I agree with much but not with all which is to be expected right

? Let's start with Mensa type of jurors, that is the last thing they want imo and I will not elaborate on that nor sidetrack on it because it would be futile. I will say a juror who is a member of Mensa will be able to literally read and interpret fully the jury instructions. They would be better off with women who think PF's bangs are ugly and that KK was not treated right by him and that certainly does not take qualifying as a member of Mensa.
The other main thing I disagree with is she tied together pings, phone calls, etc. from when solicitations and planning first began. When and where did I miss that LE had this info? I am not saying come trial they may not have such things but anything I have seen is from the 21st late hours/22nd early hours on. They have pings, etc.. from back when? Seriously.
I agree with much of what you said

and I hope they do have such things but I guess I am not in on the loop on that one because I have seen no such thing.
Other than these things, I pretty much agree but nothing is a slam dunk and she is a liability imo. Lord knows what she will get up to in the years until trial commences, particularly free to travel and do anything she wishes, no restrictions to speak of at all. I am sure the defense is salivating over that thought and possibility.
He is guilty, no doubt. She is as well. KB is dead because of the two of them. imvho.
I understand and respect your response and I myself think what I stated herein.
I will celebrate, however, if and when he is put away and moves from county to prison. That we agree on