D
Deleted member 39678
Guest
often the extended family shows a presence of support or even acts as spokesperson.
So if they don't, what does that mean?
often the extended family shows a presence of support or even acts as spokesperson.
Originally Posted by Seajay View Post
"She accused him and cursed him out in the text exchange when he text her and asked her if she had heard from Dylan on that Monday. It started then."
Sorry I don't know how to do the double quote thing. I am still curious about this. Can anyone direct me to this info or where to look?
often the extended family shows a presence of support or even acts as spokesperson.
The statement and link are upthread. Somewhere around page 24 or 25, I believe. I think it was posted by mija.
ETA: I found it, it was by The Cheese
Teresa Martinez, a friend of Mark Redwine, said Cory and Elaine Redwine have sent ugly and threatening messages to Mark Redwine, asking him, Where is Dylan, you piece of (explicative).
http://www.durangoherald.com/article...ly-for-Dylan--
What exactly does he do for work? And is it still with United Pipelines? Because that company would not have long distance truck drivers and haulers based on what their website indicates that they do. They maintain and rehabilitate pipes with their own brand of pipe liner. I would assume this is contract work in certain areas where existing pipes need maintenance. Has he been working on a large contract job in New Mexico for the past few years? How does that equate to driving trucks for 3 weeks straight at a time? And why is MR's job and living situation when he's not in Colorado such a big secret? Wasn't he the one who accused ER of trying to keep her job a secret?
:waitasec:
MOO
I don't know what ER did or did not text, but I am pretty sure my first response to a text from ex asking if I knew where my child was, when he was supposed to be safely with ex, would include a few WTF's.
Would it have been odd if he said, "I didn't kill Dylan" when asked if he had anything to do with his disappearance?
No. He's not. He's consistently stated eleventy billion times already that he doesn't know what happened to Dylan. That is no more a unique position than Elaine saying she doesn't know what happened to Dylan. That others think he is in a unique position despite facts, evidence, or objective reasoning doesn't make it so.
He's hired a PI, gives individual interviews, and cooperates fully with LE. That is more than enough for an objective individual to infer genuineness in his claims, as well as deduce that he isn't falling prey to the diversion his mob of critics insist on continually perpetuating.
I don't know what ER did or did not text, but I am pretty sure my first response to a text from ex asking if I knew where my child was, when he was supposed to be safely with ex, would include a few WTF's.
Well then you would be justifiably ignored from that moment on !
Right?
There is no link or msm for it . It was an assumption based on MR saying ' all hell broke loose'' when he texted ER to tell them their son was missing. SO it's now assumed and taken as fact that means she was swearing at him and accusing him !
I don't know what ER did or did not text, but I am pretty sure my first response to a text from ex asking if I knew where my child was, when he was supposed to be safely with ex, would include a few WTF's.
yes. if you claim you don't have knowledge of something or didn't so something, stating something specific and definitive in the negative is an indication that's exactly what happened.
Originally Posted by SCHMAE
MR is in the very unique position
of knowing much more about Dylan's fate than any of us and ER as well
BBM - I put Schmae's post so that everything is out there. MR is in a unique position, only MR and DR know what happened Sunday and Monday. ER wasn't there, so she has no knowledge. DR isn't with us so he's not talking. MR is the only one that KNOWS the answers to many questions.
ER was hundreds of miles away, she was not the last person KNOWN to see her son, so she does NOT know as much as MR and she is in a unique position. She is in a less unique position than MR, he knows how time was spent, ER doesn't IMO that makes it unique.
MR has not hired a PI, he accepted the pro bono services of a PI and IMO the credibility of a PI that post info on fb and challenges people on fb, is probably not the best of resources. All IMO, but I personally would not hire nor accept the services of someone that handles an important case, MY MISSING SON, as a fb challenge.
As far as genuineness in his claims, that IMO is up to each individual to accept or decline. I am a rational person and I do not see anything genuine in MR's comments. Before anyone says that I am the bitter ex or the jaded ex, or my opinion is tainted. Please let me mention, I have been divorced from MR for a number of years. There are few things in my life that I consider the best things in life. My children, they are the best thing, my grandchildren are the best thing. Filing for divorce and getting away from MR was a best thing.
I have had many years to "get over" the divorce, I'm well over it. I personally could give a rats arse what MR does or doesn't do in his life, that's not and has never been my concern. MY concern comes in where this impacts ME and MY family. NOTHING I have thought or said about MR has been about bitterness, jaded, whatever, it has been about life......like it or leave it, accept or not, it's the life we lived. It hasn't left us and it has reared it's ugly head in ways that can't be imagined. The thought that my comments are tainted by my marriage / divorce vs the experience in the marriage / divorce are absurd.
I can tell you from first hand experience NOTHING about MR that I have seen so far is genuine.
you are being facetious. please!
If they would need to get approval from ER, then they would need to get approval from MR as well. I guess I'm confused as to why it is thought that ER released those documents and/or approved for them to be used. If "parties involved" need to approve, then it would have been both ER & MR.
My point is, court records, unless sealed by the court for a variety of safety reasons, are public records. All that needs to be done is to contact the courts, ask for the records, pay the fee and it's done. Same with police records, public record. Police records are the report portion, not the entire investigation.
No, that is not true. I have provided the link upthread on this page twice now in the past few minutes. Here it is again.
Teresa Martinez, a friend of Mark Redwine, said Cory and Elaine Redwine have sent “ugly” and “threatening” messages to Mark Redwine, asking him, “Where is Dylan, you piece of (explicative).”
http://www.durangoherald.com/article...ly-for-Dylan--
To the mods: I'm not spamming. It seems everyone keeps asking about this over and over again and I'm answering their requests.