Thanks LNF!Hope you get better soon.
Thanks LNF!Hope you get better soon.
I just don't know. It would be an understandable bluff on the one hand (getting case dismissed without prejudice), but unfair to Suzanne's family on the other. A huge piece for them is having closure in that regard.What do you believe about the DA’s statement saying they believe they know where the body is? Just asking for more time or actual belief that they know?
Spezze feels confident in Barry’s guilt, as we at Websleuths do.
I sure hope the news media don’t give up on this case. Spezze seems committed but of course, this is his jurisdiction. I just don’t want to see this become a cold case.I just don't know. It would be an understandable bluff on the one hand (getting case dismissed without prejudice), but unfair to Suzanne's family on the other. A huge piece for them is having closure in that regard.
So for me to believe they do know, it would mean that they obtained new information at some point. I say that, because they've had two summers now in which to search this area of interest.
So I guess I'm leaning against this being true, but the door is open. I guess we'll find out in the coming weeks and months.
YES. Let's keep this image in our minds!
It's reminding me of when the Moorers were let off the hook for the murder of Heather Elvis but then arrested and convicted of her kidnapping.
@Cindizzi sbm for focus Thx your post.
I just don't know. It would be an understandable bluff on the one hand (getting case dismissed without prejudice), but unfair to Suzanne's family on the other. A huge piece for them is having closure in that regard.
So for me to believe they do know, it would mean that they obtained new information at some point. I say that, because they've had two summers now in which to search this area of interest.
So I guess I'm leaning against this being true, but the door is open. I guess we'll find out in the coming weeks and months.
I just don't know. It would be an understandable bluff on the one hand (getting case dismissed without prejudice), but unfair to Suzanne's family on the other. A huge piece for them is having closure in that regard.
So for me to believe they do know, it would mean that they obtained new information at some point. I say that, because they've had two summers now in which to search this area of interest.
So I guess I'm leaning against this being true, but the door is open. I guess we'll find out in the coming weeks and months.
I just don't know. It would be an understandable bluff on the one hand (getting case dismissed without prejudice), but unfair to Suzanne's family on the other. A huge piece for them is having closure in that regard.
So for me to believe they do know, it would mean that they obtained new information at some point. I say that, because they've had two summers now in which to search this area of interest.
So I guess I'm leaning against this being true, but the door is open. I guess we'll find out in the coming weeks and months.
I have a suspicion that they got information from a former employee who talked with BM that night, and BM’s truck was outside her house, and I have another totally unproven theory (no MG is NOT guilty in my mind and I won’t divulge until later), she was in a lot of the same places BM was. She was interviewed four times, she ‘mostly cooperated’ she was offered ‘an envelope of money’ she was told it ‘could look like hush money’ (can’t remember exact wording. She was threatened by BM not to hand over her phone. She left town because she was scared of him, and I am sure she had very good reason to be. IMO while in no way involved with any criminal action she has a lot of specific information to share. MOO
@Cindizzi bbm sbm for focus You do not miss a thing.... reporter talking to a young woman outside the courthouse in the J. Depp trial. She had 2 very cute LIVE LLAMAS on a leash and said she brought them in hopes that JD might see them and they cheer him up. Lol @Kemug !
I have a suspicion that they got information from a former employee who talked with BM that night, and BM’s truck was outside her house, and I have another totally unproven theory (no MG is NOT guilty in my mind and I won’t divulge until later), she was in a lot of the same places BM was. She was interviewed four times, she ‘mostly cooperated’ she was offered ‘an envelope of money’ she was told it ‘could look like hush money’ (can’t remember exact wording. She was threatened by BM not to hand over her phone. She left town because she was scared of him, and I am sure she had very good reason to be. IMO while in no way involved with any criminal action she has a lot of specific information to share. MOO
While we are disappointed in the delay of the proceedings, we remain unwavering in our commitment to this investigation and the ultimate prosecution of Mr. Morphew
Excellent observation. We can only hope!Barry better hope that his relationship with SD stays strong. I mean, how many cases have come together because of a scorned lover out for revenge.
I mean, they should have been laser focused on Barry. He would have been easily cleared if Suzanne showed a sign of life after he left, had her phone not powered down before he left, and if his alibi was an actual alibi.rsbm. Doesn’t a statement like this from the Sheriff reinforce IE’s press conference statement that the sheriff’s office was laser focused on BM being the guilty party and not being willing to look at anyone else?
and I hope by rest you don’t mean to leave for a long time. I love reading the comments by those of you who are knowledgeable in the law.
rsbm. Doesn’t a statement like this from the Sheriff reinforce IE’s press conference statement that the sheriff’s office was laser focused on BM being the guilty party and not being willing to look at anyone else?
and I hope by rest you don’t mean to leave for a long time. I love reading the comments by those of you who are knowledgeable in the law.
Let's really call a spade a spade. Judge L gutted their expert testimony. He basically threw out their very good circumstantial case by leveling sanctions that make a mockery of justice. I'd like to know WHY? And where is the precedent for such a pro-defense move by a criminal court judge? He knew what he was doing.I may be way off base here but IF they had new info come in that was strong enough couldn't the prosecution have said that and received a continuance? I hate to say this but I think they don't have anything and just BS'd their way out of this to put some pressure on bM and save face. This was a catastrophic case for the prosecution and they blew it. I hope I'm wrong but it just doesn't make sense to me to pull the whole case off the table if they had ANYTHING remotely relevant. They may have a few more pieces of circumstantial evidence but as far as anything concrete? Nah, they have nothing. What a horrible day.