Wow! I was JUST talking to my husband about this being my one nagging "confusion" since hearing the original call information. I know people here seem to be confident that the father somehow "fit into" that morning's routine and ended up driving his son despite the original plan. But why do police keep saying over and over that Jessica had planned on meeting "a regular group of friends" in a very specific park(three block distance)? As far as I have heard- the police have completely dropped that detail (about meeting boy first) from the description of where Jessica was right before she dissapeared. I also wondered why how the father would know to drive his son- maybe the little boy was told by his father that he was only allowed to walk if Jessica was with him, and the little boy went home after realizing she hadn't shown up- but wouldn't be the type of chaos that a ten year-old would remember? (at least by the same afternoon)? Just sharing my thoughts...I must be missing some info, I'm glad I'm not aloneThanks a lot. Is this verified fact of the way things happened, or your impression? I ask because the Mom specifically said that Jessica called to ask her friend if he was WALKING (which doesn't translate to me that his dad was DRIVING him to the park). If Dad was driving, then I'd have thought he would have told Jessica he could pick her up with his son at the park and drive her on to school. I haven't read anything that said the Dad was driving his son to the park to meet Jessica, so can you please tell me where you found this? Thank you.
