One thing to keep in mind...every witness in the PH (5?) is LE...there are a number of key players who are not LE, and are going to testify at trial. That one dimensional aspect of the PH may be why some are feeling angst and seeing nothingburgers.
@Alethea. What do you think Judge Patrick Murphy's decision will be?I almost feel like the prosecution was just going through the detective handbook's "means, motive, opportunity" playbook. They definitely covered all three but as the prosecutor, you have to prove that the defendant actually did it. Not just that he could have.
I’m very confused. I hope the prosecution isn’t done. Is this all it takes to bind someone over for murder one and lock them up without bail are lies and assumptions? I believe he is guilty but I don’t see the prosecution having a good case.I almost feel like the prosecution was just going through the detective handbook's "means, motive, opportunity" playbook. They definitely covered all three but as the prosecutor, you have to prove that the defendant actually did it. Not just that he could have.
So what are these attempting to influence a public servant charges? Wouldn't evidence of that crime go to show evidence of a cover-up in the murder? Or was it about the voting?
Wow. So all they have is from him talking to the police. He keeps quiet, he skates. Astounding.
I’m very confused. I hope the prosecution isn’t done. Is this all it takes to bind someone over for murder one and lock them up without bail are lies and assumptions? I believe he is guilty but I don’t see the prosecution having a good case.I almost feel like the prosecution was just going through the detective handbook's "means, motive, opportunity" playbook. They definitely covered all three but as the prosecutor, you have to prove that the defendant actually did it. Not just that he could have.
Yes, the officer swears to the affidavit and the Judge signs it - link to Frazee AAI didn't mean the order, I meant the actual AA. I understood that the AA itself needed to be signed by a judge?
Agree! But Prosecution is finished presenting evidence in the Prelim it appears! I know BM should be bound over for MURDER 1, held without Bail, but I’ve been following this case as close as one can for 15 months, like white on rice. Average juror won’t have followed this at all! This prelim was disappointing imho, as far as evidence! MooI’m very confused. I hope the prosecution isn’t done. Is this all it takes to bind someone over for murder one and lock them up without bail are lies and assumptions? I believe he is guilty but I don’t see the prosecution having a good case.
I think it was about the voting. Earlier today it was said that BM wanted Trump to win and that he knew the Dems were cheating via voter fraud. It was not to cover up the (alleged) murder.So what are these attempting to influence a public servant charges? Wouldn't evidence of that crime go to show evidence of a cover-up in the murder? Or was it about the voting?
Remember how the judge complained about the length of the AA and said a lot of it was not evidentiary. Justice for Suzanne is in jeopardy here. This judge just ain't buying it.No. They have massive cell phone data, GPS records, and surveillance video. And much more. 129 pages worth.
So what are these attempting to influence a public servant charges? Wouldn't evidence of that crime go to show evidence of a cover-up in the murder? Or was it about the voting?