Coronavirus COVID-19 - Global Health Pandemic #71

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #881
So you don't need the state to mandate the wearing of a mask first? You can just decide on behalf of your own organisation that you wish to do that?
Yes, and many have. Kroger, Walmart, Best Buy, PetSmart, Cosco, Kohl's, McDonald's and scores more. Nationwide. Irrespective of state mandates.
 
  • #882
Interesting. What else could possibly fall apart in our country?
Bankruptcies
Lawsuits
Riots
Massive unemployment
Massive virus deaths
Massive virus infections and illness
Hate crimes and racism

All could have been prevented or minimized if we just wore masks. The world and Covid are laughing at us.
 
  • #883
I also just wanted to point out that even the CDC new guidelines on reopening schools recommends listening to the science and public health officials if the transmission is not well controlled in an area. They also recommend pods, cohorts and other safety measures.

"If there is substantial, uncontrolled transmission, schools should work closely with local health officials to make decisions on whether to maintain school operations," they read. "The health, safety, and wellbeing of students, teachers, staff and their families is the most important consideration in determining whether school closure is a necessary step," the guidance adds.

"Communities can support schools staying open by implementing strategies that decrease a community's level of transmission. However, if community transmission levels cannot be decreased, school closure is an important consideration. Plans for virtual learning should be in place in the event of a school closure."

Source: CNN: CDC New Coronavirus Guidelines for Schools

JMO, and I've only skimmed the new guidelines via articles is that they don't really address the child to adult risk of transmission. Especially in the 10+ age bracket. And that's a very important consideration. They also just say "best available evidence" from other schools who have re-opened overseas but don't acknowledge that the vast majority of those successful countries only did so after the outbreak was sufficiently under control in their communities, after significant safety measures were taken first. It's like ignoring the big elephant in the room.

I think everyone can agree that we want kids to be able to go back to 'in-person' school and to develop their learning and social skills, also availing themselves of the support structures which are in place in public schools. But, in my opinion, safety has to still come first.

Here is a direct link to the guidelines:

Communities, Schools, Workplaces, & Events
 
  • #884
Bankruptcies
Lawsuits
Riots
Massive unemployment
Massive virus deaths
Massive virus infections and illness
Hate crimes and racism

All could have been prevented or minimized if we just wore masks. The world and Covid are laughing at us.
No we are not laughing at you. We want you to beat this. We have seen NY numbers climb and then fall along with us. In the UK we got the numbers down without a mask mandate at all. It has only come in since we ended 4 month lockdown and opened up. I am sure the other states will get there numbers down too. Arizona is slowing and so will the others. Hang in there.
 
  • #885
It is an extremely militarised border - hard to see how someone got across it. But then it is hard to see how anyone with the virus would get into North Korea .... from anywhere.

Families have been divided by the North/South Korea border and never see each other, except for one meeting that was allowed a couple of years ago. But it was said to be the first and last meeting.

Tears and joy as Korean families reunite

bribe the guards
 
  • #886
  • #887
  • #888
  • #889
Is it discrimination to not allow shirtless people in but allow people wearing shirts in?
Well yes it is but as it is not based on race sex or age it is legal I guess. The thing is in England the shops are not discriminating at all and are just assuming those without masks have a good reason and are letting them shop, as reported in the link I posted upthread. I hope that approach avoids any confrontations.
 
  • #890
It doesn't work like that over here. Discrimination laws apply to a person's national origin, race, color, religion, disability, sex, and familial status. A business may apply whatever dress code they desire. Some restaurants will not admit men without a tie, or people with uncovered underarms, for instance. Most in my beach town do not allow dining in swim attire, and so on. As long as the rules are applied equally, i.e. all must wear a mask, all must wear shoes, all must wear a shirt, it's perfectly legal for a business to dictate such and throw you out.
It's pretty much the same as you describe in the UK too. Dress codes are also common.
 
  • #891
Well yes it is but as it is not based on race sex or age it is legal I guess. The thing is in England the shops are not discriminating at all and are just assuming those without masks have a good reason and are letting them shop, as reported in the link I posted upthread. I hope that approach avoids any confrontations.
And that may well be why the UK is right up there on the case numbers and deaths.
 
  • #892
They defied health rules for a storybook wedding. The virus didn’t spare them. — San Francisco Chronicle

“The doors were locked.

Rows of pews were taped off.

The guests were arriving, as instructed, from an underground parking garage through a back door that led to the church interior.

Then a city official crashed the wedding, which took place in early July in SS Peter and Paul’s Church, with its picturesque edifice overlooking Washington Square Park in North Beach.

The pastor did not seem surprised by the official’s order to stop the proceedings, according to a city report, and the wedding party moved outdoors to a basketball court where the ceremony — minus the nearly 100 guests who had assembled — continued on Zoom.

San Francisco’s city attorney had warned Catholic leaders to stop holding illegal indoor events only days earlier. Yet the leadership of SS Peter and Paul’s helped organize the wedding ceremony, the city said. The celebration included a rehearsal dinner and reception with invitations extended to large groups from multiple households, at a time when such gatherings remain heavily restricted in much of the Bay Area.

In the days following, the newlywed couple and at least eight attendees tested positive for the coronavirus, two guests told The Chronicle.”
 
  • #893
What does that mean? It is a condition of entry, like wearing a mask.

It means, is that a health law? The places I see signs about no shirt, no shoes, no service is mainly when groceries or food is available.

Nevermind. It isnt.
 
  • #894
What about fancy restaurants that require a jacket or tie. They still do that? #imnotfancy

It means, is that a health law? The places I see signs about no shirt, no shoes, no service is mainly when groceries or food is available.
 
  • #895
Aww I feel really strongly for all the Teachers who are not yet comfortable to re enter the classroom setting. With parents and Organisations practically demanding they re-open. I know from my own children and from myself having once been a child that there does not necessarily need to be 'sickness' around for a child to randomly vomit their guts up.. they are just so unpredictable. There is also the high risk of them being infected and spreading virus without displaying the symptoms.. it's a dangerous and scary situation for any Teacher to be pressured into at this point. The spread needs to be slowed down to an almost complete stop before it can be deemed 'safe' for anybody who works from 1 room that seats numerous people for hours at a time. The Teachers have families too and there lives are being put on the line IMO. And then there are the Hospital Workers who have witnessed more death and heartache in 6 months than any of us will see in our lifetimes. The longer the spread continues, the longer the Medics suffer mentally and emotionally. It has cost billions in money and the cost of human life, is even far greater. And it is not over yet! We cannot change what has happened but we CAN change the direction we are all still headed in. Us people are driving the virus right now and people are dying. I wish people around the World would just get on board. We cannot have our freedom whilst being held hostage by Coronavirus... The saddest part of all... Us Lot In Here Are Not The Ones Who Need To Be Reading This! X
 
  • #896
What about fancy restaurants that require a jacket or tie. They still do that? #imnotfancy

#imnoteither

We earlier discussed I'm from a redneck state lol.
 
  • #897
And that may well be why the UK is right up there on the case numbers and deaths.
No because it has not been in shops where the major transmissions have been but care homes and workplaces. Also during the 4 month lockdown only essential shops have been open.
 
  • #898
It means, is that a health law? The places I see signs about no shirt, no shoes, no service is mainly when groceries or food is available.

Things change when it becomes a public health emergency. Our Health Ministers can require different things of us, and the shops would likely be in violation if they didn't follow the requirements and do their best to enforce them.

Fortunately, in this country, the police are following up. The 'Bunnings Karen' later filmed herself telling the police that they would be committing armed kidnap if they took her away from the store.

Australia: Legal Responses to Health Emergencies
 
  • #899
  • #900
US records more than 1,000 COVID deaths a day as Republicans mull relief

US records more than 1,000 COVID deaths a day as Republicans mull relief

Martin Pengelly in New York

8 hrs ago
...
The US has recorded more than 1,000 deaths a day from COVID-19 for five days running, as cases surge in southern and western states, the national caseload nears 4.2m and the death toll approaches 150,000.

Related: Texas hospital forced to set up 'death panel' as COVID-19 cases surge

In Washington, Senate Republicans and the White House continue talks over what to put in the next stimulus package, with Democrats fretting on the sidelines over the imminent expiration of enhanced unemployment payments and rising evictions of Americans unable to make their rent.

On Sunday, key negotiators said the package would be unveiled on Monday.

On ABC’s This Week, the White House chief of staff, Mark Meadows, said: “The original benefits will not [be extended]. We are going to be prepared, on Monday, to provide unemployment insurance extension that would be 70% of wages.”
 

Attachments

  • upload_2020-7-27_9-29-30.png
    upload_2020-7-27_9-29-30.png
    68 bytes · Views: 5
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
70
Guests online
3,188
Total visitors
3,258

Forum statistics

Threads
632,659
Messages
18,629,793
Members
243,238
Latest member
talu
Back
Top