Jackielee09
Former Member
- Joined
- May 26, 2017
- Messages
- 648
- Reaction score
- 5,203
Exactly.BM offered the reward only if she’s returned alive. That’s why he can put 100k on the line. He knows he’ll never have to pay it. IMO
Exactly.BM offered the reward only if she’s returned alive. That’s why he can put 100k on the line. He knows he’ll never have to pay it. IMO
Thank you for this understanding. We only get one bite at the apple. Why jump the gun if we don't have to?
As I read the (contradictory) fine print in "Fire Restrictions in Chaffee County", a campfire would be permitted currently if it's in a pit no wider than 3ft in diameter.
The relevant line item seems to be this:
"7.4 Stage I Restrictions: Forbid building, maintaining or attending any Open Fire within Chaffee County. The following are exempt from Stage I fire restrictions and excluded from a Stage I ban:
• Campfires, warming fires and charcoal fires within a permanent constructed fire grate in a developed public campground or picnic ground or permanent constructed fire grate or fire ring in a commercial campground or on private property."
Later edit: But NO. The ordinance is for a Stage 2 ban beginning on May 8. Campfires seem only to be exempt during Stage 1.
The clauses of the ordinance are murky, however, so someone may need to correct me on this. Good luck!
There likely would be similar restrictions all over the state, but BM, volunteer firefighter, would know whether or not a specific area is affected. He likely was also familiar with fire restrictions related to construction.
I'd be interested in BMs whereabouts as well... did anyone see him Fri/Sat/Sun? Did he stop at his usual deli for breakfast? Show up for work? All important details we dont hear a peep about. Guarantee LE knows all of these answers.Complete different set of circumstances here.
When JD was initially reported missing, her vehicle was also missing.
SM's vehicle was back at the residence.
The bike was also located the evening she went missing
What possible use would releasing a vehicle or bike description be?
Had LE been able to verify an independent sighting of SM on Sunday or any time thereafter, they would have released that to the public, along w/ a description of her clothing, when and where she was last seen, etc.
The fact that LE has not released any of this information clearly indicates that they don't want someone to know how much progress they've made in determining the timeline of her movements leading up to her disappearance.
They're keeping the perp in the dark, which is a brilliant strategy.
The less that person knows, the more likely they are to trip themselves up in more and more lies.
JMO.
Exactly.
I'm *so glad* you commented! I know from following cases off and on over 25+ years, the reality of the job is so vastly different than what people think it is (including the infamous "CSI Effect").
I don't know why it's so hard for people to understand that LE is not going to share any info they don't have to, and most of it is not known until a trial occurs. Of course we all want to know all the details (I sure do), but it's part of the deal of following a case, and for a thorough investigation and fair trial for the defendant and the state, it's worth it.
My thoughts..... I think LE is on to him but I believe he's the type, that will go down with the ship....in other-words don't think he will crack that easy. The silence with LE is sure to bring out the voices in his head. I think that is one tactic LE is using to put pressure on him to bust...
Just my moopinion
Missing Mom: Suzanne Morphew Disappeared 4 Weeks Ago
CHAFFEE COUNTY, Colo. (CBS4) — It has now been four weeks since Suzanne Morphew was last seen. Morphew reportedly went for a bike ride near her home outside of Salida on Mother’s Day and never came home.
^^bbmThe vast majority of what you've mentioned here, I can almost guarantee none of us ever really give a second thought to, because we are law abiding citizens with nothing to hide from the police. (I confess, I had no idea the fobs contain data, now that does sort of creep me out). That said, that's exactly the problem for those who are normally a law abiding citizen, and then one day decide to I dunno, kill someone and hide the body. They also don't think about all these ways they've been tracked all along, but it's the FIRST thing investigators will start gathering to look over - all the electronic evidence.
Despite the fact I follow so many cases where digital evidence comes into play, I still find things all the time that are "tracking" me that I never knew about previously. One example is with google Chrome. Loads of people use it, and most know you can delete your search history. What some folks might not know, is that clearing your history is all well and good but you better take a look here https://myactivity.google.com too, after you've cleared your history. Then, you need too look at your synced phone's history too, because it doesn't always actually clear everything. This is just 1 tiny little thing, and there are 100 of them, if not more, tracking us all over the place, as you've mentioned. Quite literally from my front door to my car in the driveway, I am tracked by my phone, my fitbit, and my Ring cam that recorded me leaving the house. Once I get in the vehicle and turn it on, GPS is on as well. I haven't even left my driveway yet and I've been tracked by 4 separate devices - not to mention whatever home security cams folks next door and across the street might have. It's kind of mind boggling really, but here we are.
The above various locations alone could pose a significant issue for LE regarding cell phone and interstate cell towers analysis after the Supreme Court ruled that a search warrant is required to track an individual's cell phone location. The previous routine court order long relied upon by police that they were "seeking relevant information" from your phone carrier no longer works. The Supreme Court cited that an individual has a privacy interest in the day-to-day, hour-to-hour and even minute-to-minute records of his whereabouts — a privacy interest that requires the government to get a search warrant before gaining access to that information.
We don’t know when Suzanne was last seen alive.
We don’t know if she went on a bike ride.
Ita. ^^^My thoughts..... I think LE is on to him but I believe he's the type, that will go down with the ship....in other-words, I don't think he will crack that easy, not like others did. The silence with LE is sure to bring out the voices in his head. I think that is one tactic LE is using to put pressure on him to bust...
Just my moopinion
Those 400 calls must have something among them. Locals who ran into her. People who drove along Highway 50. Stores and shop owners who possibly interacted with her.
I mean the restrictions were just lifted (although not completely) What does “Safer at Home” look like for Salida?
So everything started to go back to ''normal'' a week and a half before she disappeard.
bbmBBM
I agree.
He can *have it all* if he can paint himself as a victim.
( Which he very well may be ...IDK )
All that stuff he served up in the impromptu interview is nonsensical.
BM ,so you’re offering a 210K reward for her return from a mountain lion kill?
Pick a story dude.
MOO
Exactly.If it is foul play, I’m praying she confided in someone.
MOO
BBM
I agree.
He can *have it all* if he can paint himself as a victim.
( Which he very well may be ...IDK )
All that stuff he served up in the impromptu interview is nonsensical.
BM ,so you’re offering a 210K reward for her return from a mountain lion kill?
Pick a story dude.
MOO
Hear, hear!Thank you for this understanding. We only get one bite at the apple. Why jump the gun if we don't have to? There's a reason on a felony (in California) we have a three year statute of limitations to charge (not counting murder of course). I might know on day three of an investigation what the deal is, but why not take the extra time to gather my evidence? The second you charge someone, they can invoke their speedy trial rights. Why would I cut myself down to a mere 60 days on a homicide when I can have a lot more?
There is no doubt TONS of evidence in this case to go through. I'm not sure why people think they need to either arrest him NOW or announce he's been cleared and they need help after all. It's likely neither of those things. Just because we don't know what they're doing does not mean they don't know what they're doing.
Consider the intricacies of defendant rights once they've been charged. You (as a DA) do yourself no favors but jumping the gun, just to appease the public.