- Joined
- May 9, 2016
- Messages
- 7,349
- Reaction score
- 53,632
That is fair but what about all the friends they have that thought they were a great couple? All staged, too?
Again, I think behind closed doors things could have been different.
That is fair but what about all the friends they have that thought they were a great couple? All staged, too?
Yep, you are correctI think it would have taken a Herculean effort for him to show emotion there. The stakes couldn’t have been higher, and he still couldn’t do it.
He’s just not like most of us. Of course, that goes without saying.
I don't believe SW ever thought CW was inferior. I think she praises him because she was dependent upon him during times she didn't feel well and she wanted him to know how much she appreciated him and needed him.
JMO
If only CW had those same views. Or any views as his children as human beings. Not trash to be taken and dumped in huge, dark, oily metal tanks in the middle of nowhere while his/her family/friends searched frantically for them. IMOExactly. Years of training to look at children as real live people with their needs , boundaries.
CeCe was inside for the whole video, SW acknowledged that she did not like to be squirted and let her stay inside, the door was opened once to squirt her and I am not sure she even got wet. I don’t see the lack of cues or ignoring her wishes. Bella would move in for more whenever SW turned her attention to squirting the glass door.It has nothing to do with the squirting. It is her not respecting her children’s wishes. Such as the little one not wanting it. And there is a look . But if people don’t see it, then they don’t.
It doesn’t matter if she ws trying to give them $1000 a piece chocolates. The one child did not want it.
Not caring about cues or recognizing them.
I would think she was a pretty typical housewife or even working woman with children. Lots of women even today let their men take the lead in making major family decisions. Society likes to pretend we're all about equality but the reality is that's lip service. It's nice to say but when you look at the facts of most marriages, the patriarchy is alive and thriving.If the roles were reversed what would you think of him or her?
Wasn't it SW's idea to move to CO?
AFAIK the COD has not been released to the public.Do we definitely know what the cause of death is for Cece, Bella, and SW? I know CW states that SW strangled the children and he strangled SW. Have we accepted that story? Is there any other verification that is definitely the cause of death?
Agree, we don’t know what goes on behind closed doors but friends described them as always touching, hugging, hands always all over each other. That body language does not describe a troubled marriage. Per friend’s it was in the last few months when this body language changed.Again, I think behind closed doors things could have been different.
Nope, waiting on the autopsy results to be released.Do we definitely know what the cause of death is for Cece, Bella, and SW? I know CW states that SW strangled the children and he strangled SW. Have we accepted that story? Is there any other verification that is definitely the cause of death?
I agree. IMO it was “the perfect storm” when they met. They filled each others needs at the time but that quickly faded. IMO it turned into some resentment or disappointment for both of them.Some of them might not have been to promote thrive. Either way, I didn't get that warm fuzzy feeling. JMO
Do we definitely know what the cause of death is for Cece, Bella, and SW? I know CW states that SW strangled the children and he strangled SW. Have we accepted that story? Is there any other verification that is definitely the cause of death?
I agree.I agree. IMO it was “the perfect storm” when they met. They filled each others needs at the time but that quickly faded. IMO it turned into some resentment or disappointment for both of them.
Omg, their little pink noses...so precious. Such a loss of life.
The thread is open again. Please note the following:
Do NOT take other members' posts personally. I do not even begin to understand how so many posters think someone is talking about them personally, but it has derailed this thread. If someone disagrees with your point of view, but does so in a respectful way, it is not about you and it is not bullying.
Please continue to alert on posts that violate TOS. I'm sure I missed a number of posts while attempting to address the numerous alerts on this thread.
Stop discussing parenting styles and choices. If it continues, this thread will be shut down for a lot longer than one hour.
Finally, while we are allowing discussion of CW's story because it seems to be what he is going to present as his criminal defense, it is wise to remember that Shan'ann's family and friends may be reading here as well and Websleuths is a victim-friendly forum. Some of you may have heard the term "re-victimization" used by law enforcement or attorneys. When a victim's character, lifestyle, or choices of any kind are impugned, that is a form of re-victimization. Shan'ann and her children are not here to tell their story or to defend themselves.
Before you post anything, particularly if it is critical or judgmental of a victim, ask yourself if you would be comfortable making that statement to Shan'ann's family in person or to Bella and CeCe's grandparents (on either side of the family). Would you say to their face something that you are comfortable posting here anonymously? Because some of the family and friends of both Shan'ann and Chris are likely reading this thread and all of them (both sides of the family) have suffered unspeakable tragedy.