Would it have been better to blame the judge’s ruling on expert testimony, rather than being close to finding Suzanne, in the request? I am worried about a future trial if they don’t find Suzanne.
That was also listed in the motion to dismiss --
"Second, when this case was filed it was mainly premised on the Defendant’s motive to
harm the victim, his sole access to the victim at the exact time she was last communicating with
anyone by phone, and his consistent dishonesty with law enforcement, which came to light given
the truck telematics, phone, and location data recovered. The Court functionally excluded the
People’s best evidence to move forward in this case by severely limiting our expert’s testimony.
Even if the Court were to partially reconsider its position on the need for such severe sanctions at
this late hour, the People would still be left without several key expert witnesses initially
endorsed."
https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/11th_Judicial_District/Freemont/Morphew/2022-04-19 08-49-34 Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice.pdf