I don't think that anyone is saying KKL is lying about what she saw.
The problem is that PF removed the body and several other items in the tote and took it to a large, mostly wild area devoid of cellular tracking; that included Nash ranch on the 22nd. On the 24th, KKL drove MG's car to meet PF, who was driving the old small Toyota truck and followed him to Nash ranch. She watched him climb across the haystacks and lift the tote onto the tractor hay forks, lift it into his truck and followed him back to his home. He asked her to take the tote back to Idaho with her, and she refused. Then he placed it in the trough, doused it and started the fire. At the end, she noticed a lump still present in the trough, and assumed it was the remains. Nowhere in that description did she actually see a body, or anything else identifiable except a lump.
The questions are:
1. Can a 220 lb man lift a 110 lb tote with ease while standing on top of a haystack?
2. Is there any place between the condo and Nash ranch that might be a better hiding place for a body than on top of a haystack in someone else's barn?
3. Can a human body be incinerated while encased in plastic in 3-4 hrs using only a few gallons of gasoline, some motor oil and a little wood?
4. Is there a river or dump convenient to PF's home that the remnants of whatever he burned could be disposed of, and if so, where would the remnants be now?
5. If a tote that recently contained a dead body was placed on top of a haystack, while still containing a number of other bloody items that had been packed with said body, would a cadaver dog that was placed on a hay rake and suspended over said haystack get a hit on a dead body? Once done, if the cadaver dog was then lowered to the ground and walked around the haystack that he had gotten the hit; would the dog hit again, possibly where said tote had been set before placing it on the hay rake to raise it up a month earlier?
I don't have any answers to these questions, but I don't think KKL lied, either.
IMO