- Joined
- Mar 4, 2018
- Messages
- 29,558
- Reaction score
- 695,162
We’re never going to be satisfied with the motive, as whatever it turns out to be, it won’t fully explain his actions. It can obviously never justify them.But - I don't know how you interpret the DA's word "partial" used in this context. Maybe, "we don't know what else pushed him to do it".
But maybe (and this is how I view it) "for 99.9% of people this reason would not be enough to kill a pregnant wife and two little girls".
So we still shall be left wondering, after the 19th, why, or how the heck that reason was the rationale to squeeze the life out of own daughters whom he raised...
And the truth is, it is some craziness that may defy any psychiatric diagnosis. Simply, if in these circumstances, a person makes a choice that most people would not even think of, it is craziness, only of some special sort. Not in the sense of mental illness, but in the sense of extreme deviation off the norm.
The DA will reveal what he thinks the motive to be, but he will be unlikely to satisfy anyone.
This DA strikes me as the type of guy who will give us all the answers he can, in regards to the questions we want to know.
Sometimes the evidence doesn’t lend itself to the complete picture though, which I think will be the case here.