ColdHands
Member
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2012
- Messages
- 876
- Reaction score
- 2
Actually, it makes alot of sense. Early on here when many of us were grasping at what might have set someone off to hurt a 13 year old boy, I had to remind myself NOT to get inside the brain of someone like that. My rules do not apply to them. Anyone who could kill a young man does not function with the same reason and logic that I have so there might BE no understanding of it. We cycled through spousal revenge (still an option) to MR's drinking (perhaps an inducement to behave inappropriately) and now speculating that Dylan might have said something to set MR off (as ER has said from early on as well). There is NO acceptable explanation or understanding of such behavior. I have backed away from speculation about motive. It doesn't help me solve this particular case and it isn't helping me find Dylan. I agree completely with what AZGrandma has said here, we are hunting for the "why"- just chiming in that I can go on without the why sometimes because any answer to that question is unacceptable to my brain.
I agree. I stated this weekend that I'm sitting right at 50/50, and the 50% that thinks that MR is guilty of something is being led by the fact that people that know him think he is capable of doing something. And the other 50% is led by the fact that there is no physical evidence of that, nor is there physical evidence that anyone else did it either (not that I am aware of), leaving room for something to have been done to Dylan by someone else. IMO.