Respectfully - we don't really know what fee arrangement Morphew has with his attorneys. We do know that they are top trial attorneys who specialize in defending criminal charges then suing the public officials who arrested and charged their clients. In 2022 F&B won one of the biggest judgements at trial in Colorado - in a false arrest case.
In my somewhat informed opinion, these lawyers do not enter no-cost contingent fee arrangements with clients who have the ability to pay. In many states they are prohibited from advancing costs (e.g. filing fees, deposition costs) and must have client funds to do this. Attorneys don't take risky cases like this at their own expense. They typically require an advance payment sufficient to cover their office expenses (rent, staff salaries) for the period of time they expect the case to be litigated before it settles. Their fees, as such, are typically paid from a percentage of the settlement or judgement. But the advance payment in a garden variety civil rights/liberties case would be $50,000. Morphew's is no garden variety case, so I would guess he put at least $100,000 into it before the case was filed.
I speculate that Morphew made a very large advance payment to Eytan and Nielsen (maybe 80% of his net worth) for his criminal defense through trial, and that a portion of this remained when the criminal case was dismissed. I am guessing that this remainder was used to fund (at least partially) the advance for the civil case.
Barry's testimony will be required in the civil case to rebut the allegations in the arrest affidavit. If he did not testify these claims would be dismissed on summary judgement. And although he can lawfully invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions in a deposition or in trial, the jury will be instructed that they can draw the inference that his testimony is not credible and that his answers would have been adverse to his claim. There are other consequences if he refuses to supply evidence on discovery that is essential to a claim or defense.
So I don't think he will be advised to sit silent. Nor would he be inclined to do so - he already demonstrated that he thinks he can deceive people, or in the alternative that he lives in a delusional world. All MOO.
Good morning; even evening to all.
In contrast to #669 above, I'll attempt to make my points sans distractions. You may, but need not, wish me luck.
------------------------------------------
- Barry is part and parcel of this civil matter in heading name only;
- It was, (remains?), no more than counsels'
modus operandi of distracting, delaying, exhausting and bludgeoning the state and judiciary into submission;
- Replete with the potential for $ettlement$ from anyone and/or no-one-in-particular amongst a gaggle of besieged "defendants", akin to a "shakedown";
- That this was instigated by defense counsel notwithstanding, in the first place, their never intending to allow Barry's direct version of
anything to be put on the (civil) record,
- Secondarily noting
[nearly judicially so
!] their client to be a pathological lying liar who lies, and consequently his own worst enemy, (albeit, from the firm's standpoint, a fatted calf,
- and the most professionally reckless tack would be to solicit let alone listen to anything Barry blurts.
--------------------------------------------
Ergo,
overheard in defense chambers:
{or words to this effect...}
IE's most junior clerk typist:
"Mr. Morphew?
Counselor Eytan has asked if you would be so good as to retire to our anteroom?
Oh. And would you care for her to order a carry-out for your lunch? She recalled for me how much Agent Cahill appreciated her doing that for him when they got together for their chat years back...that was, inasmuch as they would be seeing each other in court the next day and all...Would you? And while I take care of that, would you care for some coffee?
Oh. Sorry. I forgot you're strenuously opposed to caffeine and such. Right living and all...
Sorry. My bad.
