CO- Dylan Redwine, 13, Vallecito, 19 November 2012 - #6

[jjenny]

Here is the article about clothing for dogs, that says police had nothing available until some were delivered. So if some items of clothing were left behind, why couldn't police use those? Were they washed clothing, not the one Dylan was wearing while flying to his father's?

"None of Dylan’s belongings that could carry his scent was available in the first days of the investigation. But the family had articles of the boy’s clothing delivered on the weekend."
http://durangoherald.com/article/20121126/NEWS01/121129702&template=mobileart

 

[IHAVENOCLUE]

Do you have a link? Tia!

the other thread may be for accumulating MSM reports only... Without discussion...

Many of the longer threads set up a separate thread just for MSM article/reports for organized chronological MSM info...

Just a thought..

 

[nursebeeme]

I know that....this one is one that looks like it was started about the same time #1 thread was started and i did not think it was the media and link thread but I will look again...Thanks!

It is the info and support no discussion thread

 

[SuziQ]

I wanted to fact check myself and went looking for the article where ER makes the comment about MR providing Dylan's clothing. This is what was said. Evidently ER was under the impression that MR had no clothing to provide, not that he wouldn't provide them as I previously stated.

However, did MR say he had no clothing when he in fact did?

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/new...lorado-teen-dylan-redwine-planned-for-tuesday

(snip)
Elaine Redwine also questions why the boy's father, Mark Redwine, had no clothing to offer search teams and K-9 units.

 

[nursebeeme]

Here is the article about clothing for dogs, that says police had nothing available until some were delivered. So if some items of clothing were left behind, why couldn't police use those? Were they washed clothing, not the one Dylan was wearing while flying to his father's?

"None of Dylan’s belongings that could carry his scent was available in the first days of the investigation. But the family had articles of the boy’s clothing delivered on the weekend."
http://durangoherald.com/article/20121126/NEWS01/121129702&template=mobileart

Sarx answered this in the last thread.will have to find it for you.

 

[Tessie]

The last article posted says rsos are still being investigated

and says only 2 local, But in the county? 3 pages...

http://www.denverpost.com/coloradoregisteredsexoffenders?appSession=66923558391684

 

[Camdenres]

That is the info and support thread.

Thanks Nurse....Yes it is! I just did not see it before...Sorry Carry on!

 

[oceanblueeyes]

To me the latest info of the blanket on the couch, the clothes left behind, the cereal bowl etc really doesn't mean much. Other than Dad did presumably pick him up from the airport. Fingerprints might show if Dylan really touched that bowl or not but do they really have Dylan's fingerprints on record?

Blanket on the couch means nothing. TV on Nickolodeon means nothing. Dirty bowl on the sink means nothing. Clothes left behind only means that Dad did pick him up at the airport IF those are clothes he brought from Mom's house and not clothes he had left behind in Sept perhaps?

These are all things that could easily be staged by Dad.

Oh I think everything means something. Maybe not on an indiviual basis but they do collectively. I dont think LE can be fooled if they were staged which I have no reason to believe that they were.

I am sure items were taken in and he also said they went to Walmart and MickyDs when they got in...that too can easily be verified. We know that Sgt. Bender has already confirmed his alibi for the morning he said he was out running errands.

So I havent seen LE contradict what Mr. Redwine has said happened and the events he laid out. He sure knows they are listening to every interview he has. I dont think he is a stupid man.

imo

 

[oceanblueeyes]

and says only 2 local, But in the county? 3 pages...

http://www.denverpost.com/coloradoregisteredsexoffenders?appSession=66923558391684

Wow thats a lot of creeps for such a small area.

imo

 

[jjenny]

How do we know that Dad didn't tell LE this all along and we are just now finding out? LE does not release all the info they have to the public.

Since LE wouldn't say they were able to verify Dylan made it to his father's house, then presumably whatever info they have doesn't prove that he made it to the house.

 

[Psychic Sleuth]

I don't think it's unreasonable to think Dylan got bored and wandered off to fish or to a friends or even to try to get a ride into town. I also don't think it's unreasonable that he wanted to spend some time with his friends while he was in town.

I don't believe that if Dad did something he did it out of spite toward the mother, or kidnapped him or anything like that. It's possible Dylan got mouthy with him over not being able to go to the friends that night and Dad got mad and things got out of control. 13 year olds can be quite mouthy and it seems he already wasn't too thrilled about having to go to Dad's. I would like to know what Dad did for punishments with Dylan. Was he a spanker? A belter? A timeout-er?

 

[TGIRecovered]

I appreciate the efforts of everyone who has researched cell coverage in the area. Thank you to those posters!

However:

I am convinced by the fact that local police and sheriffs departments are using the absence of any cell activity after a certain point to indicate foul play, that Dylan did have enough coverage to get a text or call out if he had tried. They are apparently pretty sure that Dylan could have made contact if he had been able to try.

MOO

 

[callyn]

Meaning overnight? Why was he visiting his dad if he wasn't going to see him at all??

Dylan was going to be with dad for a week. According to dad, the plans were not set in stone. I'm sure Dylan missed his friends. I remember at that age my family moved and I missed my friends with a pain in my gut. Being with them for one overnight would have been heaven for me and I feel that it would have been for Dylan also. So to me, one overnight out of a week is not like he wouldn't have seen dad at all. jmo

 

[jjenny]

Sarx answered this in the last thread.will have to find it for you.

The information about items of clothing left is a new information that only just came out.

 

[JustJeannie]

Here is the article about clothing for dogs, that says police had nothing available until some were delivered. So if some items of clothing were left behind, why couldn't police use those? Were they washed clothing, not the one Dylan was wearing while flying to his father's?

"None of Dylan’s belongings that could carry his scent was available in the first days of the investigation. But the family had articles of the boy’s clothing delivered on the weekend."
http://durangoherald.com/article/20121126/NEWS01/121129702&template=mobileart

BBM

It's possible they were clean. If one of my kids had clean clothes in his backpack, was going to leave for a friend's and take his backpack, I could totally see him dumping out the clean clothes to make the backpack lighter to carry.

I'm sad to admit that at 13, any of my 3 boys would probably think that clothing worn the day before on a flight were still clean enough to wear another day. At that age, those kind of things weren't important to them.

At this point, I am not sure what I believe about MR... but I do think that IF Dylan left the house on his own, it is possible he was wearing the clothes he traveled in the day before, and anything he left behind could be clean and not have his scent on it.

 

[SailorMoon]

Our 17 year old grandson and 18 year old granddaughter still watch cartoons on Nickelodeon.

Heck I know some grownups that watch it. :floorlaugh: One of our daughters is 40 and she watches them sometime. lol

I don't have satellite anymore but even I was a faithful ICarly watcher!!

Not much time, but see some new news has come out, I guess, (busy working 2nd job this weekend) and about to head in. Nothing substantial though, correct??

 

[Linda7NJ]

I'm still stuck on the whole hitchhiking thing. I can't even imagine who in their right mind would pick up a boy!




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[oceanblueeyes]

I wanted to fact check myself and went looking for the article where ER makes the comment about MR providing Dylan's clothing. This is what was said. Evidently ER was under the impression that MR had no clothing to provide, not that he wouldn't provide them as I previously stated.

However, did MR say he had no clothing when he in fact did?

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/new...lorado-teen-dylan-redwine-planned-for-tuesday

(snip)
Elaine Redwine also questions why the boy's father, Mark Redwine, had no clothing to offer search teams and K-9 units.

And he simply said those comments arent correct.

But this has always nagged at me for so long.

Seven New Mexico State Police scuba divers used three different boats with four different sonar systems to sweep the southern end of Vallecito Lake Monday. That's where cadaver dogs from the La Plata County Search and Rescue Team alerted on a scent both Saturday and Sunday.

Our neighbor who had terminal cancer jumped into a huge lake a couple of years ago. Witnesses on the other side saw her go in and not come up. They extensively searched the area and the dogs alerted to her scent but they never found her and after searching for 2 months they finally gave up.

imo

 

[jjenny]

BBM

It's possible they were clean. If one of my kids had clean clothes in his backpack, was going to leave for a friend's and take his backpack, I could totally see him dumping out the clean clothes to make the backpack lighter to carry.

I'm sad to admit that at 13, any of my 3 boys would probably think that clothing worn the day before on a flight were still clean enough to wear another day. At that age, those kind of things weren't important to them.

At this point, I am not sure what I believe about MR... but I do think that IF Dylan left the house on his own, it is possible he was wearing the clothes he traveled in the day before, and anything he left behind could be clean and not have his scent on it.

Clean clothing without Dylan's scent don't exactly prove Dylan made it to the house, do they? The bowl of cereal and spoon, if analyzed, would probably have some DNA, but presumably could have been washed at some point of time before forensic search.

 

[Eileen730]

Here is the article about clothing for dogs, that says police had nothing available until some were delivered. So if some items of clothing were left behind, why couldn't police use those? Were they washed clothing, not the one Dylan was wearing while flying to his father's?

"None of Dylan’s belongings that could carry his scent was available in the first days of the investigation. But the family had articles of the boy’s clothing delivered on the weekend."
http://durangoherald.com/article/20121126/NEWS01/121129702&template=mobileart

Maybe because the clothing left was not worn..
My kids wont leave to go anywhere without a shower and fresh clothes.
If Dylan was in that house LE knows.