Found Deceased CO - Shanann Watts (34), Celeste"Cece" (3) and Bella (4), Frederick, 13 Aug 2018 *CW GUILTY* #56

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #821
I'm absolutely horrified and disgusted. From the way RW described Shanann as controlling, narcissistic and possibly bipolar to the descriptions of the girls' bodies being recovered to NK's... entire existence. Rourke was extremely controlled in what he said about her.

The 🤬🤬🤬🤬, the ring pawning, the web searches for wedding dresses. And book deals? Do people hate Amber Frey? I don't think I'm allowed to say anything I'm thinking because of TOS. Suffice to say, I hope that the entire sordid thing is displayed across the media in Radar articles for the public to judge, just like poor Shanann was judged. No, I'm not at all feeling charitable towards her victimhood right now so I'll just leave it at that.

I don't have words. No words. Nothing is adequate. It just keeps getting more and more indescribably awful page by page. And I'm clearly not even to the worst parts yet. My heart is just shattered for the Rzuceks.
I wonder if Cindy Watts would approve of NK?
 
  • #822
I don’t know. I think the DA screwed up with NK. I know everyone thinks Rourke is amazing, but this doesn’t impress me much.

I think he was simply more concerned with catching the big fish.

She lied, but it doesn’t really change much in regards to what happened.

Her statements, her search history, and some of the shots taken by investigators (creepy laugh, extent of her 🤬🤬🤬🤬 searches), are a bit of payback, even if it wasn’t intentional.
 
  • #823
I think he was simply more concerned with catching the big fish.

She lied, but it doesn’t really change much in regards to what happened.

Her statements, her search history, and some of the shots taken by investigators (creepy voice, extent of her 🤬🤬🤬🤬 searches), are a bit of payback, even if it wasn’t intentional.
Her life will never be the same, that’s for sure.
 
  • #824
@PommyMommy I love your list of questions. Is it worth asking where the girls’ blankets were found?
 
  • #825
And after all this, CW will still get fan mail. it should not be allowed

I agree. We all should take bets on how long it will take him to put up a dating profile.
 
  • #826
I think he was simply more concerned with catching the big fish.

She lied, but it doesn’t really change much in regards to what happened.

Her statements, her search history, and some of the shots taken by investigators (creepy laugh, extent of her 🤬🤬🤬🤬 searches), are a bit of payback, even if it wasn’t intentional.

Agreed. Reading this my opinion of her has absolutely changed and certainly not in a good way, she comes off looking very bad to say the least, just like a co-worker suggested in the early threads. But she had no part in anyway in the murders or trying to cover them up, so I think Rourke took the right approach.
 
  • #827
@PommyMommy I love your list of questions. Is it worth asking where the girls’ blankets were found?
Many of those questions were answered in the 2000 page discovery document published today.

As for the blankets, CW mentioned in the “confession” that they were near the sheet left at the dumpsite. He said that they may have blown away.

Repeated searches failed to recover the missing blankets, or stuffed animals (that were also missing).
 
  • #828
This is my first post after quietly reading since September. The infamous doll photo was taken on CW's phone and sent to SW.

Look what CW's dad had to say about it to investigators, not knowing his son took the picture.
 

Attachments

  • FB_IMG_1542873509482.jpg
    FB_IMG_1542873509482.jpg
    92.1 KB · Views: 308
  • #829
  • #830
I think you can still be a feminist though. Just because she may have known about his wife's pregnancy doesn't make her any different to any of the thousands of men and women who have affairs every day.

When I was expecting my first child, I had a neighbour who had just come home from hospital to discover that her husband had been having an affair for the duration of her pregnancy. Within hours of bringing the baby home, he told her he was leaving her for the mistress. She was beyond devastated. My friends and I gave her all the support we could, but 18 months later, she did exactly the same thing to another woman. I would have thought, knowing what a painful experience it was to be treated like that, it would be the last thing you'd do to another woman. I just don't get how women can be so unbelievably brutal to one another.
 
  • #831
Yoooooo.

The date.
ka-boom!!!

great catch ronso

tell enough white lies and you have a snowball rolling down the hill.....

moo
 
  • #832
Edited to say that our member Ronso has the discovery page posted. In the documents, it says NK Googled "Shanann Watts on September 1, 2017. Here is the link to Ronso's post Found Deceased - CO - Shanann Watts (34), Celeste"Cece" (3) and Bella (4), Frederick, 13 Aug 2018 *CW GUILTY* #56

As was pointed out NK had nothing to do with the murders but this tidbit of information does bother me.

Do you think this could be a typo? That maybe she did the Google search Sept 1, 2018? That would make more sense. If not then NK lied about a lot of things.
 
Last edited:
  • #833
I think he was simply more concerned with catching the big fish.

She lied, but it doesn’t really change much in regards to what happened.

Her statements, her search history, and some of the shots taken by investigators (creepy laugh, extent of her 🤬🤬🤬🤬 searches), are a bit of payback, even if it wasn’t intentional.
The big fish would have been paramount in their mind and
no doubt when the defense approached the prosecution with a plea it would have been the equivalent of manna from heaven. Rourke and his team would have honed in and focused on nailing CW. MOO
 
  • #834
I'm absolutely horrified and disgusted. From the way RW described Shanann as controlling, narcissistic and possibly bipolar to the descriptions of the girls' bodies being recovered to NK's... entire existence. Rourke was extremely controlled in what he said about her.

The 🤬🤬🤬🤬, the ring pawning, the web searches for wedding dresses. And book deals? Do people hate Amber Frey? I don't think I'm allowed to say anything I'm thinking because of TOS. Suffice to say, I hope that the entire sordid thing is displayed across the media in Radar articles for the public to judge, just like poor Shanann was judged. No, I'm not at all feeling charitable towards her victimhood right now so I'll just leave it at that.

I don't have words. No words. Nothing is adequate. It just keeps getting more and more indescribably awful page by page. And I'm clearly not even to the worst parts yet. My heart is just shattered for the Rzuceks.
Oh. Wow..
 
  • #835
It sounds like they were very happy until she left to NC. Lots of touching, lovemaking etc. And yet the minute she left, he made moves on another woman. I 100% think this means he had regular affairs, or casual sex, and likely that was all that NK was supposed to be. But then he fell in lust with her and he wanted her more than who he already had.

No wonder Shanann was so confused. And no wonder we are all confused too! There is nothing rational about this at all. He's simply a defective human.
 
  • #836
Yeah, when NK came forward I actually used the words "she's just like Amber Frey."

After reading this document, I realize she is nothing like Amber Frey.


Oh .Yes. I thought she was like Amber Frey as well. And . Wow. I look at the timing of her statement to media a little differently now.
 
  • #837
I wonder if Cindy Watts would approve of NK?
I don't think she would approve of anyone taking "her" place. Creepy relationship.

Moo
 
  • #838
NK search history.
She searched Chris Watts in 2017 also.
 

Attachments

  • 1542874844469.jpg
    1542874844469.jpg
    72.4 KB · Views: 304
  • #839
Edited to say that our member Ronso has the discovery page posted. In the documents, it says NK Googled "Shanann Watts on September 1, 2017. Here is the link to Ronso's post Found Deceased - CO - Shanann Watts (34), Celeste"Cece" (3) and Bella (4), Frederick, 13 Aug 2018 *CW GUILTY* #56

As was pointed out NK had nothing to do with the murders but this tidbit of information does bother me.

Do you think this could be a typo? That maybe she did the Google search Sept 1, 2018? That would make more sense. If not then NK lied about a lot of things.
I don’t think they got the year wrong. They retrieved NK’s phone records in the days after the murders.

Therefore, her data would only be visible/pertinent up until the middle of August.

They’d only have everything prior to that, to potentially include September 2017.
 
  • #840
IMO Trinkett78 "punked" us.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
132
Guests online
2,772
Total visitors
2,904

Forum statistics

Threads
632,679
Messages
18,630,368
Members
243,248
Latest member
nonameneeded777
Back
Top