Of course. That's what any sane parent would do. Just one more crazy part of the story one would have to accept, along with every other improbable, fantastical leap in logic that one would have to take in order to find his nonsensical story remotely plausible.
There's just too much one would have to pretend didn't occur or have to pretend doesn't matter that it didn't occur, or have to pretend isn't reality (like pregnant women never being family annihilators but routinely being victims of them), in order to get there.
At a certain point I truly think it comes down to motivation to want to believe she killed her kids due to intense dislike for her.
No doubt in my mind that twisted whispering in internet land has helped foment that dislike.
Yet all I can think of now is how beautifully it's going to backfire.
Trial won't be for years. That's years the state has to refute the ugly and ridiculous rumors some who support CW out there have spread. Years for the state to line up every teacher, colleague, co-worker, fellow parent, doctor, neighbor, friend, family member, child care provider, etc., to attest to the reality of who she was and what she did, all juxtaposed with evidence of the depths of depravity of the sinister liar CW is. The mountains of texts messages and internet searches and witness evidence of months of deception that I think it's a safe bet to make, exist in this case - as they do in most every other.