- Joined
- Mar 21, 2009
- Messages
- 4,051
- Reaction score
- 13,195
My father was an investigator. That's the kind of stuff he did. Take stuff and go thru it later.
I just wanted to clarify that it was actually taken.
Obviously someone wanted to go through it.
My father was an investigator. That's the kind of stuff he did. Take stuff and go thru it later.
Someone asked about it in blog comments, and TI acknowledged their point, but said that the dog was 18 years old and was not killed. IIRC.Did anyone ever address why the dog that actually would have barked.....died right before the stalking?
I just wanted to clarify that it was actually taken.
Obviously someone wanted to go through it.
lol....huh?
Taken or gone thru doesn't change the fact that someone is looking very, very closely at TI. There are only 3 groups of people I can think of off the top of my head who would benefit from that; LE, the media, or the people who might be getting ready to sue her. None bode well for her.
She may have some lawsuits of her own in mind.
I was just reading over at the blog and ran across a mention of M's jewelry.I'm almost positive she gave descriptions.
I mean who has all of their jewelry photographed ?
I've never heard of having to have a picture of something that was stolen.
I was just reading over at the blog and ran across a mention of M's jewelry.
Yes she emailed descriptions of the jewelry over to the detective after she realized they were missing.
Morgan had always kept her nicer jewelry in a specific place as most women do. Her costume jewelry was still around in her bedroom.
When Toni heard about someone's arrest in another town through a friend, she found out that he had turned in some gold jewelry in for cash at a cash for gold exchange store. Toni was curious if any of the pieces matched any of Morgan's jewelry. LE didn't cooperate with her saying Toni would need to supply pictures of the jewelry. I mean, really?
It's hard for me to believe LE would be that lame on this issue. How hard would it be to take her list and check to see if any of the pieces described seemed to match those that had been turned in for cash. :waitasec: If none of the pieces seemed close, then those weren't Morgan's pieces.
A little lession here is to take pics of your better items, decorative and personal, in your house. Put them with your insurance papers or in a safe. That way if they're ever lost or stolen you have direct evidence of what they look like. Even if they're not mucho expensive, they mean something to you.
No...can you link (or say which blog post) plz?I think I caught up reading all the posts. Did anybody see that TI posted in the comments of a few days ago that Morgan had not been wearing the green 'skinny' jeans and t-shirt earlier when she arrived home? Just thought I'd mention it as we posted on that a lot.
I think I caught up reading all the posts. Did anybody see that TI posted in the comments of a few days ago that Morgan had not been wearing the green 'skinny' jeans and t-shirt earlier when she arrived home? Just thought I'd mention it as we posted on that a lot.
No...can you link (or say which blog post) plz?
I think I caught up reading all the posts. Did anybody see that TI posted in the comments of a few days ago that Morgan had not been wearing the green 'skinny' jeans and t-shirt earlier when she arrived home? Just thought I'd mention it as we posted on that a lot.
The person who has been named was charged with other crimes. He could be terrified of having a murder pinned on him so is keeping quiet about defamation right now. I wonder if he blames The family for increased police attention and his getting caught.
Does anyone else not finding it to be speaking volumes that here we are literally months into this blog where there have been absolute names stated associated with extremely serious felony crimes..and imo more importantly continue to be called out by name and absolutely no legal action being taken for what would be a slam dunk case of defamation if the accusations were untrue, not factual, and lies.. And imo the issue of utmost importance and time being of the essence to put a halt on the naming and accusations immediately..
Yet nothing..it continues...??
I think mom did clarify tonight in her blog Morgan did have alot of freedom before the stalking. The change of lifestyle had to take its toll.
Nooooo! I missed that! And I was trying to read carefully but admittedly was skipped thru the kind and thoughtful posts looking for more clues. I know, I know.
Did she say what M HAD been wearing when she went out? Did she clarify if the jeans were slouchy, comfy ones or dressier? So many questions!!!!
Quiet as far as WE know, right? In reality, they could be posting on the blog, but might be getting blocked for whatever reason. And they really can't come over here and post (assuming they've heard of WS) can they? I mean, they CAN, but but they can't introduce any new facts without getting verified, which could be very intimidating.
And if they really know anything about a stalker, a murder or M's (possible, but not not proven) drug use they might be afraid to come forward for fear of being "outed." I wouldn't want to live in fear of the wrath of the (alleged) perp(s) or conversely, take any backlash for saying something about M that might be upsetting to hear if such info exists. After all, mom posted on her blog that she knows how to look into IP addresses now, and even suggested we sleuth each other over here at one point.
Another possible reality is that they aren't being quiet, but are communicating in ways/places we don't know about or can't discuss here.
JMO!!!