Exhibit 666. My goodness!
Something I read earlier brought up this question, and haven't seen discussed...though I am certainly not saying it wasn't.
What WAS his plan after all of this? He planned everything for so long, down to the last detail. He clearly planned on living.
He didn't have clothes packed in his car - yet conceivably, his apartment was blown to smithereens!
He clearly planned on getting away...but to where? He didn't have that much cash on him - $280 in wallet.
Does anyone know? Did he just want to prolong the inevitable...and by wearing body armor etc. wanted to stay alive long enough to kill as many as possible...knowing he would be caught and go to jail at some point, no matter what?
OK, after reading the Motion to Suppress that Shelly posted...and fully accepting I don't understand legal jargon very well.
But it says that it was an illegal search of his apartment, his car and wallet. That it was without a warrant.
I thought I understood at some point since this started that no warrant was necessary to enter either of those places because the "threat to the public" overrode the need to wait for a warrant.
Is anyone willing or able to explain why or why not this is correct?
This is a good question and thanks for asking these type of thought provoking questions.
This is my understanding from learning about another case. This is how I have always thought it works.
For like a vehicle if you get pulled over, then if LE sees or smells something illegal with their own eyes or you act real suspicous like they see you make a quick move to hide something, then they can search your vehicle without your permission and without a warrant because they have a valid reason to suspect something illegal themselves.
For this case, if LE determines ANYONE life is at risk they can just enter premises or vehicles without a warrant. To either save someone from harm or to take action to prevent harm to others.
So like in this case they knew he threw smoke bombs and had weapons so they could validly want to check his car or apartment for any bombs or even other people that he may have planned the attack with. Or they could even claim they are checking to make sure he didnt have any victims in the car or his house. All valid reasons.
In some cases if there was not an immediate threat then LE will sometimes get a warrant first even if they know they dont necessarily need one. They like to be sure it holds up in court so they do prefer to get warrant when there is no rush.
I think any searches they did in this case were all justified even without a warrant.