Maisiebelle
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2014
- Messages
- 4,031
- Reaction score
- 22
Jury given 10 minutes to review the notebook printouts before they are taken away from them.
They objected to the witness reading it for the prosecution, however, apparently the defense is allowed to read it to the witness. I’ve heard this referred to as the “defense testifying”. Strange, no objections. -RIGHT???? He objected against it...and is now doing it himself!!!!!!!
RIGHT???? He objected against it...and is now doing it himself!!!!!!!
RIGHT???? He objected against it...and is now doing it himself!!!!!!!
They objected to the witness reading it for the prosecution, however, apparently the defense is allowed to read it to the witness. I’ve heard this referred to as the “defense testifying”. Strange, no objections. -
They objected to the witness reading it for the prosecution, however, apparently the defense is allowed to read it to the witness. I’ve heard this referred to as the “defense testifying”. Strange, no objections. -
The defence are trying to confuse the jurors by reading parts that seem muddled or not making much sense.
Everything I got from the notebook was he is a PSYCHOPATH...but not insane.
His "research mental illness" really blows anything else out of the water.
I wonder if there will be a forensic analysis of this. Different pens used, showing written at different times, etc.
Hey you guys!!! Just got home... I'm gonna try and catch up but wanted to say hello!!!