Sure it is. In one scenario, where Gannon "goes to a friend's house" sometime after 3:15, and she says she has no idea which friend it is, he could have been abducted or gotten into the car of someone he knew. Too bad she has no clue at all which friend it was or which house.
But in the last scenario she gives, there's now a POI (according to her) that LE knows about (LE denies it) that she says Gannon met up with or walked with. Apparently, neither parent had enough of an idea about what friend is involved or which person may have met up with Gannon that afternoon (when AS is notified that Gannon is missing, around 6:30 pm, he apparently does not immediately get on his phone and call that house of the friend, and he doesn't call police himself to give them that friend's name or else LE would have gone to that house, more than once). Neither parent knew where he was.
Perhaps she's just trying to cover up neglect, entirely possible (some people can't handle being perceived as negligent, they may even become frantic in an attempt to avoid criticism of any kind). I'm sure Albert's later conversations with LE have helped them sort some of that out.
From my point of view, the area of the search focus speaks volumes as to whether LS is involved. We shall see. LS is certainly not saying or doing all she can to find Gannon, if she actually knows about this other person and didn't say so immediately (and until the video came out, she did not mention that she had taken a sick child out for a 4 hour tour of Colorado Springs and environs).
