CO- Dylan Redwine, 13, Vallecito, 19 November 2012 - #34

[Psychic Sleuth]

Again, Dr. Phil is a talk show host. Yes he's national. Why is he not willing to get Dylan's story out there with just ER and CR? Why does he have to have MR there? If his true intentions are to help find Dylan, then do the interview with Cory and Elaine. The only reason he wants MR there is for drama, and in MNSHO it will put the focus of Dylan's disappearance on a family issue, so the sadistic pervert can continue to torture and abuse. MOO

Do you have a link to the Dr Phil show saying they won't do the show without MR?

 

[Dee10]

I don't have the statistic for this, but maybe someone does, aren't most missing people found by the public, not by LE?

 

[cluciano63]

Dr. Phil could simply show Dylan's photo every day for a week, but apparently he wants to make a show out of the case. If so, I could see him wanting the person Dylan was last with to be there. ER only knows what has been told to her about Dylan's last known hours.

LE might watch such a show with interest, if MR and ER took part, since it is pretty clear to me that they (LE) are stumped as far as this case goes. Just like I am sure LE watched Scott Peterson when he did that TV interview.

 

[SmoothOperator]

What is the big deal with waiting 3 weeks? He claims he had nothing to do with Dylan's disappearance. If that is true, then Dylan was most likely abducted. So this child could be tortured and abused right now by some sadistic pervert. So, yes, what's the bid deal with waiting 3 weeks?

Bingo! its been this issue all along that has caused concern to continue to grow.. no urgency whatsoever where Mark Redwine and his son who has been "abducted" are concerned.jmo.

 

[SCHMAE]

Three recent cases: Elizabeth Smart, Shawn Hornbeck, Jaycee Dugard. All three were kidnapped, all three were eventually allowed out in public, all three were recovered alive. So if MR had nothing to do with it, and Dylan was kidnapped, Dylan could in fact still be alive and abused. And Dylan could be allowed out in public. In which case publicity is the thing that would help to recover him.

Jenny , make no mistake. I'm not at all excusing MR's wanting to wait 3 weeks. I'm just guessing at what his OWN thinking may be as to why no urgency.

 

[BeginnersLuck]

I have no idea where Dylan is at seems like a normal statement to me. Why would you then add I have no involvement with where Dylan is at?

It almost sounds like he's saying he knows where Dylan is at but has no involvement with him getting there.

I know it's not just me noticing these repeated odd statements by MR.

Because he is being accused. He is saying he doesn't know where Dylan is and he is further clarifying that he had no involvement with his disappearance.

 

[Deleted member 39678]

I have no idea where Dylan is at seems like a normal statement to me. Why would you then add I have no involvement with where Dylan is at?

It almost sounds like he's saying he knows where Dylan is at but has no involvement with him getting there.

I know it's not just me noticing these repeated odd statements by MR.

BBM
If that's what Mark's saying, it makes little sense to me. MOO.

 

[Psychic Sleuth]

MR stated early on that he thought Dylan was probably abducted and taken out of the area. Why was he doing nothing to get Dylan's face out there or searching for his son? Maybe he just figured...oh well, what the heck, he's gone now, nothing I can do but let the investigation take it's natural course.

 

[TxLady2]

Well what if she pays him?

Sorry, I don't get what you're saying.

Why would she have to pay him child support if he only has Dylan occasionally and she has primary custody, meaning Dylan lives with her most of the time?

 

[Psychic Sleuth]

MR has recently stated that they arrived home btwn 8-8:30pm approx*. He also further clarified that upon arriving home they tossed the nerf football around, they watched "Adventureland" DVD together, and around 10:30pm MR goes to bed w/Dylan on the couch on his cell phone which MR assumes he was texting.

Did MR ever say specifically that they threw the nerf football around after arriving home?

 

[rebeccaeee]

<snipped for space> When was her first public interview? When was the first time she spoke in public??? To my knowledge, when she was on GMA on ABC, this was her first public interview. Was there one before this where she DIDN'T accuse Mark of having done something to Dylan???

Because if that's the case, even if her first public interview wasn't until 8 days after Dylan's disappearance, then it doesn't change that her first public appearance about it she "started accusing him right from the get go." KWIM?

Dylan's story was on GMA prior to the 26th. No public accusations then.

ETA: Aired on the 26th. My bad! She did, however, talk to several local stations in the days prior without making accusations. KRDO on the 25th, for one.

 

[Deleted member 39678]

I think that I'm going to hold off on commenting about my feelings on the Dr Phil subject until I see some information in MSM about what has happened and what will happen. Everyone should at least stick with the facts when talking about this subject. MOO.

 

[TxLady2]

Okay, I do not know why I assumed the show would also air on Tuesday. But I do not believe it takes two days of taping because it is filmed in front of a studio audience, and it doesn't seem too convenient to make everyone come back the next day. Plus, on their website, they say that they film two shows a day Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday.

Does anyone know when Baby Lisa's parents filmed their Dr. Phil episode? It aired on February 3. That might give us some idea.

However, I find it very hard to believe that the show is perfectly fine with not having a definite answer two days before it films. So I think they know whether they are doing it or not, just haven't announced it on the FB page.

I didn't mean every show requires two days of taping, but I read somewhere that this one would, so maybe that was on FB. My bad.

 

[Deleted member 39678]

MR stated early on that he thought Dylan was probably abducted and taken out of the area. Why was he doing nothing to get Dylan's face out there or searching for his son? Maybe he just figured...oh well, what the heck, he's gone now, nothing I can do but let the investigation take it's natural course.

Are you talking about getting Dylan's face in the media vs handing out flyers? Do you mean physically going out and searching for him?

 

[tlcya]

ON the Dr. Phil show and why he may not want to do the episode without MR's involvement:

Given that E has suspicions and many people in the public have voiced their own suspicions that MR is not being truthful about circumstances of Dylan's disappearance, Dr. Phil may not want to have a one sided show wherein MR will most likely not come off looking good as those appearing do not have much nice to say about him.

He may want MR there to give the appearance of a more balanced show/viewpoint and not to appear as if he is falling on E's side of the issue without giving MR equal opportunity to present his own side.

And quite frankly, Dr. Phil's show is not going to solve this case. It is an entertainment show and it is much more entertaining if E and M go at it on camera if you get my drift.

Just some thoughts.

 

[The Cheese]

Do you have a link to the Dr Phil show saying they won't do the show without MR?

This is the only MSM article I can find about the Dr Phil show -

“Dr. Phil is offering to put us on this Wednesday,” she said, referring to daytime talk show host Dr. Phil McGraw.

“I would love for (Mark Redwine) to join us,” she said. “It’s very important that we get this information about Dylan out there. As I’ve said all along, this is only about finding Dylan, and we need to work together as a team to do this.”



Read more: http://www.gazette.com/articles/monument-150724-birthday-dylan.html#ixzz2KXaC5ay2

 

[SCHMAE]

Dylan's story was on GMA prior to the 26th. No public accusations then.

ETA: Aired on the 26th. My bad! She did, however, talk to several local stations in the days prior without making accusations. KRDO on the 25th, for one.

Thanks ! So that is what I 've been trying to figure out . ER did not come out immediately accusing him. She started that language after trying to reach him and him ignoring her for several days. Is that correct?
If that is true then why did he ignore her all that time BEFORE she made an accusation against him?
There have been tons of posts saying 'well i wouldnt call her either after she accused me ' but if she
truly did not accuse him until AFTER his silence, then what excuses his silence for close to a week or so
with their baby child missing?

 

[Deleted member 39678]

Thanks ! So that is what I 've been trying to figure out . ER did not come out immediately accusing him. She started that language after trying to reach him and him ignoring her for several days. Is that correct?
If that is true then why did he ignore her all that time BEFORE she made an accusation against him?
There have been tons of posts saying 'well i wouldnt call her either after she accused me ' but if she
truly did not accuse him until AFTER his silence, then what excuses his silence for close to a week or so
with their baby child missing?

So Elaine's public accusations were not based on any initial feelings she had about Mark's possible involvement but rather because of a lack of communication between the two of them?

 

[The Cheese]

Interesting comment on FMDR about K-9 Forensics time frames from member of K-9 Forensics -

https://www.facebook.com/FindMissin...omment_id=118134842&offset=0&total_comments=1

Here is K-9 Forensics facebook too. Don't know if it's been posted.

https://www.facebook.com/pages/K-9-Forensics/249798878409404?fref=ts

 

[Tonto]

MR is in the very unique position
of knowing much more about Dylan's fate than any of us and ER as well.

No. He's not. He's consistently stated eleventy billion times already that he doesn't know what happened to Dylan. That is no more a unique position than Elaine saying she doesn't know what happened to Dylan. That others think he is in a unique position despite facts, evidence, or objective reasoning doesn't make it so.

He's hired a PI, gives individual interviews, and cooperates fully with LE. That is more than enough for an objective individual to infer genuineness in his claims, as well as deduce that he isn't falling prey to the diversion his mob of critics insist on continually perpetuating.