BM's Nephew & GD. Charges re 'Talk' w MG?
@notbornyesterday sbm for focus. Why has Dist Atty not yet filed charges against either man? Imo main factor:
Bigger fish to fry.
Other factors: What chg?*
Bribing,
Intimidating,
or
Tampering w a Witness? Did MG have "
knowledge of the existence or nonexistence of facts relating to any crime"*
Did any of the three participants
record the convo? Provide to LE? If not, easy to imagine MG's stmts to LE and TN's & GD's stmts contradict one another.
Were threats, payment, or promises made? Subtle or explicit? Exactly who said what and when? The more
recent stmts of all three to LE may
vary slightly or substantially w their own
earlier stmts to LE. Was $ withheld from MG for labor she had already provided? Or did they provide $ to her in excess of her legit labor? Perhaps at a later time? In sum, a clustercluck of a
swearing contest. Imo, not so cut & dried as some here think.
Is MG willing to appear, take the stand, & to
testify?
Does Dist Atty have
sufficient evd to prove TN and/or GD committed any one of those three types of offenses?
Considering the above, I understand why charges have not been made to date and also don't predict future charges.** my2ct.Could be wrong.
________________________
* PART 7 VICTIMS AND WITNESSES PROTECTION
"18-8-701. Short title. This part 7 shall be known and may be cited as the "Colorado Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1984".
18-8-702. Definitions. ...
(2) "Witness" means any natural person:... Having knowledge of the existence or nonexistence of facts relating to any crime..."
18-8-703. Bribing a witness ...
18-8-704. Intimidating a witness ...
18-8-707. Tampering with a witness ..."
** Statute of limitations, Class 4 felonies. Dist Atty has three yrs from date the offense allegedly occurs to press charges. Iirc this convo (maybe, the one and only convo?) happened w'in first week of SM's disappearance. So possibly another yr to file?