It's official. Hell really has frozen over. Insurance companies giving back $$? I will believe it when I see it!
Boston is letting residents get tested at their discretion, when there is an extreme shortage of tests. We are in a stay at home order. If think you have COVID, you should call your doctor and follow his/her instructions. Otherwise, we are trying to let the virus extinguish by not intermixing, so personal decisions on testing seem wasteful.
In a shortage of tests, I would think that tests would be used to identify those with symptoms, used on front liners, or in population studies for research. But shouldn't they be stockpiled otherwise, for when they can be better used, as in after the-stay-at home order is lifted?
Looks reasonable to me. Am I missing something?See my post here about Colorado, I’m in shock:
Coronavirus COVID-19 - Global Health Pandemic #49
Trying to read/learn more about this and listen to the full briefing by the Governor before commenting.
Will they get the address right though? hehe.I think if you've not been fortunate to be in the refund category then you are better off waiting for a paper check that will be mailed to your last address on your tax return. If you attempt to add direct deposit bank info now, the chances of IRS getting it right are not favorable. Just sayin....![]()
It sounds like he is going to thin the herd! He knows we haven't even peaked yet, but we have open hospital beds, so....
Be safe out there y'all!
"Kemp said with the reopenings he expected cases of the virus to increase, but believed that the state would be able to stay on top of it with increased hospital capacity. State officials would also be on the lookout for any possible hot spots for the virus."
"These are tough decisions, no doubt. And I will have to make more of them," Kemp said, adding that he didn't "give a damn about politics right now" when asked what the political impact of his decisions might be."
Kemp: Restaurants, other businesses to reopen in Georgia amid COVID-19 fight
BBMI believe one basic, but profound, difference between your two examples would be the fact that the teachers life doesn’t quite literally depend upon buying clothing, shoes, backpacks, food, supplies, etc out of their own pocket. If the teacher was unable, for whatever reason (lack of funds after paying their own obligations, inability to procure the desired items, etc) to buy these things, nobody is going to die. If the doctor or nurse or any other frontline medical worker is unable to buy their own PPE, they quite literally may die. Or worse, they may go home and kill their husband, wife, children, or parents.
WA Cases on 4/20/2020:
Age 0-19 ........394
Age 20-39 ......3,366
Age 40-59......4,141
Age 60-79......2,938
Age 80+.......1,204
DEATHS:
Age 0-19 .........-0-
Age 20-39 ........3
Age 40-59 .......55
Age 60-79 .......243
Age 80+...........351
DEATH BY SEX:
Female 43%
Male 56%
When two New York City hospitals recently began screening every pregnant woman who was admitted to give birth for COVID-19, doctors made a startling discovery: About one in eight women tested positive, but the vast majority of them showed no symptoms.
“It’s only two weeks of data and we’ll certainly continue to collect and further publish on that data, but it really did show that 13.5% of women showing up feeling well to have a baby were coronavirus positive,” Dr. Dena Goffman, study co-author and chief of obstetrics at New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Columbia University Medical Center, told MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow.
But 88% who had the disease at admission had no symptoms of it when tested, offering a possible glimpse into the prevalence of asymptomatic COVID-19 cases in New York City. Researchers continue to investigate whether people who aren't coughing or sneezing can infect others.
The findings, published Monday in The New England Journal of Medicine, are based on 215 women who delivered babies at the New York–Presbyterian Allen Hospital and Columbia University Irving Medical Center between March 22 and April 4, 2020.
Most pregnant women with coronavirus had no symptoms, study finds
Well I found it. Not once has this information been mentioned in the Massachusetts media or has the mass.gov page linked to. I have never seen information from other states, or national data either.
Literally the most important U.S. based information to disseminate.
https://www.mass.gov/doc/covid-19-dashboard-april-20-2020/download
Age of death, health status, hospitalizations by age. Massachusetts data through yesterday.
View attachment 243816
The graphs show-
The median age of death is well over 80 (the average age of death in the U.S. is 79).
97.5% of COVID-19 victims had underlying health issues.
73% of hospitalizations were of those over 70.
Also-
Those under 30 have less risk of COVID-19 than they do for the flu.
People from 40-60 have little risk of death, unless they have health issues.
There is much clearer picture of who is vulnerable from COVID-19 than there is the flu. The flu has a lot less age discrimination.
2017-2018 Estimated Influenza Illnesses, Medical visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths and Estimated Influenza Illnesses, Medical visits, Hospitalizations, and Deaths Averted by Vaccination in the United States | CDC
This COVID data has been compiled from the onset, but not shared from the Mass DPH website. I'm a bit of a simpleton, but if I was in charge about 2.5 months ago and I saw this data coming in, I wouldn't have locked down the country.
I'd have spent trillions of dollars locking down the vulnerable citizens, instead of lighting trillions of dollars on fire. Mandatory stay at home for seniors, with food distribution available. Extreme caution and procedures at senior living centers. Relocating vulnerable people from dangerous home situations if they want (multigenerational families). Full unemployment benefits for vulnerable that shouldn't working. And whatever else is required.
Why did we lock down everyone?
On Monday, a technical oddity exacerbated the price plunge as traders fled the May futures contract ahead of its expiration tomorrow. The following month’s contract fell 12% to $22.05 a barrel, making the spread between the two months blow out more than $20.
“There is little to prevent the physical market from the further acute downside path over the near term,” said Michael Tran, managing director of global energy strategy at RBC Capital Markets. “Refiners are rejecting barrels at a historic pace and with U.S. storage levels sprinting to the brim, market forces will inflict further pain until either we hit rock bottom, or COVID clears, whichever comes first, but it looks like the former.”
Oil plunges below $0 for the first time in history amid Covid-19 crisis
Since this is a novel virus that no one, as far as we know, has immunity to there's a chance that everyone will get the virus. JMO.I was unable to add before edit expired but wanted to say that of the COVID-19 cases cited above in the populations that are not dying today, we have no idea or data on how being subjected to the virus will affect the individual's future health. Will the 30- somethings have longterm respiratory problems and the 40-year-olds lose their eyesight?
It's a gamble, every person is a potential carrier, and your best bet is not to contract the virus, period!
Okay, I'm hopeful. All other governors will be closely watching Ohio. These citizens aren't babies. They deal with some extreme weather. I hope they take the precautions we've all learned.
hopeful they show us what to do. <modsnip: removed comment about journalist integrity>
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.