

If there were hairs in a brush, people would say MR planted it.


Really? Could some people not be out to frame MR and just want answers to find Dylan, just maybe?
 
  • #55
If Dylan used the phone, he would have spoken to someone or left a message. Then we would know he was actually there.

I doubt MR knew DR's passwords, but, you never know I guess.

If there were hairs in a brush, I would not think MR planted it.

There is nothing...just nothing that shows he may have been there.

"Dylan" could have made a call to a number that only Dylan would have bothered calling, and then hung up while it was ringing.

MR could have forced DR to give up his passwords.

MR could certainly have taken hairs off Dylan's body and put them in a brush.

My point is that if LE stated any of this, people would just pick it apart and claim that MR was trying to cover his tracks. MOO
 
  • #56
If there was evidence that Dylan logged into the computer, people would say MR just used his passwords.

If there was evidence that Dylan used the home phone, people would say it was MR trying to set up the crime.

If there were hairs in a brush, people would say MR planted it.

There are things in this case that do not add up fact!!


Also that is the reason why we can speak about MR and his actions unlike other family member's. Its because things do not add up!
 
  • #57
Paul R. I know we differ in opinions about what happened after Dylan arrived, but I would like to hear your theory? Thanks *I don't mean this to sound sarcastic or anything, I really am interested to hear what you think...
 
  • #58
Also that is the reason why we can speak about MR and his actions unlike other family member's. Its because things do not add up!

AFAIK the only reason we are allowed to "sleuth" MR is because he is the last person known to have seen DR alive.

"There's no proof he was there" does not imply "There is proof that he was not there."
[ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirming_a_disjunct"]Affirming a disjunct - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]
 
  • #59
"Dylan" could have made a call to a number that only Dylan would have bothered calling, and then hung up while it was ringing.

MR could have forced DR to give up his passwords.

MR could certainly have taken hairs off Dylan's body and put them in a brush.

My point is that if LE stated any of this, people would just pick it apart and claim that MR was trying to cover his tracks. MOO

I'm talking about a phone call, a conversation, or at least a message. Is it that out of the question that *if* for whatever reason Dylan's phone was not working, that he wouldn't use the home phone?

I'm not sure MR could have forced DR to give up his pw's. And I don't think anyone here would make those accusations without some reason to think that.

Most people who accidentally kill, or even plan to kill don't plant hairs in hairbrushes.

Which is why those things would make me feel better about whether or not he was there.
 
  • #60
What passwords? There is no evidence Dylan used any of networking sites since Sunday, as far as I can tell.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
150
Guests online
1,324
Total visitors
1,474

Forum statistics

Threads
632,404
Messages
18,626,012
Members
243,139
Latest member
LAHLAH11
Back
Top