- Joined
- Jul 7, 2018
- Messages
- 36,961
- Reaction score
- 243,425


'Mommy Wants You Home': Mother of Missing Colo. Boy's Gannon Stauch Asks Public to Help Find Him
Gannon Stauch, 11, vanished from his home on Jan. 27
Last edited:
I'm sure enemas can be and are used improperly. Many things can be. But I also suspect there are thousands of parents who give enemas to their children and they don't have any sort of "fetish."I'd be interested to know if , in NZ, a stepmother would be allowed to administer such a thing to a stepchild. ( love the avatar, btw, ) It seems a terrifically invasive and risky procedure on a child, by an amateur. What was the father thinking in going along with this?.. or the kids doctor? . or his mother? or, . anyone , anyone ?? Where there protocols set up where she was supervised at this procedure?.. of all the elements of this murder, this aspect is so ghastly, that poor poor kid, it defies belief, ..
Why Letetia would 'volunteer' to do it, to a child not her own, even her own , is a whole other story, found in the DSM-IV , under fetish and sadistic behaviours, I reckon.
Tealgrove said:I think we have a very intelligent and thoughtful Jury. I am confident they will do the right thing. By Friday evening it should be all over. Tee will be gone forever and thank goodness for that.
I can't lie, I will be FUMING if they find her NGRI.
Sure, forensic units in mental health hospitals aren't in anyway a holiday camp. You are confined with some very very sick and poorly people and watched like a hawk. You will also have a very strict pharmaceutical course and IF found to have the illnesses that lie bag is claiming, they would pump her full of allsorts which would make her round face even rounder.
I would be so disappointed and angry though as she is outright lying, and not only would there be a chance that she could possibly be released in the future, which is a scary af thought, also the big one for me is that she would have in a sense won y'know?
She is a heartless liar and needs to rot in a prison for what she did to that innocent boy.
I agree completely. I got the impression that the good doctor was desperate to find the perfect DID before she truly retired. I felt she really wanted LS to be the real thing. Someone that would once and for all fulfill the life long hunt she's been on. Much like an addict seeks the bliss of their first high, she's addicted to the desire for the multiple that will substantiate all her theories and validate her work. I believe she was sorely disappointed that LS was just another faker.In both the HBO documentary featuring Dr. Lewis and publications citing her critics, each opined they were uncomfortable with Lewis's interview technique where they believed she encourages the subject's alleged alter -- similar to what we see in court objections "leading the witness."
I can understand this criticism. IMO, I believe the subjects experience Dr. Lewis as sympathetic and easy to talk to because she does not appear to react to the most horrific details. Unphased, she just moves on to the next question. It's actually kind of creepy that she also retells details and seems disconnected from the words coming from her mouth. MOO
I believe if she does change her mind that she will be allowed to do so. So far Judge W has done everything possible to make sure she has a fair trial and keep the judicial record free from appellate issues. Until the defense actually rests she still has the right to take the stand. IMO the possibility is great for a last minute effort to convince the jury she's what she says she is.Rbbm
But can she legally do that at this stage?
I would like to see judge sentence her immediately after verdict is read.Unfortunately she will not be gone - there will be a sentencing hearing for her.
Thank you!Yeah, she pulled a lot of the same stunts when she was testifying forty years ago. The documentary makes that clear. She's elderly, yes, but her performance on the stand was the same kind of junk she's been doing for decades. Not infirmity, manipulation and deliberate disrespect for the whole institution of a trial and the law. She's dangerous. I only hope this is the last trial she's able to exploit for gain. She makes money from tragedy, from murder, from the actions of very bad, very violent people, and not only that, her testimony could mean those people go free. There's nothing benign in that.
MOO
I think she could legally up until the Defense says that they rest their case, which they will be doing Friday morning.Rbbm
But can she legally do that at this stage?
I would like to see judge sentence her immediately after verdict is read.
You may be right. And she may have been rough. That wouldn't surprise me. And Al said LS hated dealing with GS's bowel issues so I do believe that part to be true. I'm just not convinced that home enemas for kids are as unusual as appears to be suggested in some posts nor do I think they are usually abusive.I think giving enemas to a child who needs them is typically a normal thing. But there have been several things throughout this case that make me think there were negative (to put it mildly) aspects to it with LS and Gannon.
- She talked WAY too much about his bowel habits from the very beginning. I think she hated dealing with it and most likely took it out on him every time she had to give an enema, and every time his bowel condition impacted her life in any way.
- One of her made-up stories involved someone (Edguardo, I think) raping him anally. That has always really bothered me.
- She brought up enemas to Dr. Lewis. This is something I don’t think we (or probably anyone) outside the family knew about. Why would she even bring that up? That aspect of “caring” for Gannon was a big deal to her, IMO.
Learning that LS brought that up in her interview, and hearing Dr. Lewis’s comments about it, have given me a new fear for Gannon — that LS may have been abusing him in this way, too. It would not surprise me AT ALL if she was rough physically and cruel mentally every time she did this. It would also not surprise me if while hating having to do it, she got some pleasure in his discomfort and the power she held over him at these times.
This is obviously all just my opinion!
Where is the Outrage?Her interest began in kindergarten, when a precocious desire to understand how a human being could be so cruel led her to try to figure out Adolf Hitler. After all, she was horrified when she watched her uncle slaughter a chicken on their farm in New Jersey. In Lewis ’ memoir, Guilty by Reason of Insanity: A Psychiatrist Explores the Minds of Killers, she recalls stories of the Nazi dictator hanging over her childhood as “a source of fascination and fear.” She was the only student in her elementary school “who did not rejoice upon hearing of Hitler’s suicide. Now I could never know what made him tick. … I was convinced, even as a child, that Hitler could not have been born that way. Something had to have happened to him. No one could be born that way. I still believe that.”
Lookup Detail View![]()
A fascination with violence
Dorothy Lewis has spent her career trying to understand murderers. Her ideas, once considered outrageous, now influence Supreme Court decisions.medicine.yale.edu
Name
Name DOROTHY O LEWIS MD
License Information
License Information
License Type License Number Expiration Date Granted Date License Name License Status Licensure Actions or Pending Charges Physician/Surgeon 12319 07/31/2020 09/21/1965 DOROTHY OTNOW LEWIS INACTIVE LAPSED DUE TO NON-RENEWAL None
When in the heck did she become Jewish?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.