We all hope she is found this summer. It would be disappointing to find out is was a false tip or more false bravado by the DA.
Please define OP's meaning of:
"a false tip or more false bravado by the DA."
Given that including the reference to searching an area under 5 ft snowpack, made in good faith, was completely unnecessary for the court to grant the motion for dismissal without prejudice, this comment by OP makes no sense.
Unless the purpose is just to take a jab at the DA.
It's a fact that the DA has some well-defined issues of non-compliance on her record, that stand on their own, but I don't understand how making up factually irrelevant reasons, pursuant to dismissal, seemingly just to take jabs at the DA, will advance the case, or add anything positive to the discussion. JMO
ETA: I'm following a couple of cases where
"false tips" are a matter of life and death.
The search for a lost hiker in Wyoming (still missing) was impacted when a woman gave a false tip to investigators that she talked to the hiker on the date he was reported missing -- providing that he was headed to a specific location to jump off his favorite rock into the water, and the conversation never happened.
More recently, a missing boy's mother was given a false tip that her son dined in a tavern located in a different state, and the witness waited more than a week to recant after phone records did not place him in the area.
Facts matter.
www.nps.gov