Oh goodness, me too. Poor Barbara.Was just thinking how much I hope this one doesn’t go the way of the BT case.

eta I meant that (progress) about Suzanne, but that goes for Barbara too.
Oh goodness, me too. Poor Barbara.Was just thinking how much I hope this one doesn’t go the way of the BT case.
People who donated to the fund might want to know.I believe this is intentional if you consider that it's very unusual to be searching independently while LE is investigating and also officially searching.
If you listened to the nephew's audio interview the reporter asks where they are searching and he does give a generic reply but also says he doesn't want to give out details live on air. He must not be giving details off the air either because we're not seeing it reported in MSM.
MOO
Did the husband offer an award and then say no questions asked? I feel that changes things a bitWas just thinking how much I hope this one doesn’t go the way of the BT case.
Highly unlikely.Could it be the Sheriff knows nothing more than we do. They found one of her items, 2000 feet from her house, ok, whippee fizz. Where is she?!
I think this makes sense. When someone replied upthread that they were cancer treatments, I thought the same.
My son's girlfriend (early 20s) has been locked down with us since March 20th and not seen her parents as one of them has recently finished chemo.
No....I don’t get that sense at all. I think they actually have a pretty good idea of the why, the who, possibly the where. Now they’re gathering evidence.
I think that's an error. The photo was posted on May 9, 2019, not May 9, 2020.The compromised immune system and lockdown theory do make sense BUT.... Suzanne did post a picture with her 2 daughters the day before she went missing. I believe they said it was on facebook.
I'll have to remember thisIt’s generally the quietest when a lot is going on. Hoping for an update.
Ok thank you. I did read somewhere there was a mistake but wasn't sure which picture it was. So there were no pictures at all from this mother's day? Or are we thinking she is not really that active on social media?I think that's an error. The photo was posted on May 9, 2019, not May 9, 2020.
ONE OF US!Thanks, Fireflize!! Gannon was my first WS case and I didn’t intend for there to be another one but here I am. It’s such a great forum - it’s hard to stay away.
Your posts in that forum were super helpful. Good to see you here!Thanks, Fireflize!! Gannon was my first WS case and I didn’t intend for there to be another one but here I am. It’s such a great forum - it’s hard to stay away.
Could it possibly be that an inmate, say a sex offender, had been released recently due to COVID-19?
Edited to Snip Quote
Yes @Silverheels you know you are a Web sleuther when another case draws you inONE OF US!
You're one of us now
This ^^^I wonder if the evidence that LE has gives them certainty she’ll be found close to her home. If not, she could be anywhere, including between Maysville and Denver.
Re:dept of corrections ? If someone on parole is involved ? iMO otherwise I don’t see why as their responsibilities are for those incarcerated or on paroleWe always need to be careful to not cast aspersions at innocent people. For those members who are suspicious that someone was out of town the day Suzanne disappeared, please also consider that it may have happened because someone knew that person would be out of town and Suzanne would be alone.
On another note, anyone have any ideas on why Department of Corrections would be involved in the search?
No, no Mother's day photo from this year that the public can see. There could be private posts that aren't visible to the public, but the photo that everyone seems to be referencing with her daughters is publicly available on FB and was posted May 2019.Ok thank you. I did read somewhere there was a mistake but wasn't sure which picture it was. So there were no pictures at all from this mother's day? Or are we thinking she is not really that active on social media?