Great first post.First time posting here but I've lurked since the Arias Trial. I don't often agree with some of the things posted here but I'll do my best to post clear thoughts and my logic to what I post.
Regarding the gun. I don't think it was the murder weapon.
First, BM is an avid hunter and gun guy. A sawed off-shotgun, and that is what I believe the gun is, makes an awful mess and LOUD noise. Not only would you have to contend with a lot of blood splatter but you would also have a lot of pellets to account for. A shotgun shell contains multiple projectiles. IF he was using say Double 00 buck shot that's at least 12-15 pellets a lot more if it was a smaller gauge. Furthermore, once fired from a short barrel the spread of the projectiles opens up a larger pattern in the air than a long barrel. Even at close range you could still find pellets that don't hit the target. That's taking a lot of chance that some pellets miss, go through or bounce off/ricochet into the the surrounding area of the crime scene. An experienced gun person would know this and look for a different option. One that is less messy, loud and leaves the less potential for evidence.
Furthermore, and I'm not a lawyer but wouldn't there be another charge on top of possessing an illegal firearm? A further charge of not only possessing an illegal firearm but also using that firearm to commit a crime or homicide would be tacked onto the charges. That's another felony on top of the one for just possessing it. If the DA was packing charges onto the AA I would think that that charge would be more serious and carry more weight. If they had the murder weapon, I think that would have been added to the charges. The way that the charge is worded leads me to believe that the firearm in question was found during a search hence just the possession charge.
Welcome to Websleuths, @Derph !
IF Barry was himself a true crime aficionado , he'd know the results of a gunshot in the home.
Add to that his friend who says Barry's an avid hunter.
My theory leans more towards drowning in their hot tub or strangling.
I also think it's important who was living there at the time and if they were in the beginning stages of separation ?
This will be revealed in the AA, possibly.
Was Suzanne expecting to be home alone during that time ?
Had Barry stayed at the home the night before or not ?
If not, then his claim to have seen her sleeping at 5am would be false .
Not enough for the charges being brought, but a piece of evidence that adds to the mountain that LE would have to charge with first degree murder and not manslaughter as in accidental.
As in Barry cannot say he pushed her in a rage and she fell on the floor and hit her head and died.
If so, why hide her remains ?
Imo.