Maisiebelle
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2014
- Messages
- 4,031
- Reaction score
- 22
This witness is doing so well. She looks so young.
This witness is doing so well. She looks so young.
Will C. Holden ‏@will_c_holden · 2m2 minutes ago
We've got the #theatershooting notebook. We will be publishing shortly here: http://kdvr.com/tag/theater-trial-exhibits …
It is evidence and evidence is displayed in its entirety, unedited.I don' now..why do they have to play the video? 22 hours? Good Grief.
They are saying it will take about 5 days.
![]()
Wow... Pretty strange
minutes ago
Dr. Reed was a psychiatrist who interviewed JH after his arrest? I wouldn't "trust" it to be authentic, he could be play acting. I wonder if there's any recordings of JH or notes written by his psychiatrist BEFORE arrest.
#TheaterShooting: Defense attorney Dan King wants the videotaped interviews between the gunman and Dr. Reed to be played in their entirety.
2 minutes ago
Prosecution argues that the 22 hours of interviews are not continuous - they are segments taped over several days. Prosecution says it would like to break up the video according to the court's schedule.
DA George Brauchler: "Your Honor, this is our case."
anica.padilla
larry ryckman ‏@larryryckman
she decided not to run to the lobby because she was worried that #theatershooting gunman had gone there. Instead she fled thru bottom exit.
That's when she saw a man standing next to a white car. Standing by driver's side. Couldn't see any guns,
she looked for somewhere else to go. "i didn't think it was safe to run past him." she was scared.
She thought there was a gunman in the lobby and now the guy in the parking lot was "weirding me out."
It is evidence and evidence is displayed in its entirety, unedited.
Just wondering why they wouldn't just question the Dr. about his interviews with JH. It just seems more practical to question..then cross..and question again if necessary rather than watch 22 hours of video first.
I still don't understand WHY the court/judicial system hasn't adopted the ability for juror's to declare "GUILTY BUT INSANE" which would place them into a mental hospital facility and IF deemed sane..then goes to prison to serve out the rest of his sentence. The way it is now..Not Guilty by reason of insanity means those who are malingering and gets away with it can miraculously become sane and be set free back into society.
The actually truly Insane, like say Andrea Yates..She will never get out from that mental Facility for the rest of her life..but someone like JH could easily act normal when it suits him and obviously has fooled a boatload of people throughout his life Since he says he's always been fascinated in Mass Killing since a young child..So He's could easily manipulate the system and get back out pretty quick if Insanity defence works here...
Sorry for ramble, but have been muddling this over in my head for many years :facepalm:
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.