What we see is that TS is reactive and explosive. No doubt she thinks this statement exonerates her but IMO it only incriminates her worse. We're supposed to believe that an injured Gannon (this is the first confirmation we've gotten that he was in fact injured) left his home with NOTHING, through a side gate, presumably away from all cameras. Please note, according to her narrative, he left with NOTHING. Think about what all SHE loaded up to go "shopping." So injured Gannon, according to her, returned now from shopping, must have exited the truck on the far side without his feet ever touching down, went inside and changed into jeans, found a key and let himself out a side gate, to meet a "friend" who drove him away in a mystery car???? I thought he was a runaway. Now he's an abducted runaway?
When your story doesn't add up, I guess you just change your story to fit what you think LE knows.
No worries, LE knows a whole lot more.
JMO JMO JMO