There's truth in what you say. Both Byalirisen and Eytan committed themselves to pursue a vision of justice that views criminal defendants as oppressed victims, and established investigation and prosecution procedures as both abused and inherently unfair. They use every legal argument, and every strategy and tactic to deter abuse and make changes in the law.Good morning, even evening to all.
In contrast to #669 above, I'll attempt to make my points sans distractions. You may, but need not, wish me luck.
------------------------------------------- Barry is part and parcel of this civil matter in heading name only;
- It was, (remains?), no more than counsels' modus operandi of distracting, delaying, exhausting and bludgeoning the state and judiciary into submission;
- Replete with the potential for $ettlement$ from anyone and/or no-one-in-particular amongst a gaggle of besieged "defendants", akin to a "shakedown";
- That this was instigated by defense counsel notwithstanding, in the first place, their never intending to allow Barry's direct version of anything to be put on the (civil) record,
- Secondarily noting [nearly judicially so!] their client to be a pathological lying liar who lies, and consequently his own worst enemy, (albeit, from the firm's standpoint, a fatted calf,
- and the most professionally reckless tack would be to solicit let alone listen to anything Barry blurts.
That said, they cannot act independently of their client, to whom they owe obligations of candor, competence, diligence and loyalty. They can proceed only with his well-advised and informed consent, and he approves every pleading. This is, in the fullest sense, Barry Morphew's case. I believe he understands that it's a long shot, but as you say it does have the effect of postponing his criminal day of reckoning. And that, to him, is worth paying for even if the case is ultimately dismissed.
So the attorneys are using him to advance their agenda, and he is using them to advance his. MOO.