CO - Gannon Stauch, 11, found deceased, Colorado Springs, El Paso County, 27 Jan 2020 *Arrest* #64

[iamshadow21]

So won’t Dr Lewis’s testimony be more accurate now, than if she didn’t meet LS in person before. Isn’t an accurate diagnoses what we want?

The problem is that Dr Lewis is widely considered to be someone who has a theory and sees evidence to confirm it in just about every violent criminal she assesses, disregarding what doesn't match her theory. Her methods are considered questionable.

MOO

 

[Jw192]

So won’t Dr Lewis’s testimony be more accurate now, than if she didn’t meet LS in person before. Isn’t an accurate diagnoses what we want?

You are totally right, it's an accurate diagnosis that we want, but to visit a defendant without the courts knowledge the night before you are going to be on the stand in a highly serious, expensive and controversial trial of the brutal murder of a little boy... Especially after not submitting your reports until after the judge gives you a kick up the bum, and not even video record the meeting?It's all just not professional practice imo

Also, lie bag is like a malingering sponge. She has sat through trial listening to people point out her obvious errors in portraying DID and sponging up on how to act in front of this doctor, so no, I don't believe that last nights little visit will help in anyway to an accurate diagnosis :/

 

[Curious Me]

Can you get my chargers? (to her cell phones) Sadie needs to go out. Can you get my chargers? Albert says no-- I need the truth.

She couldn't take the dogs out. She was ashamed. Oh... now the story is somebody raped and kidnapped Gannon, and Albert has to let LE know the new story.

What are Jurors thinking listening to this? Sly, but stupid, snake of a woman is what I'm thinking.

..
​

 

[10ofRods]

The problem is that Dr Lewis is widely considered to be someone who has a theory and sees evidence to confirm it in just about every violent criminal she assesses, disregarding what doesn't match her theory. Her methods are considered questionable.

MOO

She hasn't published a single juried article (academic article) in the past 10 years, that I can find. That alone is suspicious.

In the meantime, there's been an amazing amount of research about DID (including research about its use as part of a NGRI defense). But she does not use those techniques (which also include using neuroimaging).

This 1985 article is the most cited. Total sample for that study was 33 boys (24 of them already incarcerated).

Conclusions are not strong, even in that article. There's nothing about DID in it that I can see. And it relies mostly on other people's clinical data about the 9 boys that her team is attempting to study.

IMO.

 

[Marie Bell]

Not if the State has no access to the data on which she is basing that diagnosis.

But yes, she may NOW have what she needed when she wrote her darned report - it's supposed to be the other way around. The data on which she based her report WAS record and made available to the State.

This is now Secret Information. Strictly forbidden in US discovery rules, and outside of CO's rules as I understand them.

She cannot claim her diagnosis is more accurate now, though - the Judge has said they can't use last night's interview at all. But Dr Lewis may well now have details (not disclosed at any other time) that she can say are inferences in her professional opinion. I find this shady.

IMO. Unfortunately, I have to miss the beginning of her testimony. But breaking the rules is not a good look, IMO...

What the judge suggested to Mr Young was that Mr Young could very well, in cross examination, ask Dr Lewis why it was that she felt that she needed to meet with the defendant *after* she had already submitted her report. Defence counsel had blustered about how Dr Lewis just wanted to re-familiarise herself; so the obvious question is 'why couldn't you just re-read your report, like other witnesses do?'

 

[Amster]

So won’t Dr Lewis’s testimony be more accurate now, than if she didn’t meet LS in person before. Isn’t an accurate diagnoses what we want?

What??? More accurate? lol

 

[iamshadow21]

She hasn't published a single juried article (academic article) in the past 10 years, that I can find. That alone is suspicious.

In the meantime, there's been an amazing amount of research about DID (including research about its use as part of a NGRI defense). But she does not use those techniques (which also include using neuroimaging).

This 1985 article is the most cited. Total sample for that study was 33 boys (24 of them already incarcerated).

Conclusions are not strong, even in that article. There's nothing about DID in it that I can see. And it relies mostly on other people's clinical data about the 9 boys that her team is attempting to study.

IMO.

We have come so far since then in the fields of dissociation and trauma. Just to name a few, Judith Herman, Jennifer Freyd, Janina Fisher, Suzette Boon, Martha Stout (who we mentioned yesterday), Onno van der Hart, Bessel van der Kolk... I know two of those folks are persona non grata now, or at least tarnished in reputation, but their work is still important. All of it after the eighties. (I suspect some of them, Herman in particular may have been working and publishing in the field in the eighties, but they have all published significant works AFTER that decade.)

MOO

 

[Ravenmoon]

She hasn't published a single juried article (academic article) in the past 10 years, that I can find. That alone is suspicious.

In the meantime, there's been an amazing amount of research about DID (including research about its use as part of a NGRI defense). But she does not use those techniques (which also include using neuroimaging).

This 1985 article is the most cited. Total sample for that study was 33 boys (24 of them already incarcerated).

Conclusions are not strong, even in that article. There's nothing about DID in it that I can see. And it relies mostly on other people's clinical data about the 9 boys that her team is attempting to study.

IMO.

Interesting, especially since the DSM is revised or updated every 5 to 7 years.


JMO

 

[Megnut]

Died.
Diet.

Freudian?

 

[Soulmagent]

Died.
Diet.

Freudian?

Its the only way I would diet ,but Maybe a WS poll is in order..

 

[Cindizzi]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1653142517838401536

 

[iamshadow21]

Afternoon break until 3:25.

 

[Curious Me]

Witness going over the shortness of breath, Letecia having to go to the hospital. Harley & friend picking her up at a Taco Bell.

Harley talking to Albert about moving out taking Chance and Sadie and needing their supplies. Harley asks if she and her Grandma can move stuff out of the house. Harley wants to pick up her Mom's stuff too, and Harley wants all her Memories Boxes. Mr. Stauch thinks he's talking to Harley.
​

.... Afternoon Recess Break now.

 

[Megnut]

Hahahaha Burn!

Judge reduces the breaktime to where the hands hit the clock (reference Cook being late to the party earlier). Defense, burn.

 

[puppyraiser]

If that is Dr Lewis in the courtroom, I wonder if she's having second thoughts after hearing all the testimony today.

 

[Soulmagent]

Hahahaha Burn!

Judge reduces the breaktime to where the hands hit the clock (reference Cook being late to the party earlier). Defense, burn.

No screen shot of that yet ? The memes will be lite.

 

[Marie Bell]

If that is Dr Lewis in the courtroom, I wonder if she's having second thoughts after hearing all the testimony today.

Well I hope she's liking Colorado because I don't think they're going to get started with her today. Another overnight stay for her, I reckon.

 

[Kiranerys]

What the judge suggested to Mr Young was that Mr Young could very well, in cross examination, ask Dr Lewis why it was that she felt that she needed to meet with the defendant *after* she had already submitted her report. Defence counsel had blustered about how Dr Lewis just wanted to re-familiarise herself; so the obvious question is 'why couldn't you just re-read your report, like other witnesses do?'

Especially since that report was only actually finalised and submitted just over a month ago!

Afternoon break until 3:25.

" That's the small hand on the three, big hand on the five "

 

[Marie Bell]

DP

 

[Kiranerys]

Well I hope she's liking Colorado because I don't think they're going to get started with her today. Another overnight stay for her, I reckon.

She is going home on Wednesday so I hope she talks fast!