I wonder if the Rs are the ones who put up the reward money.I agree IMO just a silent straw ! Until the final outcome is known. Then again LE may suggested the interview to shake more monkeys out of the trees.
Ok just saw a comment from Kelsey Souto the reporter from KMVT on her official Facebook page giving a tiny bit more info about Rs belief regarding KK alleged mindset. Ms. Souto says they’ll have more on that this week.
I would guess KB's parents did.I wonder if the Rs are the ones who put up the reward money.
Can you explain why you’re making a distinction between solicitation and a threat? BFF told them that her friend had been solicited; solicitation by its nature involves a threat. If you are aware of a solicitation, then you are aware that there is a threat to someone’s life. If you disagree that’s perfectly fine; I’m just not following your reasoning about the distinction and the importance of it.I'll agree to disagree with you that this was a threat. I believe they were aware of the crime of solicitation not a threat. IMO
I know they weren't violating their ethics as attorneys, that's why I didn't say they were. I said they failed to act as decent human beings.
Again all MOO anyone is free to believe differently.
I would guess KB's parents did.
Actually, because of all the current research on DV abusersThanks mrstfs. Is it this comment?
"Kelsey Souto - KMVT News according to the Rockstahl’s they believe KK was in fear for her life. We’ll have more on that later this week."
They've just blown the "PF & KK were lovers" slant. Now it sounds like KK is someone you might call if you need a killer.
KK is in fear of her life, knows PF wants KB dead, yet she doesn't contact LE at any point? And KB phone pings in Idaho?
Can you explain why you’re making a distinction between solicitation and a threat? BFF told them that her friend had been solicited; solicitation by its nature involves a threat. If you are aware of a solicitation, then you are aware that there is a threat to someone’s life. If you disagree that’s perfectly fine; I’m just not following your reasoning about the distinction and the importance of it.
That’s the problem, people in fear for their lives don’t travel hundreds of miles, and at the very least, participate in a coverup.Actually, because of all the current research on DV abusers
and murderers, this is a great defense. Many times others
have been threatened by the perps and people tiptoe around them.
That doesn't explain KK driving 700 mi. on Tgiving and assisting in doing whatever.
This is going to be a convuluted story I can tell.
Thanks mrstfs. Is it this comment?
"Kelsey Souto - KMVT News according to the Rockstahl’s they believe KK was in fear for her life. We’ll have more on that later this week."
They've just blown the "PF & KK were lovers" slant. Now it sounds like KK is someone you might call if you need a killer.
KK is in fear of her life, knows PF wants KB dead, yet she doesn't contact LE at any point? And KB phone pings in Idaho?
She was divorced - perhaps it was not her "turn" with the kids. I will be interested to see what the R's say regarding this alleged trip IMO.I don't understand why she went to CO on Thanksgiving if she has two kids... She wanted to be with PF more than she wanted to be with her kids? Something doesn't add up here. What if he has something on her and was using it to make her do all of that stuff? Just saying...
Totally agree with you, I'm just thinking of her performanceThat’s the problem, people in fear for their lives don’t travel hundreds of miles, and at the very least, participate in a coverup.
They didn’t live together, and she was not in any immediate danger anyways.
All she had to do was contact law enforcement, and she could have prevented this.
Being in fear doesn’t justify participation in the murder of an innocent mom.
One thing I’m not sure anyone has mentioned regarding this couple - maybe the only way BFF would open up to them was if they promised to keep the information confidential. If that was the agreement, that would explain why they couldn’t say anything until after they heard about the disappearance, because at that point there is the likelihood that a felony was committed and they could be breaking the law by not reporting what they know. Right?
I don't understand why she went to CO on Thanksgiving if she has two kids... She wanted to be with PF more than she wanted to be with her kids? Something doesn't add up here. What if he has something on her and was using it to make her do all of that stuff? Just saying...
I mean, sure, that makes sense. But still, why not spend Thanksgiving with her family and stay around just in case she can see the kids? I don't know, Thanksgiving is not a thing in my country but it seems like a pretty big thing in the US - family visiting, college kids going back home - that's why I'm confused.She was divorced - perhaps it was not her "turn" with the kids. I will be interested to see what the R's say regarding this alleged trip IMO.
I don't know... That happens though. I guess I can't really think right because we don't know anything for sure about their relationship... Were they friends? How long have they known each other? If we knew those things it would be easier.Or she just felt inclined to help out a dude she was hot for. Even if to do so would be a crime. That happens frequently.
A scenario where an innocent person is blackmailed to do something criminal because the blackmailer "has something on her" mostly occurs in the movies.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.